Not exact matches
The
labor force participation rate has fallen due to cyclical factors such as workers temporarily dropping out of the workforce because of discouragement over job prospects, but also due to structural
forces such as the Baby Boomers reaching retirement
age and younger workers staying in school longer.
The
labor force participation rate, or the share of working -
age Americans who are employed or at least looking for a job, was steady at 62.8 percent.
They broke the adult US population up into 13 different
age groups, and then projected what the overall
labor force participation rate would have been if each of those
age groups had the same
participation rates that they did in December 2007, right before the start of the recession.
The
labor force participation rate is the percentage of Americans over the
age of 16 that are either working or looking for work.
The conventional wisdom in the economics community is that the
labor force participation rate would have continued to decline even if the great recession never occurred, because as the nation
ages the share of retired workers would grow.
The
labor force participation rate is another important place to look in this regard, but it is a) a very noisy monthly indicator, and b) the overall
rate is down in part due to retirement of
aging boomers.
The
Labor Force Participation Rate (LFPR) is a simple computation: You take the Civilian
Labor Force (people
age 16 and over employed or seeking employment) and divide it by the Civilian Noninstitutional Population (those 16 and over not in the military and or committed to an institution).
Secondly, unlike the traditional role specialization of domestic and agricultural work between the two sexes in rural China as the popular saying «nan geng nv zhi» (men till the land and women weave cloth), it is quite common that both men and women work outside home in urban China, and the
labor force participation rates for fathers and mothers with children
aged 0 — 6 in 2004 were 90.6 and 71.3 % respectively (Du and Dong 2008).