Asked about the government's proposals for the future of public sector pensions, the most popular option was the government's original plan to gradually increase the retirement
age of public sector workers under 50 to 65, supported by 39 % of respondents.
Not exact matches
«The shadow chancellor has wrapped up
public sector cuts,
public sector pay freezes, a rise in retirement
age and reduced pension rights in warm words that will ring hollow with Britain's army
of public sector workers.»
Mr Cameron accused the chancellor
of a «craven surrender» in allowing these
workers to retire at 60 - Lord Turner is expected to call for a general rise in retirement
age to 67 - and argued that any pensions scheme must be equitable for private and
public sector workers.
In the
age of austerity, where we'll be asking frontline
public sector workers to help us keep pay levels down we can not leave the pay
of public sector bureaucrats untouched.
A report by Policy Exchange published last week claimed that
public sector workers are better off than their private
sector counterparts in terms
of hours worked, retirement
age and pension quality.
The unions are also highlighting the serious workplace and social problems that will accompany the enforced longer working
age for
public sector workers, particularly those with strenuous or demanding jobs like construction
workers, cleaners, nurses, paramedics and teachers, including an increasingly frail workforce and the exclusion
of younger
workers from the labour market.
«It is low - paid private
sector workers working beyond retirement
age... who are subsidising
public sector pensions while receiving none
of the benefits.
Police and firefighters are typically eligible to retire after 20 years
of service, and many other
public sector workers can leave at
age 55.