Not exact matches
Periods of volcanism can cool the climate (as with the 1991 Pinatubo eruption), methane emissions from increased biological activity can warm the climate, and slight
changes in solar output and
orbital variations can all have climate effects which are much shorter in duration than the ice
age cycles, ranging from less than a decade to a thousand years in duration (the Younger Dryas).
While natural global warming during the ice
ages was initiated by increased solar radiation caused by cyclic
changes to Earth's
orbital parameters, there is no evident mechanism for correcting Anthropogenic Global Warming over the next several centuries.
The response of that model to volcanic forcings, the last ice
age,
changes in
orbital parameters etc. are all «out - of - sample» tests that are not fixed by adjusting parameters.
The ice
age orbital correlation is old knowledge; there all those years ago in my high school geology text *, along with the observation that the insolation
change is way too small to provide a simplistic explanation.
1966 Emiliani's analysis of deep - sea cores shows the timing of ice
ages was set by small
orbital shifts, suggesting that the climate system is sensitive to small
changes.
Based on the comparison between reconstructions and simulations, there is high confidence that not only external
orbital, solar and volcanic forcing, but also internal variability, contributed substantially to the spatial pattern and timing of surface temperature
changes between the Medieval Climate Anomaly and the Little Ice
Age (1450 to 1850).
The important point here is that a small external forcing (
orbital for ice -
ages, or GHG plus aerosols & land use
changes in the modern context) can be strongly amplified by the positive feedback mechanism (the strongest and quickest is atmospheric water vapor - a strong GHG, and has already been observed to increase.
Cochelin et al used a model of intermediate complexity to show that the
orbital variations over the next 100,000 years are weak enough that even a little human CO2 remaining in the atmosphere is enough to keep the earth out of an ice
age («Simulation of long - term future climate
changes with the green McGill paleoclimate model: The next glacial inception»).
Climate model simulations confirm that an Ice
Age can indeed be started in this way, while simple conceptual models have been used to successfully «hindcast» the onset of past glaciations based on the
orbital changes.
Changes in insolation due to the sun's
orbital cycles, or Milankovitch cycles, correspond with the recent 100,000 - year cycles of past major ice
ages.
The paper also notes that
orbital changes are one initial cause for ice
ages.
The
orbital changes that caused the ice
ages are far too weak and slow to cause a warming as rapid as the current one.
Another fascinating question relates to the triggers for ice
ages, which are generally thought to involve reduced summer insolation at 65 N as consequence of
orbital forcing
changes.
As the Earth came out of the ice
age the primary forcing which caused the initial warming was due to
changes in the Earth's
orbital pattern.
In the case of the 100 kyr ice
age cycles, that forcing is high northern latitude summer insolation driven by predictable
changes in Earth's
orbital and rotational parameters — aka, Milankovitch theory — which has the intial effect of melting glaciers, thereby reducing albedo at those latitudes.
When
orbital wiggles and rising greenhouse gases warmed the earth from the last ice
age, proxy records show that smooth
changes were interspersed with abrupt coolings and warmings, wettings and dryings.
Have a look at this updated version of one of the articles here about past temperatures, it has good graphics and more detail about determining the past, plus links to good sources: http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/10/26/20495/240 The warming that ended the ice
age was caused by
changes in the earth's
orbital inclination (Milankovich cycles).
wili, I've often pondered about the ice
age cycles, how a bit - o - carbon equivalent in
orbital changes can cause a 100ppm increase in atmospheric carbon.
As the gas level rose, temperature would rise with a time lag — although only a few decades, not centuries, for the rates of
change were now enormously faster than the
orbital shifts that brought ice
ages.
1966 Emiliani's analysis of deep - sea cores and Broecker's analysis of ancient corals show that the timing of ice
ages was set by small
orbital shifts, suggesting that the climate system is sensitive to small
changes.
Posted in Musings, Science Lessons, tagged astronomy, climate
change, education, fantasy, game of thrones, george r r martin, glaciers, global warming, hbo, ice
age,
orbital mechanics, science, song of ice and fire on June 2, 2014 8 Comments»
The most clear evidence of
change is from retreating ice escarpments in the southern hemisphere and it is thought this is mostly the result of Mars» own
orbital cycles similar to those that controled the timing of Earth's ice
ages.
As for the cause of the ice
ages, it is generally but cautiously accepted that they were triggered by cyclical
changes in the earth's
orbital inclinations.
But if climate really is as insensitive as he claims it to be, the climate forcing producing the ice
ages must have been huge, much larger than the radiative forcing from
orbital changes, surface albedo, and greenhouse gases.
We can vote on whether or not we want to make weather to produce an ice
age, given
orbital and tectonic
changes.
Besides demonstrating his firm grasp of the power of these various factors to
change temperatures, this remarkable matching of theory to real - world data also tells us just how ornery the climate beast may be: the
orbital changes that paced the ice
ages were incredibly small.