* The most important thing that
agents and publishers think about when they're considering your work
I know how authors think, I understand how
agents and publishers think.
Sort of give you an idea of what
agents and publishers think of us, doesn't?)
The truth has always been that most trad published books are damp squibs (speaking from experience), but self - publishing has allowed authors to give readers what they want to read instead of what
agents and publishers think they want to read.
Not exact matches
Ernest Hemingway never codified his insights on writing into a book, but he did share his
thinking on the topic in commissioned articles; letters to his
agents,
publishers,
and friends;
and through his novels.
While I am on the subject of the publishing industry, let me make one little tiny suggestion to
publishers and book
agents: Please, out of respect
and courtesy to the authors who submit books to you, don't you
think it would be wise to create a little form letter that you send to authors whose books you reject?
Agents and publishers liked the writers» manuscripts, but for whatever reason didn't
think they could sell them.
Agents will have to became Writers Scouts, do their own research rather that being the writers search for the right Agent,
and Publishers should start
thinking as professional football teams, making their authors the best, supporting
and coaching them to become even better,
and marketing their authors like mad.
He said HBG is willing to continue to talk to the Guild about different proposals
and that if HBG «comes up with something that makes sense for both sides» he would talk to
agents on a case - by - case basis about the
publisher's
thinking.
While Weinstein doesn't see corporate publishing going away, ever, he does
think the business is at «an enormous transition point»
and that the outsourcing major
publishers have been doing for years — forcing
agents to do more editing, going with outside PR, telling authors they need to take hold of their own marketing — will mean that more agencies,
and others, will jump into the publishing fray.
A lot of aspiring authors gravitate toward new
agents because they
think the odds of being accepted by a long - time
and / or famous
agent are more difficult than sending an unsolicited MS directly to a
publisher.
I
think the
agent and the
publisher of the future will have to offer marketing
and distribution above
and beyond what the author can do for himself, or herself.
Anyone interested in what
agents think about social media should read Social Media for Authors — As It Relates to Literary Agents and Publi
agents think about social media should read Social Media for Authors — As It Relates to Literary
Agents and Publi
Agents and Publishers.
I have been writing for 20 years
and I always
thought that no matter how hard I worked or how good I was, any success was mostly in the hands of
publishers and agents.
January 2010 I started blogging
and by the end of 2012, so we are talking a good couple of years of blogging here, I built a speaking platform for myself, I had started podcasting, I was blogging a couple times a week, good community of people
and then boom, the book offer comes in from a
publisher in the U.S.
and I didn't go with that initial offer but it made me
think very seriously about going back to that goal of someday writing a book
and so I was introduced to a literary
agent and I obviously went the traditional publishing route with Virtual Freedom but there's nothing wrong with the self publishing route at all.
And if your agent does not want to be involved with initiatives that won't make a lot of money up front, then you should do it yourself and not be limited by what large NY publishers think will sell we
And if your
agent does not want to be involved with initiatives that won't make a lot of money up front, then you should do it yourself
and not be limited by what large NY publishers think will sell we
and not be limited by what large NY
publishers think will sell well.
Think of like this: the
agent or
publisher is doing you a favor by telling you exactly what they want
and how they want it.
I
think this week might secretly be listed on
agents»
and publishers» calendars as National Rejection Week.
So there's been a lot of dinosaur
thinking and fear of technology
and wanting to do it the old way for
publishers and agents and editors
and everybody in the business because they're not math
and science majors — none of them, for the most part — they're English majors.
Sometimes I mention it in a pitch because I
think it will help
agents and publishers see more potential to attract media
and publicity.
We all
think our work is fantastic, but
agents and publishers have huge amounts of this «fantastic» work landing on their desks daily in varying degrees of fantastic - ness.
That is why I
think websites like Wattpad are so important for struggling writers to find their voices amongst the deafening noise of major
publishers and literary
agents who are so focussed on risk aversion
and unwilling to give talented independent authors a chance.
Today, self - publishing has lost its stigma, with
agents and big
publishers thinking of it as a market test.
After writing dozens of query letters, getting rejections from
agents,
and only being offered a deal with a
publisher if I put a few thousand dollars upfront, I was frustrated
and thought I'd never get these books into print.
And here's a swift kick in the pants to those publishers and agents who seem to think we can put the genie back in the bottle and go back to publishing like it was fifty years a
And here's a swift kick in the pants to those
publishers and agents who seem to think we can put the genie back in the bottle and go back to publishing like it was fifty years a
and agents who seem to
think we can put the genie back in the bottle
and go back to publishing like it was fifty years a
and go back to publishing like it was fifty years ago.
I definitely see myself as an entrepreneur now that I've gone indie, where as when I was still querying
agents and publishers, I
thought of myself as applying for a job.
Huge number of myths around indie publishing
and going to a traditional
publisher, so many that most writers won't
think of indie publishing, will just knee - jerk right into the old
agent / editor /
publisher system without one
thought of going another way.
Partly I
think it depends on the author's personality
and how they're best complemented by the
publisher,
and maybe even who their
agent is.
I've heard the
thoughts of using e-books as a proving ground for potential print - worthiness, but I believe that will lead to
agents providing less quality material to Print
publishers and holding a few promising works for internal e-publication.
Even though I wasn't there to experience it, it feels GOOD to
think that all the
agents and publishers who have smuggly rejected so many are now scrambling to attract authors.
My
publisher is close to defunct, my
agent has not done much for me
and I'm
thinking of self - publishing on Amazon.
When most writers talk about publishing a book, they are usually
thinking about traditional publishing — getting an
agent,
and then having your book sold to a
publisher for an advance.
A long time ago writers used to have to rely on getting discovered by
publishers,
agents, or pitching their book to anyone who they
thought would buy it
and ultimately know someone who might be able to get it published for you.
I always
thought that, if I checked off everything they wanted, I would be a sure thing for
agents and publishers.
Writer's Resource works with authors, public speakers,
thought leaders
and small presses to ghostwrite, rewrite
and edit fiction
and nonfiction; pitch to
agents and publishers; develop business proposals
and art grants;
and branding.
Every time I hear self - publishing wholeheartedly recommended I feel a little dirty, because I
think that the best thing about self - publication is that it thins the crowd of newbie writers taking up
agents»
and publishers» time.
In that case
think about trying to get an actual literary
agent who will help you get a
publisher and all of the points listed above will be done....
But I
think maybe the ebook is something that
publishers have shied away from a little bit
and don't quite know what to do with, so I
think that for
agents, helping the author with that is a good opportunity.
This is the future of publishing, no matter how much
publishers and agents want to make people
think otherwise.
It's fun to
think about getting an
agent and one of the big NY
publishers, but as you said, when reality kicks in
and you realize how huge the pool of writers has become, it's time to find alternative ways to get published.
Thousands of forward -
thinking publishing industry professionals
and participants (journalists, bloggers, authors,
publishers, literary
agents, editors, formatters, cover designers, conference managers, book doctors, publishing consultants, retailers, librarians, educators, readers
and more) who went out of their way to open doors for Smashwords
and our authors
and publishers
Personally I
think traditional
agents and publishers are a dying breed, but take advantage of them before they're gone if you can!
I sort of get the feeling, from various circles, that I * should * be making decisions about things like getting an
agent, querying
publishers versus self - publishing
and all that malarkey round about now... but it seems way too early for me to even be
THINKING about those things while I don't yet have a product I'm anywhere near happy with.
I'm not sure I would agree that SF Is hot right now — I
think it is hot for self - published authors But both my
agent, two other
agents I know,
and publisher told me that SF is tough sell in traditional publishing atm.
As always, the dichotomy between what
publishers say they are doing for authors
and what the authors (through their
agents) actually
think is being done is still there.
I
think a lot of authors (including me) still need to talk to
agents and publishers and find out their options each step of the way, because as Amanda Hocking said, many authors just don't want to do it all themselves all the time, but these authors are the definition of agile start - ups.
A forerunner of the modern
agent / impresario, he secured Spencer a New York
publisher, Appleton
and Co.; pressed for -
and won - royalties on a par with native authors» at a time when most American houses ignored international copyrights; churned out scores of reviews
and notices with publication of each new volume, which he placed in newspapers
and magazines across the country; pressed other reviewers into service; helped Spencer organize
and popularize his most arcane
thoughts;
and cultivated literary clubs, college professors, editors, ministers, politicians, tycoons,
and labor councils.
(Note: While I focus primarily on rejection by literary
agents, I do
think what follows is worthwhile for those who have been rejected by literary magazines
and publishers as well.)
I can hear some people asking so yes, in the good old days
agents and publishers used to serve the function of a developmental editor
and would work with an author to further hone a story that wasn't quite ready for prime time, if they
thought the story had sufficient promise.
Use visual
thinking tools like Prezi to quickly get started planning your book
and presenting your book ideas to literary
agents,
publishers,
and prospective readers.