Sentences with phrase «aggregate contribution limit»

The annual aggregate contribution limit for an ABLE account is $ 14,000.

Additionally, because the rules for the annual - addition amounts apply separately to each plan, the contributions to the retirement plan you adopt for your business can be up to $ 51,000, making your aggregate contribution limit $ 102,000, plus an additional $ 5,500 if you reach age 50 by year - end 2013.

First there is the annual aggregate contribution limit of $ 54,000 (2017).

Yesterday, the Albany Times - Union criticized the Board of Elections» decision to not enforce the state's aggregate contribution limit, saying it would allow a single wealthy donor to «pour millions of dollars into an election like this fall's, when every state office will be up for grabs.»

Soon thereafter, a judgment by a federal district court nullified New York's aggregate contribution limit of $ 150,000 as applied to independent expenditure groups, such as super PACs.

2014 04 30 Legal Memo McCutcheon NY State Aggregate Contribution Limit Statute is Likely Unconstitutional -LRB-... by Nick Reisman

Under the bill, the LLC contributions would be restricted to the same $ 5,000 aggregate contribution limit that current law imposes on corporations.

In an editorial on Monday, the Buffalo News criticized the New York State Board of Election's decision to not enforce the state's $ 150,000 aggregate contribution limit, saying it sends a clear message that the system is «broken.»

The announcement from the state board came following two recent court decisions concerning aggregate contribution limits.

Judge Crotty indicated that although he was obliged to follow the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in McCutcheon v. FEC, which recently invalidated federal aggregate contribution limits, he disagreed with the court's analysis and lamented that regular citizens «are too often drowned out by the few who have great resources.»

In conjunction with the U.S. Supreme Court decision to strike down aggregate contribution limits, the lack of real reform in the New York State budget empowers the 1 percent, wrote Katrina vanden Heuvel in the Washington Post.

The board's announcement came after recent court rulings concerning aggregate contribution limits.

If the Supreme Court now strikes down aggregate contribution limits, it will further privilege wealthy donors in the political process and further undermine working people's confidence that government is serving the public interest.»

The case removes the aggregate contribution limits to federal committees and also calls into question the constitutionality of any state - law aggregate contribution limits.

The Court determined that an individual's First Amendment right to participate in the political process by supporting candidates of his / her choice outweighed the government's anticorruption interest in establishing aggregate contribution limits and so reversed the trial court.

The trial court rejected the Challenger's lawsuit, determining that government's interest in avoiding corruption by establishing aggregate contribution limits outweighed the Challenger's interest in making various contributions.

The Court declared the aggregate contribution limits unconstitutional because these limits forced individuals to limit, or reduce the amount of support for, candidates of their choosing.

The Supreme Court of the United States reversed the trial court and declared the aggregate contribution limits unconstitutional.

Therefore, the court ruled that the aggregate contribution limits infringed the Challenger's First Amendment right to support candidates of his choosing and the government had failed to offer a compelling interest to justify this infringement, and so the Court declared the aggregate contribution limits unconstitutional.

The Court did not find Buckley's discussion of aggregate contribution limits to be controlling.

Not exact matches

Find out what the contribution limits are for 401 (k) retirement savings plans in 2017 - 18, including individual, employer and aggregate limits.

Corporations must adhere to a $ 5,000 aggregate annual contribution limit that applies to candidates are well as committees, unless, of course, we're speaking of housekeeping committees, which have no contribution limits.

Corporations are limited to giving $ 5,000 in aggregate direct contributions to all candidate, party, and political action committees in a calendar year; individuals were restricted only by the maximum amount they could give committees.

An 11 - page policy paper released by the New York Public Interest Research Group on Friday takes issue with the state Board of Elections to suspend the aggregate political contribution limits in the wake of the Supreme Court decision, McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission.

A national conservative group on Wednesday is threatening to file a lawsuit unless New York repeal its aggregate limits on campaign contributions.

Good - government advocates fear this morning Supreme Court ruling could have wide - reaching effects for New York's own aggregate limits on campaign contributions in a given election cycle.

Broadly, NYPIRG notes the impact of the decision to suspend the state's $ 150,000 aggregate limit for contributions in an election cycle will have little impact, considering donors can skirt that through donations from a web of limited liability corporations.

The individual aggregate two - year contribution limit had been $ 48,600 for giving to federal candidates, and $ 74,600 for giving to political party committees.

Find out what the contribution limits are for 401 (k) retirement savings plans in 2017 - 18, including individual, employer and aggregate limits.

(v) who makes aggregate contributions of at least $ 1,000,000 (to multiple Accounts given the Maximum Contribution Limit per Account is currently $ 500,000 per Designated Beneficiary), in which case the Class A Units will be subject to a CDSC of 1.00 % if they are redeemed within 6 months of purchase to satisfy a withdrawal.

Note: Contribution limits are an aggregate of traditional and Roth IRAs.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that limits on aggregate contributions by individuals to candidates and political parties violates the First Amendment.