Sentences with phrase «aggressive portfolio even»

If you've got the discipline and the stomach to stick with a very aggressive portfolio even during market cataclysms — or if your nest egg is so large relative to the amount of money you need to draw from it each year so your chances of running through your savings prematurely are minuscule — then maybe you're a candidate for the Buffett approach.

Not exact matches

Even if your time horizon is long enough to warrant an aggressive portfolio, you have to be comfortable with the short - term ups and downs you'll encounter.

So even if you're saving for a long - term goal, if you're more risk - averse you may want to consider a more balanced portfolio with some fixed income investments, And regardless of your time horizon and risk tolerance, even if you're pursuing the most aggressive asset allocation models you may want to consider including a fixed income component to help reduce the overall volatility of your portfolio.

Each 529 savings plan offers its own range of investment options, which might include age - based strategies; conservative, moderate, and aggressive portfolios; or even a mix of funds from which you can build your own portfolio.

Withdrawing 5 % or 6 % may not be sustainable even with more aggressive portfolios, especially if markets fall during early retirement years.

To my way of thinking, even the most aggressive portfolio should not have more than 65 % in stocks and most people should stick to somewhere between 50 % and 60 %.

Even for conservative investors, there are very good reasons to add some aggressive stocks to your portfolio.

Graham Westmacott, my colleague at PWL Capital, has done some compelling research that suggests the whole notion of moving from an aggressive portfolio to a more conservative one is flawed: in his analysis, even «the best possible glide path strategy offers virtually no improvement» over a simple balanced fund that maintains a constant asset allocation.

With his aggressive investment approach, coupled with an ability to keep calm during (and even take advantage of) rough market times, he's well on his way to not only topping a million dollar portfolio by the time he retires, but also leaving a lasting legacy for his newborn granddaughter.

Even if you are creating a very aggressive portfolio, including some fixed - income investments actually increases returns.

And as you may suspect, even in a room filled with financial planners, achieving a more aggressive portfolio posture was, perhaps, the farthest from anyone's mind.

To compensate for that uncertainty, you might tilt your portfolio more toward bonds, even if your time horizon suggests you can be more aggressive.

Given the right market scenario & valuation, and the level of risk elsewhere in my portfolio, I'm not averse to being more aggressive in my exposure — increasing it perhaps to 7.5 %, or even 10 % eventually — consistent with that logic, I'd consider buying VEIL (rather than VOF) if / when I want to increase my Vietnam exposure above 5 %.

Even if your time horizon is long enough to warrant an aggressive portfolio, you have to be comfortable with the short - term ups and downs you'll encounter.

I don't mind admitting that I was even tempted to make the portfolio more aggressive but I didn't act on it.

While I think bonds have a place in even the most aggressive portfolio, it would be a mistake to extrapolate the recent poor run in stocks far into the future and give up on stocks altogether.

Connecticut, once the most aggressive states in the country on its renewable portfolio standard (RPS)-- how much renewable energy that it requires be used — doesn't even register on regional assessments anymore.