Treatment is typically much less
aggressive than in humans.
Not exact matches
«The letter, which comes
in response to an
aggressive campaign by the animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), claims that for more
than 30 years researchers at the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and
Human Development (NICHD) have been «removing [macaques] from their mothers at birth and subjecting them to distressful and sometimes painful procedures that measure their anxiety and depression.»»
Participants who battled what they perceived as
human - looking characters
in the game were more likely to have
aggressive thoughts and words
than those who had shot down monstrous nonhuman characters.
Thea Sharrock's «Henry V» is the most movie - like
in some respects — the music more
aggressive, the action more muscular; yet she too scales it toward the
human, and I like it better
than the Laurence Olivier and Kenneth Branagh films that helped make this the most familiar of the plays presented here.
Unfortunately many of the pit bulls and pit bull mixes you would come across
in city shelters or similar locations, have been bred, kept and trained as fighting dogs, or were kept as guard dogs by drug dealers to be
aggressive to any
humans other
than their owners.
Treatment of cancer
in pets is less
aggressive than the same treatment performed
in humans.
I have more
than 15 years of experience
in addressing all sorts of behavior issues
in dogs: barking, destructive chewing, over-arousal, anxiety and fear as well as reactive or
aggressive behavior towards other dogs or
humans.
also if breeds that were genetically selected to show
human aggression like dobermans rotties and shepherds were as well documented as the history of the APBT i can guarantee you would find many more dogs
in those three that mere and are much
aggressive than the sometimes dog
aggressive APBT
Things like
aggressive behavior is no more predictable
in dogs
than it is
in humans.
For example, one of the scenarios included
in the IPCC's latest assessment assumes
aggressive emissions reductions designed to limit the global temperature increase to 3.6 °F (2 °C) above pre-industrial levels.3 This path would require rapid emissions reductions (more
than 70 % reduction
in human - related emissions by 2050, and net negative emissions by 2100 — see the Appendix 3: Climate Science, Supplemental Message 5) sufficient to achieve heat - trapping gas concentrations well below those of any of the scenarios considered by the IPCC
in its 2007 assessment.