Sentences with phrase «agnostic thought»

According to atheist / agnostic thought, how did all the «something» get created from «nothing?»

Agnostics think you can not prove god's existence OR disprove it so they do whatever it is that they do.

And agnostic thinks that you can't know for sure whether or not there is a god.

I think once an agnostic thinking takes hold of the human race, we'll evolve faster.

There is no room to dilute this fact with agnostic thinking, or claims for lack of proof as it is written in God's word, and a sign for everyone.

Not exact matches

We still think the Roku 2 is the best streamer for most people at this point, thanks to its sturdy performance, (mostly) platform agnostic interface, and appealing price.

I know Intel is somewhat agnostic on the actual products, but what do you think is going to really take off on the wearables side?

The firm is stage - agnostic and doesn't think any idea is too green to be invested in, particular if they're potentially disruptive in the convergence of media, entertainment, and technology.

There are some agnostic theists, who are not sure about a god, but lean toward accepting one or another of them, but I think that the majority of agnostics live without belief and conduct their daily lives atheistically.

I think we would be more of an agnostic to other god (s).

I don't see why you find it so impossible that there are multiple atheists and agnostics here at the same time, when you seem to think it's perfectly plausible that there are multiple believers here at the same time.

What I was sure you could never know I now know, and now I am in the uncomfortable position of knowing this and having to defend it to all of my atheist and agnostic friends, who think I've probably lost my mind.»

Some athiests are just as bad as the fundimentalists... because they «know» I being and agnostic, however, take issue with anyone who says that people who are not religious do not think... in fact, it has been found that statistically, athiests and agnostics know the bible better than christians.

That being said, I think of myself as a tolerant agnostic.

I think the world will be a better place if we just accepted each other — white and black, christian and non-christian, theist and atheist, gnostiic and agnostic.

You are like many, many people who mistakenly think being agnostic is some middle ground between theism and atheism — It's not.

We have thought more about no god than most agnostics did today.

While I can not buy in to ANY religion (agnostic bordering on atheist) I think Mitt is a smart man (unlike the MOST of his fellow candidates) and is actually campaigning on IDEAS vs. just running for president.

I think an agnostic or atheist would be best for the country since they are more likely to be rational, and reasonable.

Darwin wrote in his later years: «I think that generally (& more and more so as I grow older) but not always, that an agnostic would be the most correct description of my state of mind.»

You said, «Personally I think he's atheist / agnostic, but basically wears his faith on his sleeve, because it's impossible to get elected to political office in the U.S without being Christian»

People believe what they learn when they are young and they don't learn to think on their own so many more of them are becoming agnostic which is what the world teaches.

I would not characterize the atheist / agnostic perspective on the whole as angry about the beliefs of others, I think the word you're looking for is incredulity.

Why is it that when someone says they are Agnostic you automatically think they believe in Satan.

I would think you are more of an agnostic.

«I think that generally (& more and more so as I grow older) but not always, that an agnostic would be the most correct description of my state of mind.»

I think a lot of agnostic / atheist people would be perfectly content to live their lives without making their personal convictions a crusade if the other side didn't make a crusade out of their religious beliefs.

I find it amusing how Christians think you should only be agnostic about the god THEY want you to believe in.

I think most atheists would admit they consider themselves what is more commonly being known as agnostic atheists.

I spent most of my upbringing agnostic believing God couldn't be proven real or false and gave little thought to religion.

A theist agnostic is someone who believes in gods, but thinks that they could not know for sure that their god exists.

«An atheist agnostic is someone who does not believe in gods and also thinks that the existence of gods can not be known.

-- I think that generally... an agnostic would be the most correct description of my state of mind.»

As an atheist, agnostic, non believer, infidel, etc, I do not, nor do I think Dawkins subscribes to a «party line».

An agnostic perhaps has not studied the best thinking throughout history concerning mankind's response to the enigma of existence and our place in the world.

Well, this gets us into the realm of penultimate concerns, and organized bodies of religious thought have some value here, even for atheists and agnostics.

at the end of the day i'd rather have an agnostic or atheist as president than someone who believes in some fairy tale, or thinks that god tells people what to do, or that religion is necessary for morals.

I'm an agnostic and see you as a fellow human being who's thinking.

My parents thought of themselves as agnostics.

Based upon my experience, it is all too often the atheist / agnostic audience that poses emotional, baseless, illogical arguments that show a lack of actual critical thinking.

Honestly, as an agnostic atheist, I think this is one of the best popes there has been, although his predecessor was good as well.

Keen thinks some people will want to remain religious agnostics, locating the sacred in «flesh, things, and event or not at all.»

Then later I studied up on other religions and spiritual ideas — moving through a range of spiritual notions, and for a long time thought of myself as SBNR also, then I realized I was agnostic.

I think some people prefer the label «agnostic» to signal a greater degree of uncertainty to the God claim.

A «gnostic» is one who knows about the existence of god and an «agnostic» is one who thinks that god is unknowable.

As an Agnostic, you might have something to say because you are not stating that there is no God, but I really think you should settle on one instead of just going with the flow.

An agnostic approach regarding deities keeps us honest about what we don't know anything about, but also prevents unfounded junk from # 2 above (religion) from dirtying up our rational thinking on the matter.

You could be an agnostic atheist, meaning you don't think that the existence of gods is knowable, but you don't choose to believe in one without further proof.

I'm agnostic towards the existence of some kind of realm beyond the known world but I feel that if there were a God, that entity would be so much larger than anything mankind has (or even could) think up.

Schaeffer could be considered an agnostic theist or an SNR (Spiritual but Not Religious) I suppose, but I do think that his contradictory slogan is for shock value.