Sentences with phrase «agree about something»

Disagreements are: «having or expressing a different opinion and failing to agree about something.»

Even if you don't agree about something, you can still attempt to understand what motivates each of your actions, and what feelings, beliefs, and perceptions underlie each of your complaints.

If both parties agree about something, the judge can make an order that details the terms of the agreement.

I suggest you go back and read 69.1.3, digest it, and take a few deep breaths, before rushing off to find a whole lot of papers that agree about something, although they are not sure what.

Beforehand, some people wondered how such a diverse group would agree about something as tricky as an energy policy.

«It doesn't matter if 99,000 people all agree about something and one person is right.

2) Well we agree about something!

Not exact matches

Both Beck and Kirby agree that someone should have tried to do something about the problem long before now.

Acknowledge the inappropriateness of the behavior in question: Even if you are dealing with someone who is upset about something that you think is petty, you most likely will agree on some level that the way the customer was treated was inappropriate.

He agreed, however, that it's an open question: «We are actively asking ourselves about whether or not good governance might mean something different to family firms, and that's the next place we hope to take our research.»

I really agree with you about [something you said].

If you have poor credit, though, the problem is that they do know something about you — and what they know makes them nervous about the chances you'll pay as agreed.

The easiest place to talk about the family and the family business (and the communication barriers that may be hindering both) may be at a remote destination far from the family home and business where the shared experiences of travel may give you something to talk about on which the whole family can agree.

I agree with the big bang guy... if we talk about proof... let's first figure where we all came from... we have all heard this «Well we know what happened after the big bang... but have no clue what came before» well first figure that out... and if you can't in the next 20 years then there has to be something beyond Physics...

Is this not something we can agree about?

I agree with you that there is no sense in arguing about something that can not be proven with evidence.

Can't we now all agree that private industry workers are overpaid to pad the bottom line and do something about it?

Not taking up for Reality's little brother H.Sent but calling another's following of something that you might not believe or agree with as «a sheep»... does get you just about as dirty as H.Sent..

I so agree with your blog entry for today, in fact it's something I've thought a lot about over the last few days.

That said, I also think its obvious that there is something pathological about the shrill and feverish mentality of many pundits and commentators on the Right, many of whom I probably agree with on a number of substantive points.

In 1700s England, it was generally agreed that something must be done about children's poverty and ignorance.

I agree with you that our society does seem to recognise «deep down... that family life is good, beautiful and true» and it is certainly my experience that «there is something special and uncompromising about the Catholic vision of the family».

They establish that we do, in fact, agree on something that a lot of people (who make their livings by engaging in controversy) seem determined to insist that we disagree about.

Two centuries later, Jules Lequier in France, knowing something about the Socinians, agreed with them.

What happens if teacher is saying something about the Rapture that you don't agree with?

But just about everyone agrees: A 40 percent waste rate is unacceptable — and it's time to do something about it.

And if you are hoping for something better — a representative of Islam who agrees with Franklin Graham about Muhammad or with Newt Gingrich about the Quran — well, it is the real world we are inhabiting.

wow talk about controversial, something we can all agree on is that it would really be funny is if someone put up a happy Hon - aka sign right next to these others lololololol

I agree about the inner witness of the Holy Spirit, but it is such a subjective thing, and many of us what something that is less nebulous.

There is always something about other peoples religion that offends someone, especially IF it doesn't agree with theirs.

Recently I became vividly aware of this problem when I was in a group of about a dozen churchmen who were trying to agree on something to say together on social problems.

(Though I think I remember something you've said before about God also being eternally present — I'm not so sure I agree completely, but I'm open to further consideration!)

To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....

I also agree that I am confused about the idea of Christ doing something through me and me doing something in my own strength.

In other words, these lawyers and judges would agree that the government «should bear the burden of showing that there is something deeply unreasonable about the understanding [of the moral implications of contraceptive drugs] maintained by the Greens.»

What I love about Alise is that she'll straight - up tell you what she thinks about something, but never demand that you agree.

Or to put it more bluntly, liberals believe the only people who care about something are those who agree with them.

One person says something that another doesn't agree with, so instead of having a mature conversation about it, they begin with ad hominem attacks.

David: I would agree about the «griping» thing, and that is something I try to avoid but don't always succeed.

So if you agree the waterboarding is not something Jesus would do then what about an eternity in hell?

[118] Scripture and reason agree that there is something different about humans and animals that exceeds just higher intellectual ability.

I agree about being part of the church and that being part of Jesus» message and call but maybe church and the concept of it is changing — this is certainly something that feels very real to me.

@YeaOk — Implying there's something to disagree / agree about.

At all events, nothing can gainsay this reality, on which both the Bible and anthropology agree: that there is something definitive about the commitment of one body to another in sexual congress, and from that anthropological fact the Church's teachings on sexuality must be understood.

He was caught on one of the Nixon tapes agreeing with «tricky dick» that something had to be done about getting rid of the jews ala Adolph Hitler.

But something about narrative theology (and narrative in other disciplines as well) that has inhibited its lure is how its proponents decide which narrative is preferable even within the larger whole they generally agree upon — biblical narrative.

Look, when we think about ending an early human life, this is something that is really bad for the embryo or early fetus that dies, it's losing out tremendously — I agree with that as I already said.

This judge is using the power she has to change something about the world she doesn't agree with.

Most people who believe in the concept of reasonable doubt are happy about it, even if they think he may be guilty of something beyond the stupidity of which all agree he is guilty.

«I could agree, I think, if people actually DID sacrifice something when giving up something for Lent -LSB-...] But I think that giving up chocolate in no way equals suffering, and I doubt people who do that actually think about the how and they why of it very much.»