Sentences with phrase «agree about taking»

While I agree about taking «reasonable precautions» with regard to security around the data (which depends on trusting your cloud provider to stay current with regard to appropriate security precautions) the article does not address one issue which I think has not been addressed by the cloud providers.
I agree about taking it slow, & keeping the rpm's down until all systems have warmed.
I agree about taking control back to the local level.
I completely agree about taking care of your clothes and keeping them for awhile... I have a few things that I've had for 10 + years!
I agree about taking advantage of the nice weather while we can.
I completely agree about taking an ordinary meal and pairing it with a great wine.
I agree about the taking on of players, we play everything in front unless Ozil can see a ball beyond the back - line.
I agreed about taking QB due to how rare it is we get a pick that high.

Not exact matches

The scavenger thinks Poe's story about crashing on the planet is a humorous lie and agrees to take Poe to a town with another scavenger who might be able to assist.
How about we agree that you just take my word for it (or read my book), rather than try to learn these prison leadership lessons in their natural setting?
Typically, fund managers charge a management fee of about 1.5 percent of committed capital and take 20 percent of the fund's profits assuming performance meets a returns hurdle agreed with investors.
But Google is getting serious — deadly serious — about its hardware; just recently the company agreed to acquire a phone - making unit at HTC for $ 1.1 billion, making its intent to take on the phone market known.
The fathers agreed (about 90 %) that their work is meaningful to them, and most hoped to advance in their companies and take on more responsibility.
Don't agree to partner with anyone, or take on a partner, until you are clear in your own mind and on paper about how you would choose to end your business.
Mittleman has agreed that until July 1, 2019 it won't take any actions against Aimia, including soliciting proxies, voting any shares, calling a special meeting, proposing the removal of board members, engaging in short selling or making disparaging comments about the company.
He agreed, however, that it's an open question: «We are actively asking ourselves about whether or not good governance might mean something different to family firms, and that's the next place we hope to take our research.»
«It is about time the Palestinians take the proposals and agree to come to the negotiations table or shut up and stop complaining.»
While I agree that it's important to enact policies with a goal of achieving the «greatest change,» talking to my daughter about the issues important to her also taught me that we — men, especially — should pull up a chair and hear out what changes are needed prior to taking action.
Playboy Enterprises said Monday that it had agreed to be taken private by Mr. Hefner, its founder and dominant shareholder, in a deal that values Playboy at about $ 207 million.
, to which TMM would agree, - but then again we would also note that the government has demonstrated prior ability to take on pools of toxic loans, throw them in an AMC and forget about it for quite some time (lessons for the Europeans?).
And eventually, Kendrick and the state agreed it would take about $ 38,000 to rebuild his home, which required an entire roof replacement.
They'll agree about whatyoudo with your time and once the «yes» momentum is going, more often than not they'll agree to take a more serious look at your opportunity.
Web site security and restrictions on use As a condition to your use of Services, you agree that you will not, and you will not take any action intended to: (i) access data that is not intended for you; (ii) invade the privacy of, obtain the identity of, or obtain any personal information about any other user of this web site; (iii) probe, scan, or test the vulnerability of this web site or Wellington Management's network or breach security or authentication measures without proper authorization; (iv) attempt to interfere with service to any user, host, or network or otherwise attempt to disrupt our business; or (v) send unsolicited mail, including promotions and / or advertising of products and services.
San Francisco photographer Diane Rieger, 32, said she agreed to buy the phone for a local startup, and expected to take home about $ 500 for her work.
Web site Security As a condition to your use of this Web site, you agree that you will not, and you will not take any action intended to: (i) access data that is not intended for you; (ii) invade the privacy of, obtain the identity of, or obtain any personal information about any other user of this Web site; (iii) probe, scan or test the vulnerability of this Web site or MFS» network or breach security or authentication measures without proper authorization; (iv) attempt to interfere with service to any user, host or network or otherwise attempt to disrupt our business; or (v) send unsolicited mail, including promotions and / or advertising of products and services.
I agree with about 99 % of what he said but I do take issue with the idea that when the dollar collapses, other equally leveraged and manipulated fiat currencies will not fall as well.
I appreciate that «pre-revenue» is not precisely the same as seed / startup, but if we take those as roughly equivalent, would you agree that angels invest in about 35 % x 50k = 16k seed / startup companies per year?
It takes about 80 milliseconds for the different loops in our brain to all agree on a similar story to tell our prefrontal cortex and create awareness.
That is why politicians don't really care, they wouldn't make it about believing this or that... they would simply make it about taking care of our planet ----- we should all agree on that!
Not taking up for Reality's little brother H.Sent but calling another's following of something that you might not believe or agree with as «a sheep»... does get you just about as dirty as H.Sent..
Martin might respond that my criticism is unfair because he is not asking for skepticism about those points on which historians agree; he is only asking that Christians suspend judgment about the resurrection taken as a physical, historical fact.
Certainly one can agree or disagree with Bethke's take on religion but it's difficult not to admire the way he has stirred up those of us who may have been slumbering comfortably in our own faith without really thinking about why we do what we do.
And even if all rough correlations could be made smooth by convoluted arguments about cloud covers and the like, the two Genesis accounts themselves, taken as chronologies, do not agree.
But if they are good in themselves, and if by a «point» you mean some truth about the real world which one can take out of the story, I'm not sure that I agree.
All it would have taken was one little clause: «Employee agrees to dedicate from one - half to three - quarters of her teaching time discussing why sitting in one's room and thinking vague thoughts about God while watching a tape of Dawson's Creek is not an adequate alternative for attending Mass.» And I don't mind, really I don't.
James... I can certainly agree on yr point about self - deception, but remember how long it took the «entire package «to evolve as we know it today... the first list of «our 27 NT books» doesn't appear until the latter half of the 4th century and we know that many other books (that didn't make it in) were known, read and circulated for many generations after.
He agreed, worked on many of our projects and served on our board of directors for many years — and as time went on began muttering about the dangerous direction bioethics was taking, hinting at times that the center had become part of the problem, not of the solution.
Hans von Campenhausen also agrees that «this expression may simply be used to underline the reality and apparent finality of the death itself, and say nothing beyond this».21 We may take the reference to the burial in this early formula to mean simply that there was no doubt about the death of Jesus, a necessary fact to establish if the wonder of the resurrection was to be fully appreciated.
I agree with you about the taking and the forwarding of pictures; however, I disagree that he should have fought it.
To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....
But as soon as we take our methodical philosophizing too seriously and start demanding that everyone else agree with what we have figure out about God, well, that's when theology is not longer healthy, good, or enjoyable.
Thank you and agree with you about all but not about me talking to extremes since no words would change the brainwash they went through by their imams to prepare then fighting the Russians from Afganistan... It is only responsible for adjusting that mentality is their same programers imams otherwise it would be like talking to a brick wall or tackling a camal... The main thing is that you are to take a good care of Muslims in the state and never let them grow fears from you or become jobless since such acts would assist the penetration of extremism in to their mentality... check which branches of Islam you have and mosques they operate and then read more which of all branches are the most extremes that are to be handled with care, but what I am saying not all branches of Islam be accused of extremes when only a branch or two doing all the mess.
I agree and I think that's what makes it funny: the God of this cartoon takes a break from larger scale destruction to prove the father correct about Its nature.
While most of us listen and either agree or disagree; rant about it at work the next day etc,; there are people who take it to heart and act.
Hows that working out for you so to follow your example if you walk into my store give me a $ 20 for a $ 5 item and I give you $ 5 back are you going to allow me to «followed their own belief without interfering» What about if I choose to drive on the left side of the road, kill anyone who doesn't agree with me, take residence in your residence.
Yes, I understand that and agree - a person hacking away on a computer about issues like this has to be taken with a grain of salt.
Not everyone with faith in God takes Eve as a physical being or even agrees if Moses was talking about the first Hebrew or Homo habilis.
The two agree to disagree about whether to take Mark, the cousin of Barnabas, on their second journey (Acts 15:39).
I agree with other reviewers that if you use an 8» glass dish it takes about 30 min of baking time.
And I so agree with you about taking the time to make bread at least once a week.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z