Sentences with phrase «agree about who»

Agree about who is expected to do what and when.

What's most important is that both partners agree about who does what and when.

Couples who have had an extremely difficult marriage need not agree about who is most at fault.

What is most important, explains Brittle, is that both partners agree about who does what and when.

Mothers and fathers in these households generally agree about who is more focused on work.

But old - line Protestants in the same congregation may not agree about who is considered a neighbor, or what it means to love your neighbor.

Not exact matches

Chen concedes that there are plenty of startup folks who complain about Snippets but insists that when pressed, most of the grumblers will agree that the process — despite being a minor inconvenience — beats alternative ways of monitoring staff and aligning progress.

The scavenger thinks Poe's story about crashing on the planet is a humorous lie and agrees to take Poe to a town with another scavenger who might be able to assist.

While Abudulai agrees it's generally women and people of colour who wind up having to bring diversity issues forward in the workplace, she's still happy to talk about them.

You might agree with the Times about how a wizard of Dumbledore's moral superiority should be immune to the weaknesses of human sexuality or you may side with some of Rowling's fans who think a strong gay character is leap for gay rights.

The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has agreed to release $ 2.2 million into the hands of about 45,000 of its customers who had money left on expired CBA travel money cards.

Chesky, who recently talked to Fortune about his leadership strategy, agrees, saying «It's very important that I spend my time looking over the horizon... A lot of the things I've been doing, maybe Belinda is a lot better at them than I am.»

But subsequent deals could be more far - reaching: Consumers who bought 23andMe kits and agreed to donate their genetic information to research automatically consented for 23andMe to sequence their genomes, Forbes reports, and the company says it can share anonymized, pooled information about their self - reported health traits without getting permission first.

American Media Inc., the company that owns the tabloid, agreed to pay $ 150,000 in August to Karen McDougal, who allegedly had a consensual romantic relationship with Trump in 2006, while he was married to his wife, Melania, the Journal reported, citing interviews with McDougal's friends, who say she told them about the affair.

«I will agree that there have been a significant number of smart, leading folks from the Ohio Democratic Party or who have held Ohio Democratic Party elected positions who have talked to Jerry about this,» he said.

Some 86 % of employees at the leading businesses agree that «promotions go to those who best deserve them,» compared to about three - quarters of employees at peer companies.

There's no question about it,» recalls Chris Ragan, an associate professor of economic policy at McGill University who agrees with the current austerity push.

Rather than earn revenue from subscriptions, the company would now try to make money by selling sales leads — data about readers who had agreed to share their information — to companies and universities.

Acknowledge the inappropriateness of the behavior in question: Even if you are dealing with someone who is upset about something that you think is petty, you most likely will agree on some level that the way the customer was treated was inappropriate.

Another former employee agrees that COO Dennis Woodside, who joined Dropbox about 18 months ago after leading Google's Motorola unit, has put a lot of new processes in place.

Everyone raves about the software, and i agree — but concerned there are not more folks who are delighted and talking about their mgt service.

Would it be fair to say that you agree with Martin Feldstein (who did not sign the letter) that these tax cuts will not pay for themselves and, in fact, would add about over $ 1 trillion to the debt over the next decade?

because we had made product commitments to a large customer who was about to agree to a nationwide rollout.

There is no hardfork proposal in sight from the people who agreed to this pact and bitcoin is still stuck with the exact same transaction limit it has had since the limit was put in place about 6 years ago.

I agree that consumers shouldn't have to think about who's a fiduciary, it should just happen.

It may have been intended to encourage more angel investment by the end of the year, but most of the folks I know who've thought about it agree that, if spurring additional angel and startup investment was the desired impact, the break would really need to be in place permanently, or for a longer period of time.

Supporters of an FTA with China, meanwhile, are more likely than opponents to agree that it would give Canada a competitive edge in the global market, whereas Canadians who are uncertain about China's economic prospects tend not to support an FTA with China.

On July 17, 2015, JPMC agreed to pay $ 388 million to settle claims by investors who alleged that JPMC misled them about the safety of $ 10 billion worth of residential mortgage backed securities.

Jean - Baptiste Su, a Forbes contributor who writes about the business of technology from Silicon Valley, agrees that Yahoo's telecommuting ban is a big mistake.

While economists can agree that trade liberalization benefits economies at the macro level, at the micro level there are always those who see welfare gains, and those whose immediate welfare is reduced as a result of the (necessary) changes in the economy brought about by greater overall efficiencies.

I am a Christian who attends a Pentecostal church, but I'm pretty liberal in my views as well and don't always agree with my fellow Christians about certain heavier topics.

When I challenged him over how that could be possible, he answered, I don't know; I just know that there will be no sorrow in heaven, so we'll understand and agree with God about who deserves to be in hell, and rejoice in His holy decision.»

I agree, used to be that this was easily distinguishable... it's hard to tell who's just playing the game called «church» and who is «sincere» about the following of God.

If you met people who spoke badly of your mother or had wrong opinions about her you did not agree with, would that cause you to stop loving her?

As someone who has sat by the death bed of a sister, father and mother, I full heartily agree that those looking into the thin veil that separates the living and dead, think about their loved ones not God.

Regarding your comment about people dying because they can't agree on who or what God is, I share your frustration and sadness.

Agree with him or not, this is a man who's not about to be stumped.

He's the one that started all the vitriol — after 20 + years of 3 hours a day, 5 days a week of constant complaining about anyone who didn't agree with him, people get tired of hearing it.

I agree, though I will say their are christians who actually do help the poor and sick - real christians that no one every hears about mainly because real christians, unlike Camping, don't seek praise or attention and don't do things to gain anything.

They will, predictably, be cheered by those who agree, denounced by those who disagree (because they «go too far,» or «don't go far enough»), and ignored by everybody else, which is just about everybody.

I also agree that it is not a book of science, the way I see it, the Bible is a way for us to learn about God and one of the ways He uses to talk to us, and to be honest, I don't really pay attention to the evolution theory or any other theories, if it really happened or not (or if it keeps on happening), is fine by me, I respect those who believe them to be true.

So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

Agreed, save I thought the adultress (of «let he who is without sin throw the first stone» fame) was added to John in about 700 AD, not Matthew, no?

I agree that God didn't pursue Adam to smash his face in, never suggested that or alluded to it, but there is no confusion where sin leads and there is no doubt about the consequences off those who love their lives, they will lose it where as those that hate their lives will find it... So to conclude, Jesus and the father are not two different things, they are both the very same in as much as God desires all to be saved and has shown the way to salvation.

It's not like a thousand eyewitness accounts of an event, where they'd vary in the details but generally agree on the most important aspects, it's more like a thousand people who were asked to right a short story about anything they wanted.

«I'd have to agree with that,» said Savage, who'd just suggested, apparently mostly joking, that «abortion should be mandatory for about thirty years» because «there's too many [rude word deleted] people on the planet.»

Certainly one can agree or disagree with Bethke's take on religion but it's difficult not to admire the way he has stirred up those of us who may have been slumbering comfortably in our own faith without really thinking about why we do what we do.

In sum, our reporter friend and those like him should not feel guilty about agreeing with Steele, Loury, Crouch, and other writers who are waking us up to the disastrous consequences of policies promoted under the banner of «civil rights.»

most modern christans who know the Bible realize about knowledge of God... those who argue for faithh in His exidstance and use Hebrews 11: 1 are just ripping it out of the Bible and ignoring the rest of Hebrews 11... as to agreeing with Paul..

While I agree with the first statement, I have reservations about the second, and prefer instead to hold an agnostic yet optimistic view concerning those who have never heard the gospel or who subscribe to other religions.