Yes,
I agree as believers we should have a relationship with poor.
Not exact matches
There's no doubt, (and I think Johnny would absolutely
agree) that they went to Vancouver
as skeptics and came home
as believers that an early exit was the way to go.
Passing off Jewish writers» words about love and peace
as his own but then ordering his stupid
believers to kill anyone that doesn't
agree with him.
I don't
agree with him, but I don't think he's delusional, and I think he's the kind of
believer that all atheists would be pretty comfortable with
as opposed to the «the church is always right» variety.
Read his manifesto «quran» and you will notice it says stuff like «allah wants the heads removed of all non
believers» and «if you are friends with a Jew your punishments will be the same
as theirs» and «if your wife acts highhanded (mind of her own) you must beat her until she
agrees with you» and I could go on and on and on.
I
agree with @Luke in his post
as far
as peer pressure, and potentially opening yourself to abuse and ridicule by «
believers» should you not comply.
While I
agree,
as a non
believer of the cross, I have no problem giving respect and recognition to others faith.
Most of them
agree on this, with the possible exception of people who believe in multiple gods, but
as you examine the beliefs of more and more religions what you find are
believers who «know» contradictory things.
But
as it is, they all
agree on the math and chemistry they utilize, but the
believers among them believe in various different gods and doctrines and what not.
Out of all the postings on this site today, I found «Derp's «post the most fascinating and informative,
as well
as deeply revealing.Even after boasting of what seems to be a practically perfect live by any measure, he informs us that he takes pleasure in mocking and ridiculing those of faith who are presumably his opposite; I can only wonder if, given all his supposed accomplishments, he is smart enough to realize how deeply revealing of his true character his remarks are.
As a
believer, I rarely engage in arguments with my atheist friends, and like to think I wouldn't lower myself to the level of juvenile name - calling and personal attacks against whatever my atheist friends hold dear.Most of the time we simply
agree to disagree; when they hold forth with misinformation or ignorance on their assumed «knowledge «of my faith, I try to gently correct them; I certainly don't allow any disagreements we have to devolve into hateful insults and name - calling.
Gary: I think I
agree with your point that «if 1 man and 1 woman was a normal teaching of Paul's» for all
believers, then it follows that the text either means «this is only for the elders and higher positions» OR that the text was referring to some other situation, such
as marrying a divorced woman.
I'll leave it to you to figure out your error, but I will
agree that you can use the statistics to show that
believers have fewer abortions than non-
believers as a percentage of each population.
Although,
as a
believer, I appreciate some of the article's perspectives on the relationship between science and faith, I do not
agree that the Big Bang vs Steady State distinction offers any proof of God.
I often wonder why
believers such
as yourself assume that just because someone posts something that you don't
agree with or don't like, that that must * mean * they are unhappy, miserable (in this case), no life, etc...?
Despite humouring you by using logic to demonstrate that your god,
as characterized by
believers, can not exist because the characteristics are contradictory, we
agree that no one will ever be able to prove that god does not exist.
I think we
agree on the fact that it is by faith that all are saved i have no problem with that and its in that that there is unity.You find within any christian modern church law can be mixed with Grace that is not peculiar to any domination maybe it is more extreme in some.Where there are
believers there are works of the flesh such
as pride and self reliance.I was thinking today the word says if we believe in our hearts and confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord then you shall be saved.Its not a hard doctrine to believe thats in its basic form.The seventh day have tacked on to that belief adherence to the sabbath that is sadly how denominations spring up.In the anglican church we still recite the apostles creed how many church still do that today
as a basis for there faith in Jesus Christ.Your statement that some are saved is just
as true to those who go to modern christian churchs who say they are christian but walk according to the flesh..
I understand and
agree with you Toby, however Christians and other religion were not the only ones who carried out acts of violence, Atheists famous people did
as well, You see it doesn't matter if your a
believer or not, people are imperfect and we created an imperfect world because of our imperfections.
Craig i
agree totally church should be a slice of heaven on earth that is where corporately
as believers come into the prescence of God.Its good when worshiping the Lord to feel his prescence and to feel connected to others because of Jesus.We had our carol service yesterday i was involved in the choir we combined with other churchs in the area it was a good turnout and alot of fun singing
as we celebrated the birth of Jesus.It really makes christmas for me.If we love Jesus that should spill out into every area of our lives.He is the one that impacts others through us
as we rely on him daily.Merry Christmas to you and your family regards brentnz
Though on a gut level I
agree with you, I am a firm
believer that even someone
as crass and seemingly vile
as this man has a right to express his opinion.
As believers in Christ, however, we have much that we can
agree upon: love, sacrifice, compassion, hope, joy, grace, redemption, reconciliation, and renewal are values that bind us together.
Well, I
agree in concept, except the liberal
believers tend not to want to codify religious beliefs into law, being
as they understand the difference between church and state.
As a
believer, I must
agree with your thinking.
When a
believer bit.ches and moans about how if gay marriage is legalized, next is polygamy, in.cest and beastiality, (because for some reason all of those things are related) and we reject that because 1) beastiality is stupid because we're talking about two consenting adults 2) Polygamy is not really immoral but just incredibly tricky legally to design docu.ments that would make sense and 3) inc.est has some scientific ramifications and most of us can
agree that
as far
as icky se.xual stuff goes, that ones a doozy.
Whatever we perceive to be the truth about God, I think there is some things we all can
agree on,
believers and anyone who doesn't believe in the existence of God and that is that it is self evident that all are born equal and with dignity and it's best if everyone relate to each other
as part of the human family.
A True
Believer reads the scriptures or their foundational texts
as is, no context except their own, and condemns those who don't
agree with * their * Actual True And Nonnegotiable Doctrine.
I also like the fact that I have the ability to fellowship with
believers from different denominations now, even when I don't
agree with everything they do, instead of separating from them all,
as fundamentalists preach.
As for hearing sounds of a deceased dog... not sure how that ties into anything thats being discussed at the moment (dogs, by the way are generally
agreed by most
believers that they don't have souls so...) but hearing something like that is still explainable without having to insert a «spritual realm» answer to explain it.
Even
as a «
believer» I completely
agree that one shouldn't adhere to a faith, solely because it is the more «convenient» thing to believe.
Totally
agree with you Khan... but
as you can see there are still «
believers» in Ox..
I tend to
agree (for the most part) and am a firm
believer that when a child is truly ready to potty train his failures can be
as impressionable and motivating
as his successes.
But
as soon
as faced with a «
believer» I run a mile from
agreeing.
As to religion, I
agree with you; people's choices and faith are their own business, and there is no reason why faith and reality need be in conflict until a
believer begins to invent a god that encourages them to impose on others.
Stephen Sackur: «Do you think the American people
agree with President Trump when he tweets,
as he has n the last few years in fact
as this is a consistent thought of his, that global warming is «a hoax» «I am not a
believer,» he has said.
She is a strong
believer that a resume should not only act
as an introduction of one's self to an employer, but a «teaser» so that they want to find out more and hence
agree to meet with them in person.