Sentences with phrase «agree in»

It's not too often that we agree in everything but I said he had learn this and that, don't make this too difficult, and he said, «Yes, I know.»

If we all actually agree in everything, we wouldn't be here as we will be parroting each other.

I» v always said i respect peoples views simply because its your right, most time people may not agree in a perfect world they would, always.

agreed until there, as far as lacazette i havent seen enough of him, but i do agree in the essence of what is needed

But agree in that Quintero is too quick for him, another reason why he should have forced him to the spot he would not shoot.

I agree in some aspect but until we face and big teams this season you don't know if things have changed.

I agree in general about width — but it is not exactly a new phenomena at Arsenal under Wenger.

I agree in terms of confidence that Arsenal players are more confident now after the international tournament.

Si, I agree in terms of the coaching in Dallas... if you cant know ahead of time how will bebthere and who wont and fix it, youre probably gonna have a tough time getting to the end game.

Let us know if you agree in the comments!

Well I actually agree him in some points.

I agree in general so thumbed up but wilshires first touch is excellent certainly one of best English players in that department it's his third or fourth touch where there are problems...

Whist I agree in the most part with Galen we have 2 very talented deep lying midfielders Ramsey and Cazorla).

I agree in theory, you give him up and Bev, Bradley, Leonard, Gallo, DJ or Trezz looks pretty good... but all three of Bev, Bradley, Leonard are currently not playing because they have fairly serious stuff and that is to not even broach the subject of Gallo and let's not forget Milos achy feet.

Further, the report claims that Barcelona will not increase their previous offer of $ 80m up front with an additional $ 30m in bonuses, and so if Liverpool weren't willing to agree in the summer, then why would they change their mind in January?

I saw the article on JUst Arsenal about Arsene Wenger and his decision to mkae only two changes to the Arsenal XI for the home game against Everton today and I must say that I agree in general with the point that it was a really risky move from the Prof.... Read the full article here

I agree in part.

I'll agree in hindsight he should have been subbed.

This is really $ hit because nothing in the team happens without the boss to agree IN THE FIRST PLACE.

but I agree in challenging a refs decision during a game it won't change anything they made a decision and it's final but all in all refs need to show a little respect to footballers, managers as well they aren't children they're grown men this is football not secondary school.

I agree in principle to davidnz «s comment with an additional pointI.INJURIES.

I have to agree in a way because I wrote an article saying something similar about our luck recently.

I agree in some ways that wenger had to rotate but we are only 5 or so weeks into the season, players cant be needing that much of a rest when the mid week games have just begun?

I saw the article on JUst Arsenal about Arsene Wenger and his decision to mkae only two changes to the Arsenal XI for the home game against Everton today and I must say that I agree in general with the point that it was a really risky move from the Prof.

I do agree in ability terms we've got weak links and we should upgrade, but if we had the right attitude, then as Leicester show, what we have, should be enough.

But I agree in that refs should be trained more.

While I agree in full and share the same frustrations, I find it hard to blame Wenger in this case.

Arsene Wenger this week insisted that the sale of Robin Van Persie to Old Trafford of six seasons ago was worse than the current transfer, and you have to agree in all honesty.

I find it odd Jon that you of all people it did not touch one hair or fibre, not even the slightest commonality even if you don't agree in full.

I don't agree in Woj's case.

I agree in the fact that C.A.F.E. standard consider relevant ecological issues that implies the production of coffee beans.

At other points they do not agree in order but have common materials.

Matthew and Luke rarely agree in their wording when they provide introductions to Q sayings, and it seems likely that in the original Q such introductions were usually very short, i.e. «And Jesus said», or not present at all.

Matthew and Luke agree in order at points where they are following Mark.

The hard - core Christians might agree in both cases, but I would say that in both cases it's none of Broussard's business.

All agree in naming Mary Magdalene as a witness.

Hence Marx and Teilhard agree in their prediction of the absolute totality of the future society but differ in their attitudes toward the role of Christianity in its ultimate achievement.

; John and Luke agree in many details of the Passion and Resurrection, e.g. Jn.

Recently, and in particular through the sympathetic pen of Aldous Huxley, an effort has been made to formulate and crystallize, in a series of abstract propositions, the basis of a common philosophy on which all men of goodwill can agree in order that the world may continue to progress.

Theists also agree in ascribing to God the attributes of personhood.

Although giving different descriptions of the two sides, they do, in fact, agree in their description of the parties involved in conflict.

From the standpoint of the «orders of creation,» both the Bible and anthropology agree in asserting the primacy of the family among all social relations.

Bultmann would agree in principle.

Holding in abeyance for the present the matter of decision regarding the pacifist issue, let us assume that thoughtful Christians will for the most part agree in what has been said thus far.

Then we agree IN ADVANCE on a subject to be prayed for that has to be such that natural causes or mere probablility can not be the cause.

We all agree in the obligation of the moral principles of Jesus and nowhere will they be found delivered in greater purity than in His discourses.

In the Bible it says if any two agree in «My Name» «I will answer».

Men and women of all ages and political affiliations need to agree in their heads that change is needed, and then put that into practice through consumer and other decisions.

They agree in the first part of it: «Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death»; but the final clause appears in three different forms.

But there are countless millions of people who would agree in a second that God loves them, but who do not for a second believe that God likes them.