Remember, if you don't
agree on all of these questions it's okay.
Not exact matches
Mostly it poses the
question of what do you do with a country where we simply just can't get along — where we are at a political impasse so profound that we can't
agree on simple
questions, much less passing a budget?
May 1 - Jacob Jacobson
agreed to resign as Xerox Corp's chief executive as part
of a settlement
of a lawsuit brought by the company's shareholders that raised
questions over Xerox's
agreed deal with Japan's Fujifilm Holdings Corp, a New York court filing showed
on Tuesday.
With that
question, Kent and I finally found something to
agree on other than the value
of watching classic quiz shows and playing country music.
In particular, consider the following
question: Can you think
of a market in any item where each item was priced perfectly, so that every (rational) person
agreed on its value?
Acknowledge the inappropriateness
of the behavior in
question: Even if you are dealing with someone who is upset about something that you think is petty, you most likely will
agree on some level that the way the customer was treated was inappropriate.
Blatt
agreed with James» sentiment, saying, «No
question, this summer we looked for and identified ways that we can take advantage
of Kev's unique skill set, and hopefully we'll see that
on the floor.»
The two chief critics, Postol and Richard Lloyd
of Tesla Laboratory Inc., don't
agree on Iron Dome's failure rate, calling into
question the accuracy
of their results.
April 2018 — Zuckerberg
agrees to give testimony in front
of US politicians — but continues to ignore calls to appear before UK politicians to answer
questions about the role
of fake news
on its platform and the potential use
of Facebook data in the UK's Brexit referendum
A full six pages
of Benchmark's lawsuit were dedicated to describing Kalanick's role in the Otto acquisition and Benchmark's obliviousness to alleged wrongdoing; I noted when the lawsuit was filed that it, more than any
of Uber's scandals, had the potential to be Kalanick's doom, and apparently Benchmark
agrees (although,
of course, one should
question why Gurley, then an Uber board member, apparently declined to do more digging
on a $ 680 million acquisition).
In my experience, working with sales and marketing to identify and
agree on the
questions that constitute each stage (or sub-stage)
of the buying process can be a powerful aligning force, getting everyone to realize that buying is a buyer - driven process, and to
agree that there are things that need to happen before you can expect to close the sale, today, regardless
of where the buyer is in the process.
Trade experts say significant obstacles to a Trans - Pacific deal remain, including the
question of whether Japan, which is deeply protectionist
on some fronts, will
agree to major concessions.
«One important policy
question on which most economists appear to
agree, however, is that there is very little to be said in favour
of taxing corporations.1 Many would
agree, for example, that the title
of a recent paper — «The Corporate Income Tax and How to Get Rid
of It» (Vickrey, 1991)-- adequately conveys the main message
of the extensive economic literature
on this subject.
Global television stations were offered interviews with Harper
on the condition they
agree to the subject
of the
questions they would be permitted to ask.
On the
question of whether public funding for elite private schools that charge more than $ 10,000 per year per student in tuition should be eliminated, 75 per cent
of respondents
agreed and more than half, 53 per cent,
agreed strongly.
We define them as those who responded «
Agree» or «Strongly
Agree» to three
questions: «Risk management is an integral part
of our investment process and actively addressed
on a systematic, ongoing basis», «My organization has a strong risk management culture», and «I am confident that our portfolio has appropriate downside protection for the next tail event.»
Saudi Arabia's energy minister, Khalid al - Falih, also re-invigorated the market
on Monday saying he was optimistic that major oil producers will
agree to cut production by November, and that $ 60 - a-barrel prices were not out
of the
question.
Since late December, talks between Trump and Mueller lawyers have tried to
agree on a time limit for an interview, where it would take place and the scope
of questioning.
David... I
agree with you wholeheartedly that we need fishon's voice
on here but I also think he needs to be held to the same standards as everyone else... this is supposed to be dialogue but if he's backed into a corner he comes out with a barrage
of questions that are sort
of related but avoids answering
questions himself.
On these and other
questions of great importance, we are not
agreed.
Religious Differences
on the
Question of Evolution (United States) Percentage who
agree that evolution is the best explanation for the origin
of human life
on earth Atheist / Agnostic 87 % Buddhist 81 % Hindu 80 % Secular unaffiliated 77 % Jewish 77 % Catholic 58 % Religious unaffiliated 55 % Orthodox 54 % Mainline Protestant 51 % Muslim 45 % Hist.
Unless both sides can
agree to meet certain minimum standards
of decency that transcend
questions of «what side are you
on,» things will only get worse.
Don't you ever
question how the bible conveniently
agrees with you
on the issues
of the day?
When the post-modernist argues that justice is a game we play; a set
of rules two or more people
agree upon as the frame within which to carry
on their social intercourse (see, for instance, JG), the discussion shifts from a celebration
of various uniqueness to the difficult
question of how they interact.
In his fair and generally sympathetic review
of my book Bergson and Modern Physics, David Sipfle raised some important and significant
questions which clearly show how extremely complex the
questions concerning the nature
of time are and how difficult it is to
agree on their solutions even for those who share a basic philosophical view.
From just these six telling arguments I would argue that Calvinism is overcome»... but to
question Calvin is to
question only a man... Paul
on occasion
questioned the leading Apostle Peter so if you think it is out
of line to
question so august a name as Calvin, then you must not
agree with Paul
on his direct criticism
of Peter either.
On the formal
question, however, I
agree with the rejection
of natural theology as defined above.
Yet they largely
agreed with the fundamentalists
on such
questions as biblical inerrancy, the Virgin birth and the physical resurrection
of Jesus.
Just ask a simple
question (its a
question that everyone would
agree on that the
question is the exact one to ask to get the truth) and by the answer (yes or no) given by the most knowledgeable / high positioned persons
of that religion, you will eliminate every religion except Christianity.
I also must leave aside the
question why theologians
on both sides could not
agree, or at least thought they could not
agree, about the subject
of justification.
The reform
of canon law is still far away... in short, there is nothing like a new Pentecost to be noticed, but rather quarrels and alienation among Catholics themselves, new unsolved
questions in theology as well as in Christian living
on which we had seemed to be
agreed before the Council, the continuing silent apostasy
of the masses, the rejection
of faith, Christian morality and conviction in public life.
i
agree with you richard... i was
questioning my own lack
of sensitivity and suggesting that we need to be sensitive
on a global scale also... i said it badly.
At a recent gathering hosted by The Samuel Bronfman Foundation, which asked precisely that
question, just about the only thing the group
of leading Jewish scholars, writers, rabbis, and professors could
agree on was that there is no longer one story, narrative, or idea that could hold the totality or even a majority
of Jews together.
In those periods when clear - cut ideas
of the ministry prevailed pastors and people were relatively
agreed on the acceptable answer to the
question: By what authority do you do these things, i.e., preach, care for souls, preside over the church and administer the sacraments?
(I
agree with Pete below
on the line
of questioning being shameful.)
For myself, I
agree with what Whitehead remarked in the quotation at the end
of this chapter: the
question is reduced to a state
of irrelevancy when we come to understand that the greater glory
of God (which is God's continuing activity in love, not proud assertion
of the divine self) is the goal giving its profound significance to what goes
on in the world.
Don't
agree with second premise, and believe that is your interpretation
of some future, falsely presumed, last day, but MY last day
on this earth, this is an excellent
question.
Yet the persistent tendency
of conservatives to rely
on doctrinal tests raises the
question of whether they
agree with the Reformers» insistence that the church itself must submit to the judgment
of God and must avoid an imperial and authoritarian stance.
question by Sinsinawa Dominican Sister Erica Jordan, who not - so - subtly suggested that Ryan's approach to healthcare reform, tax reform, and welfare reform was in conflict with the Church's social teaching, the very Catholic Speaker replied that he completely
agreed with Sister Erica that God is «always
on the side
of the poor and dispossessed»; the real
question was, how do public officials, who are not God, create public policies that empower the poor and dispossessed to be not - poor and not - dispossessed?
An official doctrine
of the Church does not lose its binding authority only because some theologian expresses — whether in a book, an essay, a lecture,
on the radio or in television — an opinion
of which another Catholic can not understand how it is compatible with the doctrine
of the Church; and mostly the theologian in
question will not have tried very hard to show how it can
agree with it.
President Obama and the Republicans did not
agree on very much over the last two years, but
on the
question of what this election was all about there was not an inch
of daylight between them — at least when the campaign began.
And yes, you're talking about a single event that happened thousands
of years ago
on a single day And I meant the later, when I ask
question, they are generally honest
questions, but back to the point, you
agreed with me
on every, because you assumed that at least part
of the story was true, but who is the everyone you were referring to?
-- «And I meant the later, when I ask
question, they are generally honest
questions, but back to the point, you
agreed with me
on every, because you assumed that at least part
of the story was true...»
Whatever the nature
of the various God's in
question, I suspect one thing every adherent would
agree on is that there is no imperfection in that being.
Both Pelagius and Augustine had
agreed that the great majority
of the human race were damned; they differed only
on the
question of the basis
of that damnation.
(i) the
question of gay rights — funny I
agree with gay rights, must be a political debate at its heart (ii) a wonan's right to choose — funny I
agree with this, see above thought (iii) teaching evolution in school — again I
agree (iv) my ability to buy a glass
of wine
on Sunday — definitely politics here (v) immunizing teens against HPV — got my kids immunized, not even politics here (vi) population control — this is religions fault??? no this is cultural (vii) assisted suicide at end
of life —
agree with that, still have my religion (viii) global warmning —
agree it needs to get fixed, doesn't have anything to do with religion
On the
question of whether same - sex marriage should be legal, only 20 percent
of evangelicals who say they have no gay or lesbian friends
agree.
On this
question the speculative theologian
agrees with the rationalist theologian (within, say, process theology), for one
of the deepest commitments
of the rationalist theologian is to generality as it is revealed in logical thought.
@hippypoet «jesus WAS a person sure, as far as the son
of this god «person» well thats another one
of those notions that can ONLY be taken
on faith which i am not discussing» = >
agreed, the
question is whether or not Jesus was divine.
Hence we are,
on the one hand, confronted with an abundance
of material, rich in analysis and content from a variety
of perspectives that can offer to the Indian church sensitive viewpoints and creative directions for the understanding and practice
of mission in India today, and,
on the other, still confronted with the reality that, in so far as the mission
question is concerned, an
agreed upon standpoint, either in theological or practical terms continues to be elusive.