Sentences with phrase «agree on anything at»

Beyond accepting that man is reliant on the Earth and its systems, and that looking after it is in our own self interest, it's hard to get environmentalists to agree on anything at all.

Beyond agreeing to stab America in the back they can't seem to agree on anything at these climate talks.

The bad news for believers, if there is any, is surely the failure of the more sober scholars to reach a consensus on the historical Jesus: if they agree on anything at all, it is that the Gospels can not be taken for historical or biographical accounts of what the Jesus of history said, did and suffered.

Not exact matches

Sure, you may not be selling anything right at the moment, but you are selling the prospect on why they should trust you and why they should agree to an appointment setting with you.

The truth is that the only things the stories agree on it that someone went to the tomb and claimed it was empty There is absolutely no agreement on anything else, which discredits even the claim that Mary went there at it was empty — too many lies.

In a somewhat different vein, Tracy and Lash, while agreeing that the anthropic principle is untenable in science, find a certain kind of anthropocentrism appropriate in theology: (1) human beings are both products of and interpreters of the evolutionary process; (2) human beings are responsible for much of our world's ills: «if we are the «center» of anything, we are the center of «sin,» of the self - assertive disruption and unraveling of the process of things, at least on our small planet» (Tracy and Lash, 280).

I was incredibly vulnerable and if I had noticed ANYTHING out of the ordinary that was a «sign» I probably would have seized it and then who knows, I might be on this blog agreeing with everything you're saying (to some extent at least, as I grew up Jewish, so I think we'd still be at odds, just slightly less so).

This abstract thinking applies at many levels — I am not singling out faith - based aspects, but I find myself agreeing with Nye that building a person up from a young age based on non-fact-based anything is a bad idea.

For the latter not only is it the case, as Hartshorne would agree, that every finite individual owes its existence to the free creative activity of God, in the sense that apart from that creative activity that individual would not exist; in addition, it is wholly due to the free creative activity of God that anything other than Himself exists: it is contingent, and contingent on the will of God, that any created world at all exists.

but i didn't state anything example — i stated that the theory of evolution is yet to be proved and so with that i agree that due to that lacking it is equal to the theory of god... the only thing i said which is cemented truth for anything is that we don't know what the real answer is... and by stating ideas as facts serves no real purpose but a selfish one... lets call it an ease - ment on the inner self, the mind can now be at peace with the hope that when i die i get to live yet again... full belief in this is insane without evidence.

(i) the question of gay rights — funny I agree with gay rights, must be a political debate at its heart (ii) a wonan's right to choose — funny I agree with this, see above thought (iii) teaching evolution in school — again I agree (iv) my ability to buy a glass of wine on Sunday — definitely politics here (v) immunizing teens against HPV — got my kids immunized, not even politics here (vi) population control — this is religions fault??? no this is cultural (vii) assisted suicide at end of life — agree with that, still have my religion (viii) global warmning — agree it needs to get fixed, doesn't have anything to do with religion

Hence, while I believe that Griffin has every right to maintain that free - will theodicies are implausible and to encourage us to agree, I see no reason why I, or any other FWT, needs to admit (at least on the basis of anything that Griffin has argued) that FWTs can not defend themselves successfully against the claim that free - will theism «can not provide a plausible theodicy.»

I guess on that we'll have to agree to disagree, I find it annoying and dumb to mass post a dumb video that gets taken down soon after when it has nothing to do with the topic at hand and the person posting doesn't have anything whatsoever to contribute.

Arsenal are recovering and slowly getting back some confidence and fluidity in their game, played 120 mins on sunday and needed to rotate various players who were obviously not fully recovered and who were certain» red flags» for muscular injuries if theyd started (ie, ox, ramsey, holding) Leicester did not deserve anything at all, they were ultra defensive, yes worked hard I agree but its easier to defend with 9 behind the ball for vast periods of the game.

Ks - Gunner totally agree with you, we will always be short on winning anything major, it's a business plan they have at Arsenal and not a trophy wining one

Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey - Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility

How will you assure members and the public that Labour MPs will never again become so dissociated from reality and so institutionalised by Westminster that they do anything on a par with home flipping, expenses rigging, agree to lobby for money or do anything at all that brings the party into disrepute?

In retrospect, I am sure most people at the BBC will agree with Ben Rich that they should «have done anything to get that footage on air».

Ever been out on a date with someone you met at a bar because they seemed nice, or you reluctantly agreed to go on a blind date suggested by your co-worker because you were assured you'd enjoy it, only to find out on the date that you really don't have anything in common?

I agree with you on on that one, the problem is I did nt have any bleach so my curiousity got the better of me and my god my ears where bleeding after listneing to him spew on and on about «well thats what I heard» every second.Its almost like he likes to listen to himself talk over and over like a broken record.Unfortunatley his information sounds as credible as a 10 year old watching sesame street and thinking Oscar the grouch is real.I do nt think we have anything to worry about other then a few little kinks you get at any launch of any game or console.

The various news reports cast very conflicting slants on the outcome, some saying that the US caved in by agreeing to anything at all.

I agree that the latest e-mail release will probably not shift anything much at all (unless there's some kind of explosive, Black Swan - like revelation that no - one's picked up on yet, buried in the depths of the file.)

if you will argue with me on my results that we did not see anything catastrophic happening around 1972, when we also had a standstill, in the speed of warming, I would agree with that but remember this was at the height of warming causing more natural clouds and moisture.

And if you've ever tried to order pizza for more than three at a time, you know that getting a room of people to agree on anything is tough.

While I agree that Muller's op - ed piece in the Wall Street Journal seems to be tooting his own horn quite a bit... But on the positive side, to have the Wall Street Journal editorial page publish anything that is arguing for, not against, at least some aspect of the scientific consensus on climate change is a step forward!

As to whether there is a serious issue to be tried, Justice Belzil notes that the parties agree that the Suncor site is dangerous, but they do not agree on anything else (at para 51).

Of course, with an increased susceptibility to a 51 % attack and only a small number of developers actually building anything on ethereum classic, not everyone agrees that classic ethers could be valuable at all.

But, these situations call for both parties to agree to arbitration at a time when it is less likely they will agree on anything.