Sentences with phrase «agree on anything other»

I could fill a large hotel full of the most World's most «learnerd» Jewish, Christian and Islamic theological scholars (to take the, inaptly named, monothistic religions) and they would be unable to agree on anything other than some nauseating throw away line like «we should all rewspect each other's views»».

«Until 50 Republican Senators can agree on anything other than judges,» Cowen's Krueger said Friday, «we will remain on our lonely island that believes the Congressional GOP will fail on taxes.»

Not exact matches

While it's a shock to get 89 percent of people to agree on anything (smaller numbers agree that the earth goes around the sun and not the other way around, for instance), the fact that working together is less lonely than working apart is hardly a world - shaking revelation.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, if Thing Daemon believes in its discretion that your sale or any products, services, content or other materials in the listing or on Thing Daemon's servers may create liability for Thing Daemon or harm other users of the Services, then you agree that Thing Daemon may take any actions with respect to the content or materials or listing that Thing Daemon believes are prudent or necessary to minimize or eliminate our potential liability or to protect other users of our Services.

Can you see why equality under the law and equal rights for everyone means throwing out the bias of religion, as none of them agree with the others on anything.

@ 0G - No gods, ghosts, goblins or ghouls — agreed the Bible says that — but strangely - every culture on this planet in no way recognizes that marriage is anything other than a man and a woman.

I would agree except other nationalities / religions try to strip me of my beliefs... we can't say prayer in school anymore, we can't say Merry Christmas, they don't want «In God We Trust» on anything, they want us to remove the 10 Commandments... if they want us to respect their beliefs... RESPECT OURS!

For the latter not only is it the case, as Hartshorne would agree, that every finite individual owes its existence to the free creative activity of God, in the sense that apart from that creative activity that individual would not exist; in addition, it is wholly due to the free creative activity of God that anything other than Himself exists: it is contingent, and contingent on the will of God, that any created world at all exists.

Hence, while I believe that Griffin has every right to maintain that free - will theodicies are implausible and to encourage us to agree, I see no reason why I, or any other FWT, needs to admit (at least on the basis of anything that Griffin has argued) that FWTs can not defend themselves successfully against the claim that free - will theism «can not provide a plausible theodicy.»

The promise that comes next in Matthew (18:19) resembles other Matthean sayings: «Again I say to you, if two of you agree on earth about anything they ask, it will be done for them by my Father in heaven.»

Perhaps the internet is doing all of the above and more: encouraging and unifying small religious and other movements; further facilitating scientific unification across geographic proximity, if not also creating new scientific theories and concepts; fostering the rise of new forms of spiritual irrationalism such as those discussed in Wendy Kaminer's wild book, Sleeping with Extra-Terrestrials; focusing the public even more on particular public personas in news, sports and everything else; creating new classes of investors who are willing to publish online just about anything, regardless of whether or not they agree with it; germinating new technological ideas that are luring capitalists who hold unreasonable expectations of financial bonanzas.

All I am trying to do is give an opinion and hear some positive feedback on if other people agree / disagree with anything i said.

Your» e always on here shouting to the rafters about Wenger out and putting down people that don't agree with your brand of idiocy but you don't have anything worthwhile to say other than to berate people who don't want to think like you.

I agree with you please not taken anything away form Ozil who kept putting it on a plate but Giroud showed the other side of him in just bringing down headers in dangerous places..

Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey - Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility

climb back in your hole lockay its boring cant think of anything more original than to slate other fans as delusional,,, so tired of this little clan on here and your opinions that have to be agreed with,,, beating man city was something to be happy about,, fact,, the amount of fans on here saying we can never beat the big teams when we do then were delusional for being pleased,, weird

Examples include one sleeping upstairs, the other downstairs; agreeing on a schedule of time with the kids; agreeing to separate financial obligations other than those that impact the family (mortgage, insurance payments, etc.); agreeing that in their free time, they can go anywhere, see anyone and do anything they wish; that each can have another relationship but that no one is introduced to the kids without prior permission.

«You have all sorts of settlements made on the proviso that nobody says anything about it and the woman has to agree to confidentiality and then it's paid for by funds that come from other than the perpetrator,» he said.

People lump together on the right anyone from staunchly anti-religious «sex maniac» Ayn Rand to «Family Values» Christian fundamentalists some of whom literally wouldn't agree with Randian Objectivists about anything other than statists / Communists being a common opponent.

The other trends, that will land you on What Not to Wear if you're over 40, would be maxi skirts, pants that say anything on the butt (guess I agree with that) and certain light, short, flimsy dresses.

If you are on a tight budget, you can agree with your spouse not to give anything to each other, or a $ 20 limit.

Especially look for; Late payments, charge - offs, collections or other negative items that aren't yours, Accounts listed as «settled,» «paid derogatory,» «paid charge - off» or anything other than «current» or «paid as agreed» if you paid on time and in full, Accounts that are still listed as unpaid that were included in a bankruptcy, Negative items older than seven years (10 in the case of bankruptcy) that should have automatically fallen off your report (you must be careful with this last one, because sometimes scores actually go down when bad items fall off your report.

The reason is that there are so many risks: government regulations of short - selling (SEC Rule 204), special government regulations put in place during market panics (e.g. the 2008 SEC ban on short selling financials), forced buy - ins, unlimited losses, debt to the brokerage, interest one is charged for being short which can vary arbitrarily, brokerages could change margin requirements to any arbitrary amount, arbitration clauses, you agree to indemnify the brokerage for anything it did even if it did the wrong thing, some brokerages also do market - making and thus have further incentive to fleece the client, and all the other «screw you» legal language that you agreed to when opening an account.

I agree with you on on that one, the problem is I did nt have any bleach so my curiousity got the better of me and my god my ears where bleeding after listneing to him spew on and on about «well thats what I heard» every second.Its almost like he likes to listen to himself talk over and over like a broken record.Unfortunatley his information sounds as credible as a 10 year old watching sesame street and thinking Oscar the grouch is real.I do nt think we have anything to worry about other then a few little kinks you get at any launch of any game or console.

She and I agreed that, if anything, folks should be far more concerned about the tropics in a warming climate, given how many regions are close to physical limits for heat now and other factors, like fragmentation of rain forests and pollution impacts on reefs, are adding stress.

It's hard for me to give Murdoch credit for doing anything I agree with, so I'll wear 2 hats on this one: one of hope / wait - and - see, and two of expecting the blog to be nothing more than a «heat deflector», green spin, a token nod to being green while mostly working against green progress in other ways, even within the blog.

Legal malpractice may include things like making a decision or settling your case without your consent, spending your retainer on anything other than your legal case, or failing to take action or do what the attorney agreed to do for your case.

If anything, it's the other way around - with all this information available everywhere, we learn to quickly find what we need and agree on and sort out that which we don't.

Unfortunately, saving your marriage when you have opposite work schedules, live an hour away from each other and don't agree on anything, is going to be challenging beyond words!

That's right, it is a gamble when a client hires a real estate salesperson; the sales person has influenced the client to take a gamble on him / her, all without investing anything of substance other than agreeing to some terms to be met when and «if» a transaction takes place... without any negative spin - off problems taking place.

Couldn't agree more Mike.This system would be so easy to manipulate and would be by every no fee, flat fee, I don't don't do anything for you but let my other Realtor friends pay CREA to advertise your listing for me on realtor.ca (because that's all they do you know) dream system.