Do not
agree to a contract where the Seller has the right of specific performance, as the last thing you would ever want is the seller suing you to try to force you to buy a property that you don't want.
Not exact matches
A repo is a
contract between two counterparties
where one
agrees to sell a bond
to the other and repurchase it at a specified price at some date in the future.
Where being a Christian is a «contract» with Jesus, one where He pays for our sins if we agree to live for Him and not ourse
Where being a Christian is a «
contract» with Jesus, one
where He pays for our sins if we agree to live for Him and not ourse
where He pays for our sins if we
agree to live for Him and not ourselves.
After two years on loan at Roma, Szczesny must now return
to Arsenal,
where has still has another two years remaining on his
contract, so he would not be allowed
to talk
to Juventus, or any other club, until a transfer fee is
agreed with the Gunners.
There is of course huge doubts over the futures of Mesut Ozil and Alexis Sanchez, with both having failed
to agree extensions
to their own
contracts which also expire next summer, but should the pair stay, it seems hard
to figure out exactly
where Barkley would fit into our first - team plans.
Before Arsene sign the
contract he said «two or three new signings will win Arsenal the league», he signed two players,
agreed, look what he turn us
to and
where we are, when will this man face fact but he is so stubborn and arrogant
to admit the truth.
In order
to comprehensively say you know
where u will be playing next season means he has
agreed or signed a
contract.
AC Milan CEO Adriano Galliani is said
to have met with Sergi Berti, the representative of Romagnoli, on Saturday morning in Forte dei Marmi —
where personal terms and a preliminary
contract were allegedly
agreed upon.
A new goalkeeper is also an option, which is
where the interest in Thibaut Courtois comes in, and like Hazard — a new
contract has yet
to be
agreed, and his deal will have just 18 - months
to run from next month.
The 16 - year - old has already
agreed on a three - year
contract with the Old Trafford outfit and will travel
to Manchester this weekend
to complete his deal, which is
where an official announcement from the club will probably be made, pending formalities, of course.
A charitable gift annuity involves a simple
contract between you and Tufts Medical Center and Floating Hospital for Children
where you
agree to make a gift
to Tufts Medical Center and Floating Hospital for Children and we, in return,
agree to pay you (and someone else, if you choose) a fixed amount each year for the rest of your life.
In order
to play a coke addict in St Elmo's Fire (1985), she had
to sign a
contract agreeing to take treatment for her own drink problem and
to stopDemi Moore was born in Roswell, New Mexico,
where her father, Charles Harmon, had left her mother before Demi was born.
Green says, «certainly the unions could compromise and
agree to allowing Malloy and Pryor a dozen or 18 schools
where the state could take dramatic action — longer days, year - round school, more social services, better pay for sought - after science and math teachers — without the constraints of restrictive labor
contracts.»
Even in cases
where we
agreed to a royalty share
contract with the author or publisher, our promotional efforts would still pale compared
to those of the author.
My practice is
to download all
contracts, including the 30 - page
contracts where you are only shown a few lines in a window that has an «I
Agree» check box below it, and copy them
to a file
where I can read them in a better environment.
The inner - workings of cash value life insurance consists of a life insurance policy, which is a
contract between the policy owner, the insured (often the same person), and the insurer,
where the insurer
agrees to pay a death benefit
to the policy's beneficiary, based on the owner continuing
to make the policy's premium payments.
This standardization contrasts
to over-the-counter (OTC)
contracts where buyers and sellers
agree to the terms.
A
contract which requires a seller
to agree to deliver a specified cash commodity
to a buyer sometime in the future,
where the parties expect delivery
to occur.All terms of the
contract may be customized, in contrast
to futures
contracts whose terms are standardized.
It is a
contract where if you pay your
agreed upon premium, the insurance company in return
agrees to pay for any motorcycle - related losses that may occur as outlined in the policy.
You and a dealer enter into a
contract where you buy a car and also
agree to pay, over a period of time, the amount financed plus a finance charge.
An instalment sales
contract is
where you
agree to purchase property from the seller through a series of instalments.
A charitable gift annuity involves a simple
contract between you and Animal League America
where you
agree to make a gift
to Animal League America and we, in return,
agree to pay you (and someone else, if you choose) a fixed amount each year for the rest of your life.
This includes, for example, any additional services or facilities which your hotel or any other supplier
agrees to provide for you
where the services or facilities are not advertised in our brochure or on our website and we have not
agreed to arrange them as part of our
contract and any excursion you purchase during your holiday.
Except
where otherwise stated, these booking conditions only apply
to holiday arrangements which you book with us in the UK and which we
agree to make, provide or perform (as applicable) as part of our
contract with you.
A German court reached this decision
where the provisions of the 1996 English Arbitration Act
agreed to by the parties granted discretion
to the tribunal
to schedule an oral hearing.908 A United States court held that a tribunal's decision of an issue of
contract interpretation based solely on documentary evidence was not fundamentally unfair
where the parties had not
agreed on the applicable procedure.
In the Court's view, the decision
to consolidate the claims was within the tribunal's discretion, and this decision was reached after a careful interpretation of the parties»
contract.906 In another decision, a United States court held that there was no deviation from the rules of the American Arbitration Association
agreed to by the parties
where the tribunal had considered a belatedly submitted technical report, adding that «[a] rbitration proceedings are not constrained by formal rules of procedure or evidence.»
Non-compete agreements —
where employees
agree not
to compete with their employer for a period of time — have become common in employment
contracts.
The point
to be taken from the case, is that before
agreeing to the terms of a business relationship
where the
contract contains an arbitration clause, some attention should be paid
to it.
Imagine a situation
where one party shakes hands with the intention of actually hiring the other person, while the other person thinks the handshake is just an agreement
to send the actual
contract for review and possible acceptance - these people didn't
agree on the same thing, so the
contract is invalid.
The Court indicated that specific language
contracting out of common law notice requirements is not necessary
where the «intention
to displace an employee's common law notice rights can be readily gleaned from the language
agreed to by the parties.»
In Nagribianko v. Select Wine Merchants Ltd., the Ontario Court of Appeal examined the enforceability of probationary clauses and ultimately concluded that if parties
to an employment
contract agree to a probationary period, the right
to common law reasonable notice can be rebutted
where the employee is terminated during the probationary period.
Arbitration is a method of dispute resolution
where parties
to a
contract agree to settle disputes through adjudication by a private arbitrator or panel of arbitrators instead of in court.
for good reason, I think, because if eventually every service or product came with a
contract which prevented consumers from filing a lawsuit or class action if, say, for instance, the product or service caused injury or death, like a car with braking system flaws, or a child's toy that causes cancer, etc, then we'd live in a world
where corporations could shove whatever they wanted down our throats, cause injuries and death, and we could do nothing about it, because we «
agreed to a
contract» by using their product or service in the first place (and in this scenario there would be no alternatives, so you either risk using products that could kill you, or you go live in a cave or something).
The Supreme Court adopted the Court of Appeal's description of the position under standard
contract law (see Lord Clarke's judgment at para 20): ordinarily
where the terms are in writing and there are no oral terms then the written terms will, prima facie, represent the whole of the parties» agreement; the parties are bound by the written terms when they sign the
contract; the written terms will stand unless they do not accurately reflect what was
agreed because of a mistake (generally common
to the parties); and no terms which conflict with the express terms can be implied into the
contract.
Tennille v. Tennille, No. 99 - CV - 1001 & 00 - CV - 924 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, February 14, 2002): The ex-husband appealed from the entry of default judgment on a breach of
contract action
where he
agreed to pay his former wife a fixed percent of his income in lieu of alimony.
Generally, a settlement will take the form of negotiation, which is followed up by a written
contract where both sides forgo all further action (like a lawsuit), instead choosing
to resolve the situation through payment of an amount of money that they both
agree to.
•
where parties of member States have expressly
agreed to a court in their
contract, the court selected by parties must act in every case as long as the choice of court agreement is valid.
Where an employer decides unilaterally
to make substantial changes
to the essential terms of an employee's
contract of employment and the employee does not
agree to the changes and leaves his or her job, the employee has not resigned, but has been dismissed.
In principle, any
contract provision can be made «smart», essentially by being reduced
to an «IF / THEN» statement
where the input of specified data triggers an
agreed result, such as release of a payment.
In one shred of good news for a challenging bidder the Supreme Court, this time
agreeing with the Court of Appeal, found that a bidder should not be prevented from claiming damages
where it has commenced it claim in time but not taken steps
to invoke an automatic suspension
to prevent the
contracting authority from entering into the
contract.
Chief Justice McLachlin subsequently suggested that when people take the trouble
to put down their
contract in writing, what is contained in that document is exactly what they intended; especially
where the parties have
agreed to a four corners clause, the parties do not intend for it
to be modified by anything else.
In preparation for ratification, Ontario businesses should be aware of the Hague Convention's key features, including: •
where parties of member States have expressly
agreed to a court in their
contract, the court selected by parties must act in every case as long as the choice of court agreement is valid.
When you arrange a mortgage, it is a
contract between you and the lender,
where you
agree to pay back the principal and interest according
to a set schedule.
In cases
where contracting parties have expressly
agreed to a legally enforceable forum selection clause, the Delaware Supreme Court has held that courts must honor the parties»
contract and enforce the clause, even if, absent any forum selection clause, the first - filed rule might otherwise require a different result.
In the example above,
where a covered entity has a business associate
contract with a lawyer, and the lawyer discloses protected health information
to an expert witness in preparation for litigation, the lawyer again would have no responsibility under this subpart with respect
to uses or disclosures by the expert witness, because such witness is not undertaking the functions, activities or services that the business associate lawyer has
agreed to perform.
Exclusivity periods in property
contracts, eg
where a seller
agrees with a potential buyer not
to negotiate with anyone else for a specific time period) are unlikely
to be caught, unless the period appears excessive.
That article allows a member state
to restrict the scope of the Convention (a bit like the CISG)
to contracts where both parties are in member states, or when the parties have
agreed that the convention applies.
The best examples are provided by the developments within what I call «go - ing transaction adjustments», i.e., cases
where the parties
agree that the terms of the original
contract are
to be changed in the midst of performance, and cases on the third party beneficiary rule
where no consistent attempt was made
to fit the cases together in spite of the fact that there was, supposedly, a very clear rule.
«The Rules shall apply
where the parties
to a sales or service
contract concluded using electronic communications have, at the time of a transaction, explicitly
agreed that disputes relating
to that transaction and falling within the scope of the Rules shall be resolved under the Rules.»
The damage
to such a unique work of art, in circumstances
where a
contract for the sale of the item had been
agreed, throws up interesting legal issues of
contract law, in particular whether or not, as a result of the accident, the
contract had become discharged.