Sentences with phrase «agree with him on everything»

We may not agree with them on everything, but we do think there's a lot here others can learn from:

The reviewer explains that Neuhaus is very polemical and resists «dialogue» with those who do not agree with him on everything.

It's either agree with them on everything or you're not one of them.

As I agree with you on everything you say, we still need a DM.

I agree with you on everything you noted, but you are also missing one thing.

I completely agree with her on everything.

I don't necessarily agree with him on everything.

I just wanted to say I agree with you on everything in this post.

Well, I kind of disagree on this point, as I sometimes wear my gloves when it's super cold because I hate having my hands cold (and I always do have)... but besides that, I agree with you on everything!

Didn't agree with you on everything... thought Greta looked divine in her yellow dress.

one of my favorites... just because I love your blog, and maybe because I lived in Barcelona for 18 months and I completely agree with you on everything, I felt in love with that city, I'm still are..

I agree with you on everything except the peblum and the cape, it's something different and adds a little flair, although you are right the dresses would look great without as well!

Your significant other doesn't need to agree with you on everything, but he or she should support your choices and respect your opinions.

Even people who don't agree with me on everything and are somewhat of a skeptical bent should see some advantage in making common cause to get rid of the junk science arguments being made by a lot of the skeptics.

Don't insist that your child has to agree with you on everything.

Not exact matches

Once we agree on everything, we come up with a time frame and put it into practice.

«Donald had to agree to every term of every deal and had to sign off on everything,» Kriss, who worked with the real - estate company Bayrock before leaving because he was convinced it was a money - laundering front, told O'Brien last month.

If both sides, through their eyes and their people's eyes, have concluded that the plaintiff is absolutely going to win this case, and the plaintiff is going to get a lot of money because they're totally on board with everything that has been presented, then that might be a good reason for the defendant to agree to a settlement with the plaintiff for less money than the potential exposure if the jury comes back and finds willful infringement.

Some 62 percent of those surveyed said they did not want to make a decision now on donating organs; one - third of respondants said they don't want to deal with topics related to death; and another third said they are worried that if they agree to donate, and then become critically ill, doctors won't do everything they can to save them.

Even if the government ran a balanced budget or a budget surplus, the Fed would still be able to inflate the money supply (therefore, Mr. Hussman, with whom we agree on nearly everything else in his highly readable weekly comments, is in error on this particular point).

While I do not agree with everything she says or does she's a fellow American and has the religious right on this one.

Which is why DeMoss was in front of the North Carolina delegation at the convention Monday morning, arguing that it's unfair for some Republicans to insist on a presidential nominee with whom they agree about everything.

Not that I fully agree with everything the church does nor condone the actions of those priests, but seriously do you have anything better to do than to spew hate on a comment board?

I agree that the new testament offers some good guidelines on how to live your life (loving your neighbor, etc., etc.) but everything should be taken with a grain of salt.

«I agree with them on almost everything: their political and social causes, and the ACLU, God knows, the right to freedom of speech, to help the homeless, the poor, the minorities.»

Despite his confession of sympathy to shared causes, he does not actually «agree with [the liberals] on almost everything.»

I think I'm too simple in my thinking that; if you don't like it, DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see...

As expected, I don't agree with everything he says, but then, as you and I are finding, none of us agree on everything, and sometimes, we even disagree with ourselves over time....

I do not agree with EVERYTHING David says (however, I can't remember what I don't agree with right now) but as a member of a Mainline Protestant church, his cartoons, are right on MOST of the time.

I can agree with someone or a doctrine on one thing, but that doesn't mean we need to agree on everything else.

I was incredibly vulnerable and if I had noticed ANYTHING out of the ordinary that was a «sign» I probably would have seized it and then who knows, I might be on this blog agreeing with everything you're saying (to some extent at least, as I grew up Jewish, so I think we'd still be at odds, just slightly less so).

I do not agree with the catholic teachings so I don't go to their church.I went to a church for many years and when they went a different way than what I believe I stopped going to it.I didn't try to change them.Government and a church will never agree on everything and its not the church job to change government and the government should not change a church beliefs.If you are a member of a church and do not agree with them anymore you should leave that church.

As with the two - volume work, although I agree with nearly everything Greg writes in the book, I once again found myself disagreeing with the central idea... that God withdraws from Jesus on the cross, and therefore, in the violent portions of the OT, God is withdrawing Himself from the people and nations who experience / suffer violence.

But I will never forget how she concluded her talk by saying something like this: «You may disagree with everything I have said thus far, but I hope we can at least agree on this,» she said.

Agree with Human Species on everything, including the GO GATORS part (class of 77!!)

Many people seem to want a president with whom they'll agree on everything and if that's your standard I would suggest you run yourself next time.

This is an extreme example, but I believe you don't have to agree with your pastors on everything.

Also, I am pro life so I don't agree with the Green Party when it comes to that issue, although I do agree with them on pretty everything else.

Much of the material was helpful, though I did not agree with everything, especially his sections on miracles and spiritual gifts.

I figured that while I wouldn't agree with the AIG folks» perspective on everything, I wouldn't see anything that would surprise me.

You seem to be talking only to those who already agree with everything you state, and that seems fairly pointless to me (and I would assume, most people on this board).

Perhaps the internet is doing all of the above and more: encouraging and unifying small religious and other movements; further facilitating scientific unification across geographic proximity, if not also creating new scientific theories and concepts; fostering the rise of new forms of spiritual irrationalism such as those discussed in Wendy Kaminer's wild book, Sleeping with Extra-Terrestrials; focusing the public even more on particular public personas in news, sports and everything else; creating new classes of investors who are willing to publish online just about anything, regardless of whether or not they agree with it; germinating new technological ideas that are luring capitalists who hold unreasonable expectations of financial bonanzas.

I'm ok with disagreement, if we all agreed on everything, how could we learn?

I don't see christian churches teaching people to stone anyone anymore, just to legislate against them (stomping on the first ammendment in the process) in hopes that they can ignore the reality of others not agreeing with everything they say, or not behaving in what they view as the right way.

All atheists agree with one another on everything even if it has nothing to do with atheism.

In fact, as I began my journey out of the institutional church I was questioning everything from both sides and the responses I got from the blogger you mention were downright rude and I haven't commented on his blog since (unless I totally agreed with him and could» t resist).

I agree with you wholeheartedly that God has provided everything to mankind in grace, we just have to respond in faith that Jesus offers eternal to all who believe in Him for it, based on who He is and His substitionary death for us.

Without God, we are torn in two directions: universities praise diversity, but students still form cliques; politicians promise a bright future, but all our news programs are distressing; people are obsessed with scientific explanations of everything, and equally obsessed with sentimental love in every pop song; sexual abuse with a minor is the most shameful of all crimes, but everyone has a right to complete sexual liberation once they reach the age of consent; we relocate all over the world, preferring to live anywhere but home, yet we still agonize over our local sports team; we own many things, and still feel like we don't have enough; we believe in discipline at school or at work, but we all have a right to «let ourselves go» on the weekend; we tolerate everything, except people that don't agree with us.

I don't agree with everything the foundation supports (I don't think everyone does well on grains and dairy no matter how fermented, sprouted, etc..)

I agree with the reviewer from Baltimore: If you're lazy toss everything in a slow cooker and blast it on high for 8 - 10 hours.