Current models
agree with observations only if certain parameters take particular values — if the forces holding matter together were stronger or weaker, for instance, the universe would not look the way it does.
Current multiverse models
agree with observations only if certain parameters are given specific values — if the forces holding matter together were slightly stronger or weaker, for instance, it would be impossible for us to be here to observe the universe.
Not exact matches
To many, who go so far as to
agree with the
observation that religion finds itself in a state of crisis (and there are, indeed, many who will not even admit the justice of such an
observation) a new theological movement, which has attracted the attention of the whole Christian world, appears to be the
only savior.
Whitehead's theory not
only agrees with Einstein's and
with observations in these crucial cases, it is also a mathematically simpler theory.
Minus some flashes from both Sead and Iwobi, and a workingman - like effort from Elneny, we learned very little... so here are a few of my
observations from today's game, which highlight my concerns about this team moving forward... the fact that Mertz started this game, regardless of our injuries or those being «rested», should be a serious red flag for any true Arsenal fan... if Wenger is preparing to use Mertz
with any regularity then the whole thing is a moot point because we are in deep shit... the fact is no quality team would ever have this tin soldier anywhere near there starting eleven except to groom their youthful players, who in turn should be playing in this type of game instead... I can
only hope he was simply throwing him a bone for the FA appearance and for
agreeing to stay on following the season, but I think the most likely answer is that Wenger's fragile relationship
with the fan - base can't be ignored so he felt his experience was a safer bet... unfortunately not a positive choice for a team trying to move forward (same old, same old)
It's nice to know that Eric Pickles not
only reads ConHome but apparently
agrees with my
observation!
Therefore, it is intriguing that arguments persist that because
only small accelerations are presently evident, the IPCC sea level projections must be wrong, when in fact the
observations over the last 20 years
agree closely
with the Third Assessment Report and AR4 projections and are statistically consistently
with AR5 RCP8.5 projections.
As for the models
agreeing with observations — that's
only because they tweaked the previous models that didn't
agree so well, which gives no weight to the idea that the models are any good.
(b) The derived distribution is a power law
only asymptotically (on the tail) and this
agrees with observations.
Playing
with the starting value
only determines whether the models and
observations will appear to
agree best in the early, middle or late portion of the graph.