Not exact matches
A Hasidic Jew presents problems to any
organization since they are bound by a higher set of
religious dogma that might not
agree with established governmental policies.
Anyway, it sounds like we
agree — if an
organization believes (rightly or wrongly) that a person's
religious views, or lack thereof, conflict
with their objectives, they should be able to fire them.
What's far more surprising is the number of
religious individuals and
organizations who are on record as
agreeing with him, either equating religions and cults or insisting on the blurriness of any line that might separate them.
Since we have
agreed that I accept (at least provisionally, as far as the powerfully augmented eye can see) an expanding Universe and am therefore clearly
religious about physics and mathematics and reason if nothing else, can you explain to me how God isn't something and yet is capable of things like sentience, action, choice, design, starting off Big Bangs out of nothingness — all things that seem to involve a remarkably high degree of material complexity and
organization (not to mention time, and space and energy)-- not to mention various Amazing Powers to make an entire Universe poof into existence out of nowhere
with just the right rules to work out to become (in very small part) me some 14 billion years later.
The Divisional Court did not
agree with the Tribunal's approach to the interpretation of the second requirement in s. 24 (1)(a)-- namely, that Christian Horizons demonstrate that it is a «
religious...
organization that is primarily engaged in serving the interests of persons identified by their... creed, or gives preference in employment to, persons similarly identified».