Sentences with phrase «agree with the observations»

Everybody would agree with this observation.

In general I'd agree with the observation that this is a movement against organizations not religions.

To many, who go so far as to agree with the observation that religion finds itself in a state of crisis (and there are, indeed, many who will not even admit the justice of such an observation) a new theological movement, which has attracted the attention of the whole Christian world, appears to be the only savior.

I agree with your observation that some things never change.

I've read that whole - wheat flour absorbs more water than white, and this agrees with my observations.

Major was happy to agree with that observation, although he laughed and said, «Ahhh, maybe I wasn't good enough.»

I, unlike the majority on this board completely agree with your observations on Theo and the necessity for Arsenal to aggressively reshape there squad this summer.

And in speaking about moms I know who do use Babywise, I wholeheartedly agree with her observation.

I completely agree with your observation about how baby was cuddled up in your warm, soft, heart - beating tummy for so long, why on earth do we expect babies to sleep on a cold, firm, lifeless, solitary crib just days after they are born?

At least going by the last lyrical bridge of Cooke's song quoted in part in Part 3, we have Bob Marley essentially agreeing with this observation on the track «Ambush in the Night» (with our emphasis):

It's nice to know that Eric Pickles not only reads ConHome but apparently agrees with my observation!

Current multiverse models agree with observations only if certain parameters are given specific values — if the forces holding matter together were slightly stronger or weaker, for instance, it would be impossible for us to be here to observe the universe.

Particularly as an ensemble, they reflect reality quite well: «On the whole, the simulated trends agree with the observations,» says Jochem Marotzke.

We must take this restriction into account if we want the results of our simulations to agree with observations.»

Current models agree with observations only if certain parameters take particular values — if the forces holding matter together were stronger or weaker, for instance, the universe would not look the way it does.

«There are models that predict that [nickel - 48] has such a short lifetime that we should not have been able to see it, and other models agree with our observations because they predict that it lives at least a few microseconds.»

The simulations agree with observations of the cyclic behavior of ELMs in tokamaks around the world.

We agree with this observation, and generally view refined grains as an unwanted routine component of any diet.

I think I agree with the observation.

I agree with your observation about the white jacket, but I don't mind the trousers to be the second surprise.

The folks at RiverNorth, who use a different CEF arbitrage strategy in RiverNorth Core Opportunities (RNCOX), agree with that observation.

I agree with your observations in the USA — it sure seems silly in this day and age of competition to NOT have any no - fee banking choices available to us!

I strongly agree with the observations in the article that assessing whether lending has been hurt by additional regulations or not is very difficult to measure.

Hugh, I completely agree with your observation in question # 2.

I agree with your observation of the weight impulse appears to play, but I can not help but consider that his impulse coincides with system (ie plotting).

This agrees with all observations but the observations are either not global or not accurate enough to be conclusive.

Webby, if the generally accepted theory doesn't agree with observations, it's falsified.

I absolutely agree with your observation about the shift in influence, Dr. Curry.

I think that you are going a roundabout way to agree with my observation that the models are incomplete.

with respect to «It is seen from the figure with both natural and human forcing that climate models simulations agree with observations very well during the period 1970 - 2000.»

The natural process involved agrees with all observations (no known natural process does that job).

Even in the warmest scenario, fewer than 5 % of model simulations of the long - term, 80 - year trend agree with observations by 2020 and fewer than 2.5 % agree by 2030.

This region required a heat flow of at least 150 - 180 milliwatts per square meter to agree with the observations.

And that «theory» does agree with all observations.

Does anyone publishes anything about how well calculated DLR agrees with observation on a cloudy night in the tropics?

Overlap with water vapor is important for radiation from clear skies, but shouldn't all models should get relative humidity correct and agree with observations from space?

All AOGCMs presumably are tuned so that the global climatology of OLR and OSR agree with observations.

These both give a product of 0.15 C per decade to agree with observations, but with different forcings due to uncertainty.

At this point we say: «it is significant, we have a theoretical estimate and it agrees with observations.»

As for the models agreeing with observations — that's only because they tweaked the previous models that didn't agree so well, which gives no weight to the idea that the models are any good.

If these initial tests have been passed, you can start formulating your theory based on this proposition and see how the results yielded by the theory agree with observations and if they are not in conflict with the laws of physics.

If it doesn't agree with observations it's wrong.»

Researchers from the Alfred Wegener Institute's Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, the University of Bremen, Germany, and the University of Cardiff in the UK, report in Nature journal that they have made climate simulations that agree with observations of historical climate change that date back 800,000 years.

(b) The derived distribution is a power law only asymptotically (on the tail) and this agrees with observations.

The Russians (one of their academys of science) have devised a climate model that agrees with observations.

If you are going to pick one to defend perhaps it would be wise to shut your eyes and pick the one that most closely agrees with observations.

By warming the upper ocean (agrees with observations) and reducing low cloud cover (unclear from observations: ISCCP data are routinely over - interpreted / downright misrepresented on this point).

On the global warming issue posted by Justin, I can't say that I agree with his observation.

In fact, despite a certain warming trend is reproduced in the model, which appears to agree with the observations, the model simulation clearly fail in reproducing the cyclical dynamics of the climate that presents an evident quasi 60 - year cycle with peaks around 1880, 1940 and 2000.

The physics underlying the basics of climate science are utterly uncontroversial, over a century old and broadly agree with observations.