Sentences with phrase «agree with the readers»

I agree with another reader that they were very oily too.

I agree with the readers and think it was a mistake to go ahead with the Danone sponsorship because the subject of the debate could be interpreted as being too close to the subject of the controversy that has surrounded the company.

In one of them, Assini agreed with a reader who used the term «sexual deviants» and in another he quoted a pastor who called transgender people «mentally disturbed.»

I agree with reader Sadie Williams that «whether I am obeying laws of probability or causality, or both, I am still not free» (31 August, p 31).

I agree with reader Sadie Williams that «whether I am obeying laws of probability or causality, or both, I am...

Do you agree with the readers who loved it?

And I do agree with another reader here that she can go kick - ass action flicks just as well as dramas.

Look at the text carefully and see if you agree with the reader.

I also agree with Reader's post.

I'm not quite sure what that has to do with airline alliances, but Chris agrees with the reader that he's not being unreasonable in expecting US Airways and / or Royal Jordanian to either reroute him or compensate him for his hotel expenses.

I agree with your readers, you deserve to be rewarded financially for countless hours this stuff takes.

You did an amazing job capturing them, and I have to agree with your readers these would make lovely note cards.

Not exact matches

Even as they dissented, several readers admitted that having to charge a phone every day is starting to get old and agreed with at least some of my points.

Some you might not wholly agree with, others might just make you chuckle, but the fun post is sure to provide at least a few useful lessons to every reader.

«Author Julie Morgenstern wrote an entire book on the subject, called Never Check Email in the Morning,» The Huffington Post reminds readers in an article that rounds up several voices all agreeing with Morgenstern and Bradberry.

It is not to say that these energy executives will agree with every policy the Alberta government will implement over the next three years, but these two Postmedia business columnists owe it to their readers not to omit these important facts from their columns.

It is assumed and agreed upon by readers that they will consult with their own licensed / registered financial advisors before making investment decisions.

Bible citations (or Shakespearean citations) presume that your reader has read and agrees with the phrase cited.

hen discussing the possible existence of objective (divine) «truths», people like truthfollower / Theo appeal to their audience with various examples attempting to get the reader to agree to a non-qualifed value of «evil / incorrect / bad / good», as if this will lock in an agreement of an objective «truth» value (without it being explicitly specified).

I agree with all the positive things Travis LaCouter said yesterday about Adam Greene's Bibliotheca Kickstarter campaign, an effort to present a reader's edition of the Bible, stripped of all verse numbers and other annotations and bound in four handsome volumes, one for the Law, one for the Prophets, one for the Writings, and one for the New Testament.

You are certainly welcome to your opinion, but there are millions of readers who don't agree with you.

When discussing the possible existence of objective (divine) «truths», truthfollower over and over appeals to his audience with various examples attempting to get the reader to agree to a non-qualifed value of «evil / incorrect / bad / good», as if this will lock in an agreement of an objective «truth» value (without it being explicitly specified).

By leaving out this important information and by failing to seriously explore those biblical passages that, at least at first glance, don't seem to support his thesis, Bell has left his readers ill - equipped to deal with challenges from those who don't agree with these ideas.

anyone who is in the lobby industry or marketing research knows about this business but the majority of the average forum readers have no clue that the person they are talking with is in character and secretly copying their info and telling some lobby if they agree or disagree with their agenda.

Many readers who agree that the U.S. was intended to be a republic and not an empire will nonetheless disagree with what can only be described as the author's radical isolationism, including his restated doubts as to whether World War II was ours to fight and his suggestion that Israel is, at least in the long term, a lost cause.

It is inevitable that I shall make some statements with which not all readers will agree.

If the reader does not agree with the estimates given, he may make his own estimates and then carry them through to their logical conclusions.

There may be things some readers won't agree with but there is much deep Christian exposition that will help our search and walk.

All readers will benefit from Lombardo's broad learning, multidisciplinary approach, and clear reasoning, but not all will agree with him on every count.

Probably not all readers will agree with what the author writes in this chapter, for the whole matter of Christian perfection is very much disputed.

If we may imagine a group of readers, from many different cultures and with various intellectual presuppositions, coming fresh to the New Testament, we shall expect them to respond to that literature in many different ways and to reach various conclusions as to its meaning and worth; but on one thing I believe it is fair to expect them to agree: «Here,» they would say, «is reflected a new and distinctive communal life.

Many U.S. Catholic readers will be tempted to agree with Blackburn when he says.

Readers who like to associate design with repeated acts of special creation, including many supporters of the Intelligent Design movement, will likely agree with this conclusion while rejecting Gingerich's overall attitude toward natural theology.

Is it your position that it should only be for readers who AGREE with the post?

I love this when my readers suggest a better version and I agree with them and we collaboratively create a better cartoon!

Now the editors of Commonweal have answered that the comments were, in fact, awful calumny, but that they were left by blog readers, not contributors, and nobody over at Commonweal agrees with them, much less hates First Things.

In this zone not all readers will agree with my picture of the seminary professors as safe and settled.

Readers may agree or disagree with such presentations of the teaching and also with the teaching's application to what they understand to be the facts of a particular conflict.

It is great to read through all the comments and see so many I agree 100 % with — longtime reader of your blog but have never commented, happy to see your familiar kitchen counter figure prominently on the covers of your book... all my most popular recipes come from your blog, they're the perfect combo of being easy to make and yet still sophisticated and wonderful.

I DEFINITELY agree with the other reader who suggested Pierre Hermé, it is an absolute must!

I agree with the other readers that the end product was lackluster.

(I agree with several other readers — «slightly boozy» is a bit of an understatement.)

I agree with the other readers — sub at your own risk.

I am personally sick of readers abusing any opinions that don't agree with their own.

Budd, yesterday you told me I was wrong for banning a reader who just threw (in your words above) «insults at anyone not agreeing with their ideas.»

Well let's NOT Google «Arsenal fan polls» as opinions change over time, so let us have a reflection of what us Gooners think right now, without any games to distract us, and see if we can get a FACTUAL figure on the actual percentage of JustArsenal readers who agree or disagree with Jon.

As is the case every week though, Crooks was roundly slammed by readers, as seen in the tweets below, as evidently they didn't agree with his picks.

It would be nice to hear you chime in to defend some of your readers who don't always agree with you.

I don't always agree with Dr. Amy's tone or tactics, but by linking to original posts she gives her readers the opportunity to go to the source.

In connection with the release of From Picky to Powerful, Maryanne agreed to answer Lunch Tray readers» toughest questions on handling this issue.