Sentences with phrase «agree with you on anything»

I never thought I would agree with you on anything.

Well, if you mean Jaan the Bollywood actress I would have to agree with her on anything she said.

She is needy, crazy and sometimes it is hard to agree with her on anything.

Not exact matches

A settlement means that we're going to not chance it to the jury to make a decision, we agree to disagree on whether anyone did anything wrong but we're making a practical business decision, we're going to pay this much to be done with this case and not test the waters.

And while politicians of all flavours are unable to agree on anything that will benefit Australia as a whole, Australians are voting with their feet.

Social blogging can be a great way to scale a small company because the mediums are often free (it doesn't cost you anything to sign up for Facebook, Twitter, tumblr, etc.) and experts agree that most companies will get a solid return on investment from the time they spend interacting with customers online.

One thing most small - business owners agree on is that they hate anything to do with taxes.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, if Thing Daemon believes in its discretion that your sale or any products, services, content or other materials in the listing or on Thing Daemon's servers may create liability for Thing Daemon or harm other users of the Services, then you agree that Thing Daemon may take any actions with respect to the content or materials or listing that Thing Daemon believes are prudent or necessary to minimize or eliminate our potential liability or to protect other users of our Services.

Sure, you may not be selling anything right at the moment, but you are selling the prospect on why they should trust you and why they should agree to an appointment setting with you.

Can you see why equality under the law and equal rights for everyone means throwing out the bias of religion, as none of them agree with the others on anything.

Not that I fully agree with everything the church does nor condone the actions of those priests, but seriously do you have anything better to do than to spew hate on a comment board?

You don't see it because you've made up your mind on the issue, and refuse to see or hear anything else, and then you expect everyone to completely agree with you.

Since Jesus is the main revelation of God in this view (which I agree with), they sometimes then go on to say that anything in the Old Testament which doesn't look like Jesus is therefore an error.

I was incredibly vulnerable and if I had noticed ANYTHING out of the ordinary that was a «sign» I probably would have seized it and then who knows, I might be on this blog agreeing with everything you're saying (to some extent at least, as I grew up Jewish, so I think we'd still be at odds, just slightly less so).

I don't think I've ever read anything I agree with more on these boards.

This abstract thinking applies at many levels — I am not singling out faith - based aspects, but I find myself agreeing with Nye that building a person up from a young age based on non-fact-based anything is a bad idea.

I agree you can't build anything with a wrecking ball, but neither can you build anything on a ruins.

Most people generally agree that singleness isn't exactly a curse or anything, but when you are single, it can be a little hard to get on board with the whole «singleness is a gift!»

but i didn't state anything example — i stated that the theory of evolution is yet to be proved and so with that i agree that due to that lacking it is equal to the theory of god... the only thing i said which is cemented truth for anything is that we don't know what the real answer is... and by stating ideas as facts serves no real purpose but a selfish one... lets call it an ease - ment on the inner self, the mind can now be at peace with the hope that when i die i get to live yet again... full belief in this is insane without evidence.

(i) the question of gay rights — funny I agree with gay rights, must be a political debate at its heart (ii) a wonan's right to choose — funny I agree with this, see above thought (iii) teaching evolution in school — again I agree (iv) my ability to buy a glass of wine on Sunday — definitely politics here (v) immunizing teens against HPV — got my kids immunized, not even politics here (vi) population control — this is religions fault??? no this is cultural (vii) assisted suicide at end of life — agree with that, still have my religion (viii) global warmning — agree it needs to get fixed, doesn't have anything to do with religion

I figured that while I wouldn't agree with the AIG folks» perspective on everything, I wouldn't see anything that would surprise me.

I do not see that the person wants to discuss anything, but instead wants to show how they are right based on God, religion, the Bible or whatever, whereas everyone who does not agree with their opinion is wrong.

I guess on that we'll have to agree to disagree, I find it annoying and dumb to mass post a dumb video that gets taken down soon after when it has nothing to do with the topic at hand and the person posting doesn't have anything whatsoever to contribute.

Perhaps the internet is doing all of the above and more: encouraging and unifying small religious and other movements; further facilitating scientific unification across geographic proximity, if not also creating new scientific theories and concepts; fostering the rise of new forms of spiritual irrationalism such as those discussed in Wendy Kaminer's wild book, Sleeping with Extra-Terrestrials; focusing the public even more on particular public personas in news, sports and everything else; creating new classes of investors who are willing to publish online just about anything, regardless of whether or not they agree with it; germinating new technological ideas that are luring capitalists who hold unreasonable expectations of financial bonanzas.

I've seen some comments about how ignorant Kelly is for bringing up this subject and I think too many of you are the ignorant ones who can't stand to see anything on Fox news that you don't agree with.

Yes, Jesus a Liberal... and Ken you are a frightened human being... let it go... I'm not pushing anything on anyone... Christ loves everyone... man was made in God's image so deal with it... and me2 you and I both know it was the conservatives who wanted slavery... Abe Lincoln would be sickened by what has happened to his party... he was a man who stood on principle and believed in good for the common man... way different than the party you are tied to... Price... I agree with you in that there are many good Christians... unfortunately, there are many who are very ignorant and use Christ / God as a convenient excuse to denounce what they don't accept...

Like the post above I agree totally with, a lot of ministries are putting shackles and chains on people making them OBLIGATED to leaderships demands and taking away the freedom that people have to choose to participate or anything.

In a family with three boys, trying to get them all to agree on anything is always a challenge.

These look great but banana doesn't agree with me: (Any ideas on what I could use instead if anything?

We all know that Wenger doesn't like agreeing with the fans on anything even if the whole world is saying the same thing as the fans.

All I am trying to do is give an opinion and hear some positive feedback on if other people agree / disagree with anything i said.

I totally agree with you theres no way on gods clean earth that we are going to win anything with the current strike force.

The world is watching how u go over the rope and react to certain remarks made by a certain group of folks on ere (especially if u don't agree with anything Wenger related)....

I agree the change was needed but it's not like Torchetti had anything to work with for his D man on each unit.

Arsenal are recovering and slowly getting back some confidence and fluidity in their game, played 120 mins on sunday and needed to rotate various players who were obviously not fully recovered and who were certain» red flags» for muscular injuries if theyd started (ie, ox, ramsey, holding) Leicester did not deserve anything at all, they were ultra defensive, yes worked hard I agree but its easier to defend with 9 behind the ball for vast periods of the game.

Your» e always on here shouting to the rafters about Wenger out and putting down people that don't agree with your brand of idiocy but you don't have anything worthwhile to say other than to berate people who don't want to think like you.

he hasn't agreed anything with Utd and I also heard that Utd are refusing to print shirts with his name on the back.?

Totally agree with you, Ozil perhaps followed be Cech some way down, although I have to say from a very poor team this year — not because they didn't win anything but because they lacked passion and commitment throughout and did nothing to light up the fans or offset the misery and frustration piled on the fans week after week.

I agree with you please not taken anything away form Ozil who kept putting it on a plate but Giroud showed the other side of him in just bringing down headers in dangerous places..

Ks - Gunner totally agree with you, we will always be short on winning anything major, it's a business plan they have at Arsenal and not a trophy wining one

Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey - Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility

I agree with you that AW has done some astounding things for the club, but he has also made some reall balls ups and week in week out it seems he is not able to offer up a tactical plan B or utilise key players in key positions against the relevant sides we play, (not starting with Rosicky and Walcott on Saturday was one such instance) I realise that no team wins all their games and I know that we have been under the cosh for quiet a few years now, but what annoys me more than anything else is the lack of Visible ambition, we spent three weeks messing around with Beliek and only just managed to get Paulista who was an uncertainty due to a work visa.

Well I am an Arsenal supporter, and even if I don't necessarily agree with Wenger's politics, I think people tend to forget about the fact that we support Arsenal the club, and should stick with our players and cheer them on, they are the ones playing, winning and losing, and us giving them a hard time doesn't help anything but to bring their confidence down.

«If I agreed with Harbour on anything it was unintentional,» Bull Cyclone later wrote.

Who said I care if anyone agrees with me.If you think anything I've said is not true then kindly point it out instead of saying its nonsense.I'm not forcing you or anyone to accept what I'm saying.I'm also expressing my views on the topic.Do you think everything here you've said has made sense?

Any top gambler will tell you that you should never bet on a «friendly» football match as absolutely anything could happen, but one thing you can be sure of tomorrow is that Arsenal v Chelsea will be anything but friendly, and Arsene Wenger agrees with that!

climb back in your hole lockay its boring cant think of anything more original than to slate other fans as delusional,,, so tired of this little clan on here and your opinions that have to be agreed with,,, beating man city was something to be happy about,, fact,, the amount of fans on here saying we can never beat the big teams when we do then were delusional for being pleased,, weird

However do agree with Stan on one thing, there are better ways to earn Mooney then football, Stan can now sell his shares and walk away with 1.5 billion or more GBP he can generate 10 % return on that money which is around 150 million GBP while his not earning anything now only the Value of the club is going up and i fear that what with the new prices and salaries of football players i can see a decline starting in a few years, so is he good for us in the future?

In a statement that punters who enjoy the markets online betting NZ offers as well as those around the rest of the world no doubt fully agree with, Hazard has said that Zidane epitomises football to a large degree and that he seemed capable of anything when he was on the pitch.

We were a classic case of opposites attracting, but with the baby, we just couldn't seem to agree on anything.