The plan may require regular meetings of the project team or regular reporting on progress against
agreed action points and on costs.
Not exact matches
The best we can do is to remember the mystery that God chooses to call * us * to be the hands and feet of Jesus Christ (a person whom Kerry neglects to mention in her heartfelt, but incomplete, accounting of the role of the Christian chaplain), and our job is to
point the way to him; but this, and I think Kerry would
agree, is best done through our loving
actions and not, as the professor or «Nancy» above might suggest, through our fancy words, theology, or persuasion.
I can understand making the
point that the people of Ferguson should be invited to forgive what they perceived as a wrong on the part of the officer...... but for you to make the assumption and then state that the Officer's
action was «wrong» (if that is what you meant to say) is not something I can
agree with, not without your full rationale (which maybe I missed from an earlier post)....
From a philosoplical
point of view, I completely
agree that we should judge by
actions not race.
I
agree to a
point if the respect is mutual, in Mike deans case it doesn't ring true that man treats footballers and possibly any being he crosses like children, he arrogantly flashes cards with barely any eye contact and refuses to explain his
actions for example Petr Cech last week..
His final chance to
agree before shareholders to accept Baby Milk
Action's four -
point plan for saving infant lives and ultimately ending the boycott.
I
agree with the
point which you acknowledge that there could be a danger of frustration and disempowerment getting in the way of working out what civic
actions could help or maximise the chances of an effective global deal.
We have consistently
agreed that there is a certain
point at which freedom of choice means allowing people to choose stupid
actions.
The Summit
agreed a ten -
point action plan, demanding that Councils and other landlords do not evict tenants due to benefit cuts, with plans for direct
action, lobbying and mass protests to resist evictions and bailiffs.
«Operatives attached to Special Anti-Robbery Squad promptly swung into
action accompany the complainant to the
agreed point where money Will be dropped at Omadeni village in Dekina Local Government of Kogi State, and laid siege on the suspects.
While the committee said there was insufficient evidence to conclude that the relationship at any
point constituted «quid pro quo sexual harassment,» it unanimously
agreed Wozniak's subsequent
actions and those of her attorney amounted to retaliation against Farah (who was not named in the report).
Participants
agreed on a statement
pointing out the disruption caused by fossil fuel use and calling for cooperative, collective
action to curb greenhouse gas emissions.
I
agree that this is a good course of
action to take at this
point.
Soon the price
action, or at some
point the price
action takes over and you want to buy three houses and five houses and you want to buy with nothing down and you want to
agree to payments that you can't make and all of that sort of thing because it doesn't make any difference, it's going to be worth more next year.
By accepting
points or rewards, or by accepting or using an RBC Bank credit card account, you
agree to indemnify each of RBC Bank, Kobie Marketing, other program partners, and each of their respective officers, directors, employees, agents, affiliates and successors for any and all claims, damages, expenses, losses and causes of
action (including attorney fees and court costs) incurred or suffered by any of the foregoing persons or entities and arising out of or relating to your breach of any provision of these Program rules, or any materials (regardless of form) that are provided by you.
and in the process box you in to a pre-drawn path; The Walking Dead provides you with a bunch of characters that will meet each other throughout the progression of the storyline and at one
point or another; you will ultimately decide their fate as to if they remain alive ahead of another character or if you abandon that character for not
agreeing with their opinions and
actions to protect the rest of the group and it is in that sense that you are effectively taking that freedom of choice and writing the story as you progress through each scenario and episode.
oit is with indignation that we are speaking othis document is not acceptable • Bolivia owe have learned about this document through the media, not through you onow we are given 60 minutes to accept something already
agreed upon by other states owe are seeing
actions in a dictatorial way othis is unacceptable and anti-democratic owe say to the people of the world: they shall judge upon it othe rights of our people are not being respected owe are not going to decide about so many lives in only 60 minutes othis is s group of a small number of countries oAPPLAUS • Cuba o4 hours ago Obama announced an agreement which is non-existant owe is behaving like an emperor owe have seen version being discussed by secretive groups in the last hours and days oCuba will not accept your draft declaration oat this conference, there is no consensus on this document oI associate my voice to Tuvalu, Venezuela, Bolivia othe target of 2 degrees is unacceptable o... • Costa Rica ofor the reasons that we have heard, this document can not be considered the work of the AWG - LCA and can not be considered by the COP othis can only be an INF doc, it's just for information oadditional question: in an earlier version, a CP.15 - decision, para. 1: there was a reference to a legally binding instrument to be adopted by the COP onow: we have a new version, but the reference to legally binding instrument disappeared • USA o [wants to speak, but
point of order by Nicaragua] • Nicaragua othere is already a precedent where we have not been given the right to speech onow that you have mentioned we finally want to speak • Pres. [moving on] oUS does not appear on my list any more, so next one is Sudan • Sudan othere must be something horribly wrong here oI pushed the button when I saw Nicaragua raising their sign in order to support them • Nicaragua othis is a deterioration of the democratic system oand this happens at the most important conference of the UN for many years owe have draft decisions about how to carry forward the process ostates (lists names) have written a submission: • this has not followed the basic principles of the UN • inclusion • bottom up processes • democratic participation • equality of states oduring this consequence, many states expressed their position against such approaches othe only agreement we recognize is??
Brad Johnson, who writes the Wonk Room blog for the Center for American Progress
Action Fund, challenged me to clarify my stance on things,
pointing to a post by his colleague Joe Romm concluding that «human civilization is on the precipice» and asking if I
agreed.
But it does suggest that if both sides of the debate paid close attention to the social consequences of policies, rather than the present intractable debate on the reality of AGW, then we might get to a
point where we can
agree on some
action — you might think it is pointless with regard to the climate (but a substantial proportion of people think it will), but if it produces some other good outcomes it might be ok.
But it does suggest that if both sides of the debate paid close attention to the social consequences of policies, rather than the present intractable debate on the reality of AGW, then we might get to a
point where we can
agree on some
action — you might think it is pointless with regard to the climate (but a substantial proportion of people think it will), but if it produces some other good outcomes it might be OK.
With reference to your
point A), I think you will find that the POTUS would not
agree with you, and that is why he is calling for
action NOW, before the meeting in Paris.
«We may not all
agree on specific
action points, but we are united in a common goal of responsible environmental stewardship.»
A frequently used talking
point from Prime Minister Stephen Harper is that Canada will only tackle the issue of climate change if countries like China
agree to take
action as well.
The
point is,
agreeing on what to do is much harder than opposing any
action whatsoever.
During a press briefing today, Ambassador Yu Qingtai, China's Special Representative on Climate Change Negotiations from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, reiterated China's stance on the MRV issue,
pointing back to the Bali
Action Plan and stressing that China will not
agree to anything beyond the Bali
Action Plan.
Furthermore world leaders have
agreed that
action should be taken, at some unspecified
point in the future preferably when someone else is in charge.
I
agree with that but can not resist
pointing out that it represents a failed prediction by the «consumption is bad and we should all return to nature» lot, as well of course as the (far more powerful and more dishonest) «climate
action will ruin our living standards» lot.
As well, both
agree that the
point in time at which the assessment is to be made is when the
action in initiated.
(Notably, the Ninth Circuit also seemed to
agree on this
point, though less emphatically and it still have a pending en banc
action to sort through post - Booker / Rita realities for its district courts.)
In
agreeing that the standard of review was that of reasonableness, the Supreme Court of Canada clarified a
point that had been unclear: [80] the same general principles apply to the review of municipal bylaws as apply to the review of administrative
action.
In particular, we want to
point out that by accepting these Terms, you and we are
agreeing to arbitrate any dispute between us, and you are giving up your right to go to court either individually (except for matters that may be taken to small claims court) or as part of a class
action.
The Court of Appeal
agreed with the motion judge that the fourth condition of discoverability under the Limitations Act, 2002 is met at the
point when the claimant not only knows the factual circumstances of the loss she has suffered, but also knows that «having regard to the nature of the injury, loss or damage», an
action is an appropriate remedy.
Client
agreed to certain contingency arrangements «of any money recovered» at various
points of the legal proceedings, with attorney granted a lien on «any recovery [client] may obtain in the court
action....»
But as my colleague Jeff Roberts
points out, IV's primary business is that of a patent troll, vigorously pursuing legal
action against companies that don't
agree to license its vast trove of intellectual property.
A good mediator's expertise is bringing people with different
points of view to
agree on a course of
action that meets their needs.
Parenting coordination can be ordered at any
point of a civil
action involving custody of parenting, and parents may also request and
agree to use a parenting coordinator when they are unable to resolve disputes without help (Carter, 2011).
Would you
agree that a downside to audio books is the inability to capture
action items or
points that you would want to be able to revisit later?
Possibly this is all
pointing toward a need for an oversight committee to be formed to investigate CREA, and report to the membership, whereupon
actions can be initiated as decided by resolutions similar to Fette's or by other
agreed upon mechanisms.