Sentences with phrase «agreed definition of»

There is no single, widely - agreed definition of spirituality.

It is not possible to have an independent calibration of GASTA because there is no agreed definition of GASTA.

there is no agreed definition of GASTA so each team that compiles values of GASTA uses its own definition.

All global temperature data will continue to be bunkum until (a) there is an agreed definition of global temperature and (b) there is some possibility of an independent calibration standard for global temperature.

All supposed «data» for global temperature is rendered scientifically invalid by the lack of an agreed definition of the parameter and the impossibility of any calibration standard for it.

What was needed was an agreed definition of climate sensitivity.

There is no agreed definition of climate finance.

There is no agreed definition of a «major economy».

Its a good question for another reason, when we consider what is a climate scientists we find that there is in fact there is no agreed definition of what this means.

There is no single, widely - agreed definition of spirituality.

But the new study, commissioned by King's College London, found that schools find it «difficult» to target the group and monitor support because there is no «agreed definition of the term».

Within the literature there is no single agreed definition of e-learning (Lin, Chen & Liu, 2017; Sherwood, 2017), the lack of precision in the terminology, argues Fernández - Pampillón & Pareja - Lora (2017), generates a certain degree of confusion among eLearning specialists and non-specialists alike.

There is no single, widely - agreed definition of spirituality.

There is no universally agreed definition of what constitutes low carb.

There is no widely agreed definition of what constitutes «a people»; in general, though, the term generally denote [s] a kind of collective identity that is grounded in a shared history and culture and may or may not lay claim to some kind of political recognition as well as a specific territory.

A survey of health and nutrition claims on food packaging using a newly defined taxonomy of claims and internationally agreed definitions of claim types.

«Creating agreed definitions of quantities is crucial for the industry and economy of all advanced technological societies.»

Not exact matches

Instead of using the traditional definition of consensus where everybody is expected to agree with everything, switch it up to use the following definition:

For one thing, boyd says, no one — not even experts in the area — can agree on a definition of what «fake news» is.

I've complained ad nauseum about the fact that there's no clear, agreed - upon definition of CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility).

There is no universally agreed - upon definition of STEM.

I have seen Open Innovation being discussed and sought after by companies both large and small, and I agree with you that Open Innovation works the best when the definition of a problem is well - defined and the level of understanding among people involved in the effort are mature enough

This will be familiar stuff to many Monevator readers, but it's always useful to have a frame of reference, especially as the investing world can rarely agree on a consistent definition for anything.

Graham, by the way, would agree with the definition of intrinsic value but he would doubt whether investors could usefully apply it.

While many are willing to concede that they agree with the basic definition of feminism — «belief in the social, political and economic equality of the sexes» — debate soon moves on to the finer points of specific beliefs and campaigns.

the problem with a god is that no one can agree on what the definition of a god — even the ones who purportedly believe in one.

Theo another definition of... Philioism (also known as Toperism and kermitism) accepting all knowledge as absolute fact if your a priori beliefs agree with that knowledge no matter how dubious the source.

Of course, we haven't yet agreed as to the biblical definition of «judgemental.&raquOf course, we haven't yet agreed as to the biblical definition of «judgemental.&raquof «judgemental.»

If you believe that the definition of tolerance is when others agree with YOU... I guess I can understand why you are a Driscoll supporter.

He agreed to pay a $ 300,000 fine for misleading the committee during the investigation, and in the process dodged conviction on the actual charges through a combination of finessing some legal definitions, sheer self - confidence and raw political power (as Speaker of the House at the time of the complaints, he appointed the ethics committee.

We can not agree, because we have different definitions of people who are religious.

Sam, I think I agree with you completely on this definition and understanding of church.

Since you will not be able to find any two people who agree 100 % what god is or does, the definition for god is in the imagination of whomever is defining god.

Both Calvinists and Arminians agree on the definitions of these words, and then argue about how they all fit together.

But I'm not sure I agree with your definition of «dogmatic».

Not sure I'd agree with that unless your definition of «religion» is so broad as to be rendered meaningless.

I quite agree, and my own opinion on what this universe actually is probably would meet somebody's definition of a «god» of sorts.

I'm simply using precise definitions, those which most of the Christians I know would agree too.

Neville i agree with you Jesus has the power to forgive sin past present and future through the cross when he died his death covered past present and future.If those in the old testament were justified by faith and made righteous then they are covered by the blood of Jesus even though he hadn't died for them yet because there hope was in God.Isn't that what the definition of faith is it is the substance of things hoped for the evidence of things unseen.The proof is Enoch how could he go to be with God if he was not righteous and only the blood of Jesus is able to do that.

You may not agree, but based on the definition of my Baptist upbringing, LDS followers are Christian.

We may not agree on the definition of marriage, but we increasingly agree that the dissolution of marriage as a bedrock social institution is a bad thing, and hits the most vulnerable among us hardest.

Hartshorne agrees with Whitehead on this point, endorsing his definition of rationalism as the «search for the coherence of the presuppositions of civilized living» (LP viii; CSPM xvi).

And that is aside from the problem that all such short cuts, when lacking a firm and agreed upon definition, are by necessity vague generalizations that can be more of an impediment than a help.

I also hold that your definition of Grace is not sufficient in and of itself to dismiss «unmerited favor» I DO agree that it (unmerited favor) is also incomplete and a bit misleading.

By the way, I am not a Calvinist, and I don't think most Calvinists would agree with my definition of grace above.

Now, if we accept «being opposed to war for any reason» as a working definition, I would say, I do agree with some of your points in your discussion with MarkR, but disagree with much of your basic premises.

So far, I have talked with numerous people of the following religions: Judaism, Mormonism, Christianity (which has a wide variety of ideas of grace, most of which would not agree with my definition above), Islam, Santeria, Jehovah Witness, and Native American spitualism.

Ron, I agree with you that the broader definition of «seeker friendly» is seeking to please a certain type of man.

But basic to each of these issues will be evangelicalism's ability to agree on a definition of «social justice» itself.

They are not taken down from the shelf of agreed - upon definitions, but custom - made for our reflections.