Sentences with phrase «agreed selling price»

A home appraisal is an expert opinion of a home's value and it ensures the lender that their loan will be well - spent, or at least up to par with the agreed selling price.

And the buyer was obligated to pony up the agreed selling price at closing, and did so.

Not exact matches

The Trump administration in recent weeks applied tariffs to imports of Canadian lumber, agreed to investigate charges that Bombardier is using government subsidies to sell its new plane at unfair prices, and triggered the legislative process that will lead to a renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement.

Google offered between $ 200 million and $ 300 million, according to a report, but the two companies couldn't agree on a selling price.

Avion Spirits LLC, owner of a fairly young but rapidly growing tequila brand, agreed Friday to sell a «significant majority stake» to Pernod Ricard in a deal that could further propel the premium priced tequila in bars and liquor cabinets.

Still, many brands worry that once they agree to sell on Amazon they will be pressured to slash prices, which would hurt profit margins.

That is, if the market price of the stock is higher than the strike price, then the ETF will be obliged to sell the stock for the agreed strike price and then buy it back at the higher market price.

Futures markets are essentially an agreement to buy or sell something at a future date at an agreed - upon price and exist for a wide range of markets.

While some Uber investors said that they would agree to sell their shares, several others have privately expressed their unwillingness to let go of Uber shares at such a price.

In other words, you purchased a virtual coin, and then sold it to the retailer or service in question for the agreed upon price.

A I would agree that you don't have the control over the buy and sell price through dividend reinvestment plans that you have investing with a broker.

A repo is a contract between two counterparties where one agrees to sell a bond to the other and repurchase it at a specified price at some date in the future.

The relative lack of liquidity in the bond market and the fact that it is oriented for institutional investors rather than retail investors means that you really want to know where a bond has been trading before agreeing to buy or sell at a given price (be careful not to get ripped off).

Joint cuts of 1.8 million b / d have reduced OECD oil inventories towards their five - year average and cleared most of the global glut, with the Saudis cutting even deeper than agreed in an attempt to lift prices well above US$ 80 before selling off shares in Aramco.

According to the almighty online brain trust, Wikipedia, royalties are: «typically agreed upon as a percentage of gross or net revenues derived from the use of an asset or a fixed price per unit sold of an item...» In layman's terms, royalties are a form of passive income that you obtain through the sale or use of something you own.

A contract that gives you the right or obligation to buy or sell an underlying security at an agreed - upon price on or before a specific date.

At age ninety and with no heirs, Jeanne agreed to sell her apartment to Raffray for the price of a low monthly subsistence payment of 2,500 francs.

* A repurchase agreement is an agreement to buy a security at one price and a simultaneous agreement to sell it back at an agreed - upon price.

It is understood Member States have again agreed not to sell any skimmed milk powder (SMP) out of public intervention this week after the Commission recommended to refuse all the offers on the count that they were well below prevailing market prices.

A2 plans to offer 40 million shares at NZ50 cents a share, a discount to the market price of NZ68 cents, while its three largest shareholders — Freedom, Mountain Road Investments and EGI - Fund investors — have agreed to sell up to 140 million shares, increasing liquidity in the company.

If Arsenal will agree to pay Everton's selling price.

Even though he wanted to go to Barca, Liverpool wouldn't have sold if Barca hadn't agreed to pay that price.

Mustafi agrees personal terms with inter,, sky Italia,, we have become a selling club in name of clearing Deadwoods the greedy board want to get money from players sales and reduce wagebill yeah we have to pay the price of lack champions league money to the board.

It is not down to Arsenal just to buy a player... the selling club has to a) want to sell b) agree a price and c) ensure they have someone else to replace who they are selling Additionally because of FFP and Home - Grown rules it does nt make sense to buy all your players and then suddenly you could get 2 - 3 major injuries and have to buy someone else but then cant because you have no monies or might have to sell someone to be able to do so So many people saying negative things and that we should just go and buy and yet at the same time why spend so much on someone when we could have got somebody else!

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

For me, he did no damage to his value, though I would agree with many that the price PSG paid was severely inflated, and the price they are likely to sell him for will also likely be more than he is worth.

At first, the inmates ran in cutoff blue jeans and cheap tennis shoes, but in time running shorts were allowed by the authorities and the owner of a store catering to runners agreed to sell quality shoes at substantially reduced prices.

However do agree with Stan on one thing, there are better ways to earn Mooney then football, Stan can now sell his shares and walk away with 1.5 billion or more GBP he can generate 10 % return on that money which is around 150 million GBP while his not earning anything now only the Value of the club is going up and i fear that what with the new prices and salaries of football players i can see a decline starting in a few years, so is he good for us in the future?

He was eventually sold when Barca agreed to that price tag.

However I would not choose to ever order from a co-op that has files applications with the manufacturer under false statements, or breaks the pricing rules they agreed to, or asks the members to not share the pricing they have sold the product for.

But they can — and do — make retailers sign a contract stating that they agree not to sell below a certain price.

It's possible that a particularly unhygienic car dealer, for instance, could make a difference to the price for which you agree to sell your vehicle.

Coach Bags Many people Coach Factory Outlet love these people and also take hold of these people as theCoach Outlet Store Online esigner ladies handbag series, they will often put a new clearance selling to help create way with the brand - new types heading towards appear Coach Outlet Online The Coach Outlet particular house can be blemish and also water - resistant as well, so it Coach Outlet Online is fairly quick for all of us for Coach Outlet Online you to area If you come across a piece this agrees with your quality, it's possible to talk a very Coach Outlet Store Online good selling price considering the save operator, if your handbag Coach bagscan be a sham Bogus luggage brings Guru bags are generally grouped suitable miscellany regarding different Coach Online types this consist of satchels, Coach Outlet Stroe Online crossbody luggage, we can be your best choice because we can give you Cheap Coach Outlet Store Online with high quality.

FINFEED - Mar 15 - DateTix has agreed to sell a non-core consulting business for a possible sale price of $ 780K, adding cash to its dating app marketing push.

The play's principals agreed to sell the tickets for student matinees for $ 70, essentially the breakeven price point.

On the same day, Eddie Jordan confirmed that Toyota had agreed to sell him engines at an «affordable price».

Either people agreed with us and Lexus is lowering the price with the hopes that more units will sell and even out their bottom line, or the company thinks more people should get the chance to drive around in their pseudo-sports car.

They agreed on a price and a couple minutes after they refused to sell the car on the agreed price. - joy

So if an author agrees to sell the Kindle book for 20 % less on Amazon (per B&N demand), then B&N can price match the author's book down 20 % on B&N... in which case the author must drop her Kindle price to 20 % less than that... and it becomes a revolving door requiring the author to price her books ever lower?

And since you're probably wondering, we should point out that by distributing your book to these sites, you have to agree to sell the book for the same price everywhere, so you can't sell your book for $ 2.99 on Amazon and more on BN.com to make up the royalty percentage difference.

Amazon is talking about ebook sales going to authors while print book sales would go to Hatchette and if Hatchette had agreed to this - showing they cared about their authors - Amazon would go back to large restocking / reorders on print books, discounting print books instead of selling them at the absurd high prices set by Hatchette which they've been complaining about, and re-enabling pre-order buttons.

It can sell for more than the price agreed with the writer — in which case, the writer still receives $ 2.10.

The baker, if selling direct, agrees to a price for the goods.

This Section V.F shall not prohibit a Settling Defendant from communicating (a) in a manner and through media consistent with common and reasonable industry practice, the cover prices or wholesale or retail prices of books sold in any format to potential purchasers of those books; or (b) information the Settling Defendant needs to communicate in connection with (i) its enforcement or assignment of its intellectual property or contract rights, (ii) a contemplated merger, acquisition, or purchase or sale of assets, (iii) its distribution of another E-book Publisher's E-books, or (iv) a business arrangement under which E-book Publishers agree to co-publish, or an E-book Publisher agrees to license to another E-book Publisher the publishing rights to, one or more specifically identified E-book titles or a particular author's E-books.

So I agree with you, for the authors they need to think about selling the book, with pretty covers and a nice price, because I don't buy indie books over 3.99 and only if it's a really great plot.

They've tried to do that recently with some small presses, removing their titles from Amazon unless the presses agree to sell their books at rock - bottom wholesale prices.

After countless hours of legal battle, Macmillan has finally agreed upon a settlement that appeased Judge Denise Cote and the plaintiffs in the lawsuit that alleged five of the Big Six publishers conspired with Apple to fix the prices on ebooks sold through online retailers.

That means we agree to certain royalties, pricing levels and that we won't sell our titles for less anywhere else.

Three analysts agreed that Barnes & Noble won't want to be beaten by Amazon.com on price, since it already sells a 7 - in.

Let's say the publisher has agreed to pay you a royalty of 8 % on the retail price of the book, and your book is going to sell for $ 14.00.