Sentences with phrase «agreed time scales»

Proven track record of efficiently diagnosing and resolving complex customer issues within agreed time scales.

Effectively manage schedules and staffing to ensure calls answered within agreed time scales.

Not exact matches

Social blogging can be a great way to scale a small company because the mediums are often free (it doesn't cost you anything to sign up for Facebook, Twitter, tumblr, etc.) and experts agree that most companies will get a solid return on investment from the time they spend interacting with customers online.

Agree that there will come times that the numbers show that the business model you picked is not worth scaling into a company.

1) I agree that over your time scale TER should be the most important cost.

People are asked to rate themselves on a seven - point scale from «completely agree» to «completely disagree» with such statements as, «When shopping, I have a hard time finding clothing that I really love» or «Whenever I watch TV, I channel surf.»

RA's «Use of Seal» Guidelines dated December 2007 (PDF) states that «Companies requesting to use the RAC seal on single - ingredient products with less than 90 % certified content should also agree to a SmartSourceTM plan: a step-wise approach to scaling up the percentage of certified content over time with specific benchmarks and timelines along the path of sustainability.»

«Will you agree to a ministerial statement on this matter to bring the time scale forward for implementation by the MoD?»

If clock time gets more than about 0.4 seconds out of step with astronomical time then the Earth Orientation Center of the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) based in the Paris Observatory announce a leap second needs to be inserted so that the two time scales always agree to better than one second.

We may also agree that, as with any large - scale investigation, better procedures could have been in place, more evidence could have been uncovered, more time spent investigating, and more carefully crafted conclusions proffered.

We explicitly agree (final paragraph of main article) that the climate has historically shown significant variability on all time scales.

I noted that I agree with him on the time scale of energy transitions (which is why I've supported domestic drilling while we still use oil, rather than exporting the hazards to places less able or willing to safeguard lives and the environment).

I would tend to agree; whatever divergence there is, it ain't much (at least over that time scale).

I agree that the Arctic Oscillation (AO) is a major player in Northern Hemisphere winter from daily to seasonal time scales.

Richard... I'm glad that you agree that pretty much any data set you choose in the 15 year time scale is not going to be statistically significant at the 95 % confidence level.

Ok so we can agree they get it wrong on short time scales.

Everyone agrees big changes can happen fast on climate time - scales.

But a single time scale just doesn't express the multi-compartment transfer rates — a fifth to a third of the CO2 remains in the atmosphere after even a 40 - year half - life of ocean equilibration (which quite frankly agrees with my numbers — I get about a back of the envelope number of ~ 37 years half - life, depending on the saturation limits), and the rest will be around for quite a while.

You do conclude that we tend to agree that current models are unable to simulate the natural variations on decadal (and longer) time scales.

I agree that the ambition to make (regional) climate predictions even at decadal or longer time scales can not be supported by the current apparent feasibility, given the studies that demonstrate the lack of predictive skill.

It appears we agree on the inability of the global models to simulate the natural variations on decadal and, presumably longer time scales, of large scale circulation patterns such as ENSO, the PDO, the NAO etc..

I think we should conclude that we agree on the fact that on shorter (decadal) time scales GCM / RCM have shown little regional skill to predict / hindcast observed changes.

An analysis of two coupled atmosphere - ocean general circulation models control runs (UK Met Office HadCM3 and NOAA GFDL CM2.1) agree with the shorter and longer time - scales of Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) and temperature fluctuations with periodicities close to those observed.

Does everyone agree that this is a fair interpretation of the time scales mentioned?

But I gather that Gunnar agrees with Mandelbrot — that although it may be possible to separate out the characteristic time - scales of weather vs. climate, there are phenomena that span the threshold — «rivers in oceans» being one example.

In response to questions from Fox News, a UNEP spokesman declared that «The recommendations of the auditors are now being implemented by UNEP under a practical and agreed time - scale and via a Task Force and, as is standard practice, we report back to the [U.N. auditors] every six months».

I would agree that once you start looking at much longer time scales, the whole concept of an equilibrium climate looks increasingly dubious.

As seen in Figure 6, particularly the higher - frequency variations in the two radionuclide estimates agree rather well in phase and show higher amplitudes than the geomagnetic reconstructions, confirming the results by Snowball et al. (2007) that variations in radionuclide production rates on up to multi-centennial time scales are dominated by solar magnetic field variations.

For appropriate time scales (say, as short as an El Nino cycle or longer than 1000 years) it seems pretty clear that natural causes are dominant, so it's perfectly reasonable to disagree with, or give a «Can't answer» response to Bray's question, while agreeing with the IPCC view.

The present finding that the low - frequency portion of the regional data agrees with the global mean (with a scaling that is slightly larger than 1) during the 162 - y overlap period supports the notion (but does not prove) that a single time series can, in fact, be used to represent the global mean variation.

What I particularly like about the presentation is that he agrees there is a «consensus», but that this consensus isn't that weather will become «worse» in every respect imaginable, largely it'll just grow a little warmer (and slowly on human time scales, not least due to thermal inertia).

they show that the various spagetti graph recons do NOT agree with one another at much of any time scale.

Models and reconstructions seem to agree that the AMOC has substantial natural variability on decadal (10 - 100 years) time scales.

When BTC1, the protocol implementation based on the New York Agreement, agreed to implement the BIP91 «kludge,» the two main scaling proposals were potentially aligned in compatibility to activate SegWit — if miners would activate the soft fork in time.

The Life Orientation Test (LOT; Scheier & Carver, 1985) examines individual's tendency to believe that he / she will experience good or bad outcomes in his / her life using eight items rated on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from «Totally Disagree» to «Totally Agree» (e.g., «In Uncertain times, I usually expect the best»).

Strength of beliefs about the illness was measured on patient rated seven point Likert - type scales («totally agree» to «totally disagree») and frequency of coping behaviours (for example, avoiding exercise) on five point patient rated scales («never» to «all the time»).

Family functioning was assessed with an 8 - item scale (α =.83, N = 546) measuring the functionality of the family (eg, there are lots of bad feelings in our family; in times of crises, we can turn to each other for support; we don't get along well together).50 Mothers answered on a scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree).

Items concerned views on the amount of time available to spend with their child (coded on a 4 - point scale from «nowhere enough time» to «plenty of time»); and agreement with three statements: «Because of my work responsibilities I have missed out on home or family activities that I would like to have taken part»; «Because of my work responsibilities my family time is less enjoyable and more pressured»; «Because of my family responsibilities the time I spend working is less enjoyable and more pressured» (all measured using a 5 - point scale from «agree strongly» to «disagree strongly»).

The 32 - item Dyadic Adjustment Scale (Spanier, 1976) measured marital quality, with varying response scales (e.g., 6 - point scales of frequency all the time to never and frequency of agreement always agree to always disagree).

Dyadic adjustment was measured using the Abbreviated Dyadic Adjustment Scale (Sharpley & Rogers, 1984; German translation, Köppe, 2001), and specifically quantified here as an individual's rating of agreement with partner on the amount of time spent together on a 6 - point scale (0 = always disagree to 5 = always agree; M = 3.99, SD = 0Scale (Sharpley & Rogers, 1984; German translation, Köppe, 2001), and specifically quantified here as an individual's rating of agreement with partner on the amount of time spent together on a 6 - point scale (0 = always disagree to 5 = always agree; M = 3.99, SD = 0scale (0 = always disagree to 5 = always agree; M = 3.99, SD = 0.79).

On Abelson's test, developed specifically for potential real estate salespeople, applicants are asked to rate their responses to statements like «It is easy for me to separate myself from work» and «I think about work all of the time» on a continuum scale that ranges from «I strongly agree» to «I strongly disagree».