Sentences with phrase «agreed with a federal ruling»

At that time, the FCC chairman essentially agreed with a federal ruling that would have given ISPs a free hand in setting access to the Web — largely tossing out the underpinnings of net neutrality.

Not exact matches

They warn that the B.C. government is «trying to break the rules of Confederation and ignore the national climate plan, choosing to agree with only parts of the federal decision.»

Judge Weinstein's ruling is important, as it is the first federal court decision to address — and agree with — the CFTC's determination that virtual currencies are commodities as defined by the CEA.

He agreed with me about the «basic immorality of the administration's rule» — that to whomever it applied (i.e., all the not - exempted), it would put the legal authority of the federal government behind the mandatory provision of early - stage pharmaceutical abortions.

«Consistent with court rulings here in Colorado and around the country, the federal court agreed that the part of Colorado election law that requires petition collectors to be state residents is unconstitutional and unduly infringes on the First Amendment rights of voters and petition circulators.»

Under an interim rule, the USDA agreed to bar WIC participants from buying potatoes with their federal dollars.

The parties agree that any and all controversies, disputes or claims arising out of or under this Agreement, shall be exclusively governed and decided by binding arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act in conformity with the Rules and Procedures as established by the American Arbitration Association, and the determination of the arbitrator shall be final and binding (except to the extent there exist grounds for vacation of an award under applicable arbitration statutes).

States, of course, can stick with the traditional rules for spending federal Title I money, but if they want additional money from Trump, they have to agree to his choice proposal.

You agree to comply with all laws, rules and regulations (for example, federal, state, local and provincial) applicable to your use of the Services and content appearing therein, including but not limited to, copyright laws.

I agree with the warning that the Federal Circuit's ruling, if allowed to stand, would turn design patents into «a weapon to take profits from others, even where those profits are attributable to their own innovations that have nothing to do with the patentee's ornamental design.»

The Federal Court, without concentrating on the Charter issue, agreed with Ishaq's positions, but went further by ruling that the CIC policy is inconsistent with the Citizenship Act.

It is not true to say that there is «only minimal regulation» of arbitration in the US: arbitrations are conducted under law, usually the Federal Arbitration Act but sometimes equivalent state laws and must be conducted in accordance with the rules agreed to by the parties.

Response: We agree with the comments that proposed § 164.510 (n) was necessary to harmonize the rule with existing state and federal laws mandating uses and disclosures of protected health information.

Most of the attendees agreed that given the shift toward agreement in the federal Circuits that an unaccepted offer of judgment does not moot class claims, along with the fact that the Supreme Court has granted certiorari on that very issue in Campbell - Ewald Company v. Gomez, it would be premature to propose any significant revisions to the rules dealing with Rule 68 offers.

The ruling, which also found Yelp has a right to engage in «hard bargaining,» agreed with a lower court's decision to throw out the case because the businesses had failed to make a claim that Yelp violated state or federal unfair competition law.

Even though a federal court agreed with the New York Times and tossed the claims in 2013, the case sprang back to life last month after an appeals court ruled that the patent claims are not «exhausted.»

If you both agree on an amount and you need to go to court with your case, a judge may use that amount to calculate child support if the amount seems reasonable, based on the documents required and rules found in the Federal Guidelines.

Although a federal district court initially reversed this ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed with the initial decision.

The United States Tax Court agreed with the IRS's determination and ruled that Teruya had to recognize the Gain on its federal tax returns.