Sentences with phrase «agreeing with your point»

I agree with your point that paying for her son's college is not an option right now.

Which is why I agree with your point.

I agree with your points against muni's and corporate bonds for ladders though — in terms of expense and risk, which is why I avoid them.

But I agree with your point that Buffett sold AMEX and DIS just as Graham bought and sold stocks as they reached fair value.

Agree with both your points, 1) currency can cut both ways and 2) there are some great non US based companies to invest in.

I agree with your point that there's nothing to be gained by being overly specific.

Hey Eric, I completely agree with all your points.

Very happy to see your article, I very much to like and agree with your point of view.

I agree with all points, except that if Buyers stay put the market will «come back around to them».

I agree with his point as well, even though I would never try to make a point in the same manor as he did.

Do I agree with their point of view... No.

Frankly, I like it and generally agree with all his points.

It sounds like you agreed with my point about the requirement of reading the Quran in Arabic as being absurd... then again... the following words don't make any sense... perhaps you missed some punctuation.

Mohammed was a murderer in his own right and would kill back when he was alive if you did not agree with his point of view.

There are plenty of us who agree with his point of view on many issues.

I agree with your point of government being an enabler of the poor.

Gary: I think I agree with your point that «if 1 man and 1 woman was a normal teaching of Paul's» for all believers, then it follows that the text either means «this is only for the elders and higher positions» OR that the text was referring to some other situation, such as marrying a divorced woman.

I agree with all your points.

@Dave, «I just agreed with his point, and made no mention of my own religion or lack thereof.

I just agreed with his point, and made no mention of my own religion or lack thereof.

thank you for agreeing with my point from page 13.

While I do not agree with every point the author is making, I agree there is intention in absolutely everything in the universe.

I agree with your point, just one correction: «carbon dated to 250 + million years.»

well, i would have debating it with you being i like Aquinas but i agree with your point about how it is very outdated... however it does give insight into many things about how and why such beliefs are held with high regard.

Joh - I understand your point and I agree with your point.

While I agree with you point I hope he discards his faith like the bad habit it is... I didn't lose faith, I discarded it as useless tool.

A few of you gave me things to move forward on, a few criticized me, someone you don't know, for not agreeing with your point of view.

If you do not agree with my point, then you should be able to provide statistics showing this is not true.

I agree with point # 1 — everything changes and ends.

We largely agree with the points he raises, but then again, we made many of those points in our article.

I agree with the point of your article, BUT your reference to a «conditional covenant» is the same reasoning that leads to protesters at soldiers» funerals and claims that Hurricane Katrina is an act of God's wrath (although I don't think there was agreement on what God was mad about).

Paul, I agree with your points, and similar points were made in the longer article, but I think these points support the idea of two men in one bed rather than undermine it.

Anyway... I agree with the point that the article is making.

No, I agree with these points — I am just pointing out how people like that guy who calls himself «infidel» are making up quotes from the Quran, and not giving the proper context.

I tend to agree with a point Sam Harris made some time back, I don't know if it's useful to label ourselves.

It was wrong then, and it is wrong now, and you appear to agree with that point too.

Panexperientialism agrees with this point even with regard to individual entities, as the experience of the vast majority of them is said not to be conscious.

I agree with points that both of you make and am studying all of this right along with both of you.

While I don't agree with every point in every one of these comments, articles, and quotes — I've included thoughts from Christians, Jews, and even atheists — I think they provide great fodder for conversation and may help you as you work through all this on your own.

As much as I agree with your points on the misleading t itle, you should leave the personal a s s umptions alone.

Fishon: The Mark passage you cite agrees with my point regarding St. Paul's passage.

I totally agree with your point of view, but keep in mind that they have freedom to do as they choose (within reason).

I certainly agree with your point about dualism.

I thought it'd be interesting to participate in something where I didn't agree with every point of view.»

Could have had me fooled... listen, I may not agree with your point of view, but there's no need to compare me to Hitler, ok??

Hello Emilio — I by and large agree with your points that the Abraham / Issac episode was a «Type» (although # 4 might be a stretch); a foreshadowing of the coming of Jesus.

I am very liberal about religion, and understand and agree with the point you are trying to make with irony here, but the statement above is also, I think, sadly, a legitimate way to interpret the gospels.

«Whenever you have a scenario where, in this country, all consumer goods manufacturers have to deal with a very concentrated retail environment, you will go through periods of trading where you may not necessarily agree with their point of view, and they may not necessarily agree with our point of view.»

I totally agree with your point about the arrival of Aketxe having something to do with Osorio's recent form (I would include Delgado too).

I think others are agreeing with the point I was trying to make and not yours.