While some couples can only come to
an agreement through litigation, this is not always the case.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply
agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future
litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables
through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Instead of threatening to take down the deal
through legislation or
litigation, Republicans released a few muted statements arguing that the global
agreement would falter on its own.
GOVERNING LAW: This
agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Kenya, and any
litigation necessary to resolve disputes between the parties shall be filled in the courts located in Kenya, where such a dispute can not be solved
through arbitration.
We help universities build their patent portfolios, develop and negotiate licensing and technology transfer
agreements and, when necessary, diligently enforce IP rights
through litigation.
The parties and their attorneys sign a Participation
Agreement committing to resolve all divorce issues
through cooperation and negotiation, and not
litigation.
Any repayment, under the funding
agreement is contingent upon the direction and time frame of the Plaintiffs» personal injury
litigation, which may be resolved
through a myriad of possible outcomes, such as settlement, dismissal, summary judgment, or trial.»
In order to recover the costs incurred by going
through the process of mediation in the pre-trial stages of
litigation, the costs must first be proportionate to the factors set out in CPR 44.3 (5), unless the mediation
agreement itself dictates how costs are to be apportioned between the parties.
Therefore, it's always important to have an employment lawyer who understands your business and can counsel you
through the legal issues you may face on a day - to - day basis, including employment
agreements, non-disclosure
agreements, employee handbooks and benefits, discrimination and harassment, workers» compensation, taxes and employment
litigation.
If you and your spouse decide to go
through with the divorce and can agree on the terms, you can create a Divorce Settlement
Agreement and avoid expensive and wrenching
litigation.
Where those disputes can not be resolved
through negotiation and
agreement, clients may need representation in
litigation or commercial arbitration.
Whether you are drafting employee contracts, dealing with commercial real estate issues, going
through an acquisition or need assistance with a variety of other contracts including non-compete and purchase sale
agreements, you can count on Jeanette to deliver the most reliable and professional business
litigation around.
With researchers such as Christopher Enright and his method for
litigation, and Julian Ehrlich's
Agreement Engineering for contract negotiation both starting to be used, the legal system could go
through the same user - driven systematization / productization revolutions which have transformed other sectors.
If an
agreement can not be reached and all routes for negotiations have been exhausted, we are fully prepared to aggressively protect your rights and interests
through litigation.
Actions may involve resolving title issues, deed - in - lieu - of - foreclosures, personal property seizure and resales, short sales, modifications, forbearance
agreements, rent seizures, evaluating security interests, engineering receivership actions for performing assets, confirmation actions,
litigation and deficiency actions, writs of possession, and collecting judgments
through garnishments and seizures.
When a court in Indiana issues a dissolution of marriage, it approves the divorce
agreement as reached either by both parties
through mediation or by the court following
litigation or some combination of both.
Mr. Shafir focuses his practice on two areas at the cutting edge of California law: (1) the law of protected speech, including the First Amendment, defamation, California's anti-SLAPP statute, and the
litigation privilege; and (2) the defense of class and representative actions, often
through resisting class certification efforts or the enforcement of arbitration
agreements.
During his years of practice, Mr. Villavaso has carefully assisted clients
through the criminal and civil
litigation process by successfully negotiating settlement
agreements and plea
agreements with the foresight of experience.
Our funding process - from initial intake and negotiation of a term sheet,
through due diligence, execution of funding
agreements, and implementation over the life of the
litigation - has been developed, and is conducted with, the highest ethical standard of performance in mind.
Parties considering whether to resolve disputes
through arbitration or
litigation should first look to their
agreements to determine the appropriate course.
Instead, native title
agreements are seen simply as settlements of a legal dispute - and once a native title case is resolved, whether
through litigation or
agreements, governments walk away from a process which, for Indigenous people, has only just begun.
This will be achieved
through negotiating
agreements and avoiding
litigation.
The Australian Government said clearly that the main reason for amending the guidelines was to «focus on resolution of native title issues
through agreement making, in preference to
litigation».
Because of the dominance of a
litigation model in native title negotiations, the relationship between the State and the native title claim group begins with the filing of a native title claim and tends to end with the resolution of that claim either
through litigation or by
agreement of the parties.
The Attorney - General concluded the media release with the claim that the Government's in - principle
agreement highlights it willingness to give effect to its policy of seeking to reach outcomes
through negotiation rather than
litigation wherever possible.
Thus, a hallmark of the Collaborative Practice process is that
agreement is reached
through discussion, negotiation and compromise without the financial and emotional cost, aggravation and uncertainty of adversarial
litigation at court.
Negotiated
agreements can be reached
through a more traditional model of divorce representation, where the option of contested
litigation is always available if settlement breaks down, or can be accomplished by alternative forms of dispute resolution.
Also, people may be more committed to an
agreement that is reached cooperatively (as opposed to an
agreement reached
through litigation).
A concept which appears to be given general support from government, industry and Indigenous parties alike, is the benefit of negotiating native title, its recognition and its relationship to other interests on the land,
through agreement rather than
litigation.
Child custody modifications can be best handled with a trained mediator, and many families find that mediation makes modifying the child custody
agreement simpler, faster, and, ultimately, more agreeable than going
through traditional
litigation channels.
Instead of addressing the issue of a parenting plan in court,
through litigation, it is often in the best interests of all parties involved, especially the children, that divorcing spouses cooperate and use mediation as a means of reaching a mutually satisfying
agreement.
Unlike the traditional
litigation approach where each party is represented by an attorney and the matter proceeds
through the courts, mediation allows the parties to work together with the help of a trained professional, to discuss their issues and to arrive at an
agreement that works best for both of them and for their family.