Governments and the aviation industry have welcomed new proposed
aircraft emissions standards - which rather suggests that the new rules don't go far enough.
Not exact matches
As part of a close collaboration between Empa, SR Technics and FOCA experts have spent years developing a
standard test setup and method that can be used to measure fine particulate
emissions from
aircraft engines.
The Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) recently approved a preliminary
standard governing the
emission of particulates by
aircraft engines.
Airplane makers are already building more fuel efficient
aircraft, such as the Boeing 787 and Airbus A350, and they are expected to already meet the proposed ICAO
emissions standards.
Most observers expect the EPA to say that aviation
emissions endanger public health but are not sure how much the agency and the Federal Aviation Authority will reveal about their vision for a carbon dioxide
emissions standard for new
aircraft.
The American Lung Association supports
emissions requirements for
aircraft that are comparable in stringency to other mobile source
emissions standards and supports measures, including regulation, to reduce aviation
emissions.
In recent years, climate activists have pushed the International Civil Aviation Organization to introduce stricter
emissions standards for
aircraft.
In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Organization developed a range of
standards, policies and guidance material for the application of integrated measures to address
aircraft noise and
emissions embracing technological improvements, operating procedures, proper organization of air traffic, appropriate airport and land - use planning, and the use of market - based options.
-- In establishing
standards applicable to
emissions of greenhouse gases pursuant to this section and sections 202 (a), 213 (a)(4) and (5), and 231 (a), the Administrator may establish provisions for averaging, banking, and trading of greenhouse gas
emissions credits within or across classes or categories of motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines, nonroad vehicles and engines (including marine vessels), and
aircraft and
aircraft engines, to the extent the Administrator determines appropriate and considering the factors appropriate in setting
standards under those sections.
The EPA could finally act on petitions pending from the Bush administration to set GHG
emission standards for marine vessels,
aircraft, and non-road vehicles.
This
standard applies whenever EPA wishes to regulate
emissions from vehicles, non-road engines,
aircraft, power plants, industrial facilities, etc..
Once the EPA has determined that
aircraft emissions are a problem, it will be required to do something about it, by crafting and adopting
emissions standards for
aircraft.
As both the House and the Senate grapple with proposed carbon - cutting measures — carbon taxes and «cap - and - trade» schemes for big CO2 emitters such as coal - fired power plants; increased Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE)
standards for cars, SUVs, and trucks; and mandatory set - asides for clean renewable energy in the mix of energy generation options —
emissions from
aircraft seem, at least for the time being, to have gone over the heads of most policymakers engaged in the rush to cut carbon
emissions.
In addition, the Endangerment Rule authorizes or obligates EPA to establish: (1) greenhouse gas
emission standards for heavy trucks, marine vessels,
aircraft, locomotives, and other non-road vehicles and engines; (2) greenhouse gas performance
standards for potentially dozens of industrial source categories; and, (3) national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) for greenhouse gases set below current atmospheric concentrations.
«Given the substantial lead time for the
standards, along with anticipated fuel efficiency gains for new
aircraft types already in development by manufacturers, the
standards will serve primarily to prevent backsliding in
emissions,» ICCT said in a statement.