Sentences with phrase «al. consensus paper»

His post discusses Andrew Neil's interview with Ed Davey, Dana's response, and also discusses the Cook et al. consensus paper.

On Wednesday, I'll be presenting results from my PhD research into the psychology of consensus, and I may happen to mention the Cook et al. consensus paper along the way.

Not exact matches

You might think that after all of the harsh criticism that the 2013 Cook et al. paper (C13) has received from climate contrarians that we would be pleased to embrace the results of a critique that claims we were far too conservative in assessing the consensus.

So Cook et al. arbitrarily excluded all 7930 papers that expressed no opinion either way, and — hey presto — 97.1 % consensus.

I then obtained and read all 64 abstracts, and found that only 43 of them explicitly endorsed the consensus as Cook et al. had defined it in the introduction to their paper: that more than half of the global warming since 1950 was anthropogenic.

If Cook et al. are now saying that many papers do not make a definite statement because it is obvious that most of global warming is human - made, I am inclined to agree with this assumption, not least because of other research referenced on this page showing a similar degree of consensus.

The Skeptical Science team published several high - impact papers this year, starting with the Cook et al. (2013) consensus paper, co-authored by nine Skeptical Science volunteers.

From van der Sluijs et al. paper «Beyond consensus: reflections from a democratic perspective on the interaction between climate politics and science:»

Furthermore, Aanthanur displays unawareness that the Cook et al. 2013 paper provides a double validation of the 97 % consensus (authors gave a self - rating of their own papers — and the self - ratings verified the 97 %).

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley Three - quarters (rounded up to 97.1 %) of all commenters expressing an opinion on my recent post about Dana Nuccitelli's attempt at ex-post-facto justification of the false assertion in the lamentable Cook et al. paper of a non-existent 97.1 % «scientific consensus» that turned out on peer - reviewed inspection to be 0.3 %, enjoyed the...

This has been discussed in IPCC and NRC which represent the «consensus view» much more broadly than Mann et al. or any other individual paper (whether Mann's conclusions are «correct» or not was not my focus).

The paper, Cook et al. (2013)» Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature» searched...

Surveying papers published 1991 - 2011, Cook et al. (2013) found only 3 % rejected the consensus.