Sentences with phrase «alarmism at»

Michael Mann is the creator of the iconic global - warming «hockey stick», the single most influential image in the campaign to sell Big Climate alarmism at the turn of the century.

So despite a roller coaster ride all year and several very close calls, the US as a whole appears to have escaped the devastating impact from climate alarmism at least for the next four years and possibly for eight years.

Whatever happens in the next 10 to 20 years, we are assured it will be a lot less than what the projections were 10 years ago when alarmism at its peak.

Interesting that I so often read this kind of alarmism at «skeptical» climate blogs, but never see an evidence - based approach to quantifying this supposed loss of freedom.

(That last note is primarily for those who only tend to see alarmism at one end of the spectrum.)

Not exact matches

Chris Sutherland has talked up Western Australia's economic prospects, while challenging alarmism about artificial intelligence and labour casualisation at a Business News Success & Leadership breakfast this morning.

In an interesting paper that appeared in the journal Global Environmental Change, a group of scholars, including Naomi Oreskes, a historian of science at Harvard, and Michael Oppenheimer, a geoscientist at Princeton, note that so - called climate skeptics frequently accuse climate scientists of «alarmism» and «overreacting to evidence of human impacts on the climate system.»

Representing TRCS, Doiron has presented at University of Louisiana - Lafayette, where he promoted the idea that climate alarmism is causing «irrational energy - related decisions.»

I started here by commenting that the alarmism from media, activists, politicians and the like was making the job difficult to at times impossible.

I find it interesting that at that time the projections were for more warming than later iterations of the IPPC... but the alarmism during the same period has increased.

At first it was unclear to me what Hans meant (in 29) by saying «I have seen some good work by you against climate alarmism on this site».

My argument here is that if alarmism works at a broad level (climate research funding for global warming) for getting funds, it should also work at the finer scale (within climate research).

If there were well - funded extremist alarmism as much as there is well - funded extremist denial, perhaps the public would be as confused as now, but at least the press would get the middle in the right place.

This wasn't the way the case looked back at the beginning of the year when the climate alarmism industry was gleefully predicting that this case would put National Review out of business.

Still, even though the costly climate - alarmism schemes will not be entirely abolished, Abbott and his coalition appear determined to scrap the carbon tax at least.

True, true, using the analogy of a greenhouse with respect to global warming alarmism is not objective at all.

The skeptics here at WUWT (myself included) often hammer the dishonest alarmists over their willful ignoring of thermometer measurement precision in temperature records who then try and proclaim «highest - ever» alarmism, when the differences are being proclaimed to hundredths of a degree.

Ebell, who leads the Center for Energy and Environment at the right - leaning Competitive Enterprise Institute, has warned against climate «alarmism» and called the agency's Clean Power Plan, issued in August 2015, «illegal.»

«I consider environmentalism and its currently strongest version — climate alarmism — to be, at the beginning of the 21st century, the most effective and, therefore, the most dangerous vehicle for advocating, drafting and implementing large scale government intervention and for an unprecedented suppression of human freedom,» he added.

(Betts has been very active at Bishop Hill recently, engaging with sceptics, and promising to dissociate himself and his colleagues from alarmism).

Although it's 5 months old now, «New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism» at http://tinyurl.com/455s55h makes interesting reading.

-LSB-...] in atmospheric temps over the past 15 - 17 years, the latest bluff in climate alarmism is that the «missing heat» is hiding at the bottom of the oceans.

THEIR latest report couched in pseudo-science and alarmism claims that Australia's $ 40 billion tourism industry is at risk thanks to your sinful existence...

Since his 1988 testimony before Congress, Hansen has been at the forefront of global warming alarmism, spending much of his time making controversial statements — many of which later required further explanations, clarifications, or apologies.

Your overture comes at a time when the science backing global warming alarmism is crumbling, as amply demonstrated by the reports of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate change (NIPCC).

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) might have played this important role, but its leadership was quickly captured by political operatives, determined to support climate alarmism, even when this was at odds with the findings of honest scientists who wrote technical parts of IPCC reports.

In my opinion, the Forces At Play is Entropy, Sophism, Pragmatism, and Alarmism.

The craziest thing is, at the heart of global warming alarmism, is the Left's fear of humanity.

They seem to suffer from unquenchable and mystical faith in alarmism and leave their everyday experience, common sense and basic scientific knowledge at the door.

statements along with the scientific observations show that the IPCC is not off the mark (at least towards alarmism) due to any political biasing.

Denialism's Alarmism's predetermined conclusions are, of course, utterly at odds with scientific rationality... and this is why Climate Etc committed denialists alarmists are implacably hostile to all forms of science.

Why would you not add to the cost of what filing cabinets of global warming alarmism pseudo-science, all of the dollars that are funneled to the Mideast and folks like Hugo and all of the foregone oppoutunities here at home, not to mention the damage to the culture and the toll it has taken on scientific integrity?

That would be Karl Bohnak, chief meteorologist at WLUC - TV on Michigan's Upper Peninsula, who calls global warming alarmism his «pet peeve» and finally got so fed up with it that he wrote to his congressman, Democrat Rep. Bart Stupak.

The cosequences of large tempature increases are discussed rationaly and without alarmism, but sceptics» contention that the predictions for large tempature increases can not be justified was not even hinted at much less discussed.

To review: At first sight, Pope's article appears to be a refreshing call for intellectual honesty from the consensus climate - science camp: «Hey, why don't we try telling the public the truth, for a change, instead of all this exaggerated alarmism?»

Alexander Wendt at www.achgut.com/ch, a policy - critical site run by leading German publicists, wrote how Hans - Joachim Schellnhuber recently boasted before journalists of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) how he got Pope Francis to swing over to climate alarmism in His most recent encyclical «Laudato Si».

Last fall I alerted Spectator readers to the start - up nonprofit Alliance for Climate Education, which spreads the global warming alarmism gospel to students one school assembly at a time.

Someone like Myron Ebell, an analyst at CEI, freely admits that, as an advocate in a politicized battle, he tries to make «the best case against alarmism.»

Arthur Robinson and Roy Spencer to be recognized at upcoming conference in Las Vegas for speaking out against global warming «alarmism»

Despite the evidence of the public's growing dismissal of alarmism, and the indisputable empirical evidence that the IPCC «climate experts» and their models have been abysmally wrong for a very long time, along comes a «scientist» like Myles Allen, confirming for all that scientific honesty is now at a low point convincingly within the Twilight Zone.

Professor Dyson — born in Britain 87 years ago, a scholar at Winchester but a naturalised American, now based at Princeton university is not altogether convinced that the Indie's alarmism has any factual basis whatsoever.

But what you even at this late stage apparently still haven't worked out, is that it doesn't take a conspiracy for an organisation to pursue its own self interest — eg the state promoting alarmism about climate, or tobacco companies promoting complacency about smoking.

Should McIntyre ever decide to seek employment with the NY Times or suckle at the climate alarmism teat, he will surely find it difficult at best thanks to Mann's slander.

Compiled by Dr Ole Humlum, Professor of Physical Geography at the University Centre in Svalbard (Norway), the new climate survey is in sharp contrast to the habitual alarmism of other reports that are mainly based on computer modelling and climate predictions.

So his first reaction to the piece was a shot across the bows not at Pielke but at Nate Silver, denouncing his new venture as «yet another outlet for misinformation» - which is Mann's term for anything that dissents even mildly from the ayatollahs of alarmism.

The «hiatus» at 15 years is now nearly as long as the 18 years of warming that triggered global - warming alarmism.

If it had been done, all the subsequent hollering and alarmism would have been laughed at.

In contrast, Shell and BP «paid lip service» to global warming alarmism and reportedly funded Greenpeace to support a damaging embargo «at the pumps» against Exxon in Europe.

The truth about Judith Curry, as I see it, is that she has a strong attraction for political dialogue, and refuses to see that the public debate over climate is fundamentally at odds with good science, as is the IPCC - sponsored «consensus» of climate alarmism, or in her case, of climate political - worryism (she seems deeply attached to helping bring about «reasonable» and «responsible» climate policies — whereas my view is that any and all such climate policies, now, are necessarily based upon incompetent, false science, are entirely the wrong thing to try to impose upon the people of the world, and need to be summarily thrown out, before one can even begin to have a dispassionate, competent scientific dialogue — as opposed to the political debate now being served up — on the state of climate science.).

Horizon's mawkish treatment of the idea of global dimming did nothing to inform the public; its intention was to provoke sensation — not understanding — at the hight of climate change alarmism.