For decades, the mainstream journalists have dutifully reported hysterical
alarmism generated by a minority of scientists dedicated to the concept of human CO2 - caused catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW)... this style of sensationalist, tabloid «climate science» journalism however is dependent on either a condition of stuck - on - stupid mentality or a highly biased, politically motivated political agenda, not on scientific empirical evidence
As we also point out, the political response to global warming
alarmism generated by the environmental movement has not been based on scientific understanding, but precaution.
But just like Communism,
alarmism generates numerous local conspiracies.»
SINCE then, the Climate Council has maintained its position as Australia's premier
alarmism generating machine.
Not exact matches
Climate
alarmism is not based on empirical observation; rather, it is entirely predicated on computer models that are manipulated to
generate predictions of significant global warming as a result of increased concentrations of CO2.
When asked to build a model that
generates explanatory or predictive ability, they don't, instead appealing to rhetoric or strawman attacks about CAGW
alarmism.
The theory that Exxon
generates the academic research that contests climate
alarmism is one of those tired cliches that appeals to stupid, lazy people who can't be bothered reading the papers and understanding the arguments.»
In addition to being nothing but a hoax and a scare tactic, global warming
alarmism really is just another Leftist «product» that is ginned - up out of whole cloth to
generate «revenue» isn't it?