Sentences with phrase «alarmism which»

The plateau of global temperatures over the past two decades — «the pause» — is disproportionate to the increase in climate alarmism which coincides with the rise of mobile / video phones and CCTV, with extreme weather content captured and uploaded to social media, and lovingly aired by CAGW - sympathetic mainstream media, leading to the mass climate hysteria we bear witness to daily.

But please be careful with alarmism which is likely to be detrimental to your credibility in the long run.

In a timely manner, the Center's Science Watch Team alerts policy makers, the media, and the public to unreliable scientific claims and unjustified alarmism which often lead to public harm.

Not exact matches

For some time now many scientists, even and perhaps especially those connected to the climate alarmism movement, have worried about the exaggerations and downright apocalyptic scenarios which have come out of the writings of some of their scientific colleagues like James Hansen or James Lovelock,....

They'll know right away which claims are vulnerable to accusations of «alarmism,» they'll understand which bits journalists are likely to latch on to, and they'll certainly know when a PR needs a little more «sex appeal.»

My comment was directed toward leaving even traces of alarmism out of AGW communications so that only the science can be attacked, which is much harder to do than attacking language.

Perhaps the Trenberth Press Conference in which the connection of hurricane frequency and intensity to GW was affirmed is an example of «alarmism».

The trouble is that such a crusading entity is unlikely to be one which is tainted by alarmism itself as they would have too much to lose, or be so politically extreme as to lack credibility with most of the public.

If even Eric Steig is dubious it seems like pure alarmism from the new study which in any case only talked about a one inch rise over many decades.

As the United Nations defends a scheme to rob the industrialized world of $ 2 trillion a year to fund its redistributionists aims, the latest scientific evidence continues to undermine the fundamental premises on which the edifice of global warming alarmism has been standing.

I have long ago concluded that while climate alarmism will not help the planet, it has seriously corrupted science and created a mountain of debt for which no - one can prove any benefit — except to the alternative energy people and such, of course.

The main justifications offered for climate alarmism are expensive general circulation models, which cost taxpayers many billions of dollars but prove nothing except that garbage in results in garbage out.

TE, I think much of the public generally gets the politics behind AGW, which is why alarmism in the press gets ever more «ridiculous».

Even authoritarian states like Russia and China have generally agreed with global warming alarmism... despite making no real improvements in decarbonization... which is somewhat astounding given their anti-western bias.

There is not necessarily correlation between them, obviously, and Warmists tend to jump from alarmism about one, to predictions of doom about another, depending on which particular straw man suits their current situation.

For example, understanding that global warming is not a proven science and that there is no circumstantial evidence for global warming alarmism — which is why we see goats like political charlatans like Al Gore showing debunked graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks — and, not understanding that climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing and that the climate change we observed can be explained by natural causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that and the fact that global warming alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor most of the principles upon which the country was founded.

In the run up to Al Gore's televised 24 hour climate alarmism extravaganza, he penned an article for Rolling Stone in which he sought to discredit those scientists who dissent from the claimed «consensus» on climate change.

Since his 1988 testimony before Congress, Hansen has been at the forefront of global warming alarmism, spending much of his time making controversial statements — many of which later required further explanations, clarifications, or apologies.

They might well use the EF to attempt a disastrous backdoor takeover of the US economy by EPA in the name of climate alarmism, which may have been Obama's intent.

The CPI website's Climate Change Lobby page contains only hostile attacks on climate realists — such as the libertarian Heartland Institute and the Competitive Enterprise Institute — which question Obama's climate - alarmism orthodoxy.

Clearly, the computer climate models on which climate alarmism is based are flawed because they fail to model these natural processes correctly.

I guess Fitzpatrick hit a nerve when he alluded to dedicated apologizers of global warming alarmism may be showing the The Dunning — Kruger effect... a cognitive bias in which unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than average.

Better than most works on the subject, which tend to assume too much knowledge on the part of the reader, Steele's very readable book makes clear the workings of natural weather and climate processes, in turn making clear the extent to which global warming alarmism is based on opportunistic hype and the relentless pursuit of a political — not a scientific — agenda.

So the only logical position for Gavin to lobby his alarmism to Congress is the Know Nothing Party stance, whereby he states he knows nothing, which gets him to the Big Table.

The motivation for this alarmism is to encourage action, which is not unreasonable in itself, but action from fear can lead to ill considered decisions.

So far what we've seen from the «Good» guys has been a collection of vicious threats and criminal attacks — Gleick's identity theft of documents from Heartland (which the AGU apparently endorses), and various threats to imprison or execute people who disagree with alarmism.

What we see with I term GWA (Global Warming Alarmism — as opposed to simple AGW or Anthropogenic Global Warming) is not simply an argument of science, but a complete cannon of belief and doctine which rivals the world religion.

What we see with I term GWA (Global Warming Alarmism — as opposed to simple AGW or Anthropogenic Global Warming) is not simply an argument of science, but a complete canon of belief and doctine which rivals the world religion.

California is proceeding down this absurd emissions reduction path while the «science» supposedly supporting climate alarmism claims is crumbling with global climate models shown to be flawed and failed by climate scientist testimony before Congress and UN IPCC acknowledgements of the undeniable truth that it is impossible to create credible global climate models which, in fact, has been the case for the last 25 years.

He begins with a sciency statement, which is a common opening move in the game of climate alarmism.

After his hashtag debacle of last week, Mann was doubtless grateful to be back in the insulated climate cocoon in which the only questions that slip through the net are from sappy rubes who support climate alarmism so they can feel like they're «saving the planet» without actually having to lift a finger.

And government has such a big vested interest in alarmism, which is why unswerving alarmism is unsurprisingly the majority view.

He's also the co-author of Pope Francis's Encyclical which recently gave voice to the Church of Climate Alarmism.

«During the past year, the American people have been served up an unprecedented parade of environmental alarmism by the media and entertainment industry, which links every possible weather event to global warming.

An «alarmism» which has become self defeating.

Last fall I alerted Spectator readers to the start - up nonprofit Alliance for Climate Education, which spreads the global warming alarmism gospel to students one school assembly at a time.

For example, IPCC scientists tend to under - estimate the impacts of climate change, which runs contrary to the charge of alarmism:

-- All of which, though, is way off the original topic, which is that government — funds (and hence controls) climate science — as a huge vested interest in climate science preaching alarmism (CAGW).

Music to ears those with totalitarian / left leanings of course, and which is of course the primary driving force in promoting alarmism.

Another mainstay of the climate change alarmism movement is that glaciers are melting, sea levels are rising, and the oceans are acidifying, which will disrupt ocean life and the food chain.

The reality of the rift developing between greens, however, is not one in which dogma is replaced by «evidence» or «science, as Monbiot and Lynas claim, but by another dogma — climate alarmism, the logic of which now unsettles the grounds it emerged from.

In 1992, he ran two congressional hearings during which he tried to bully dissenting scientists, including myself, into changing our views and supporting his climate alarmism.

The basic postulate of IPCC climate alarmism is the relation dQ = 4 dT connecting radiative forcing dQ to global warming dT, with dQ = 4 Watts / m ^ 2 from doubling of CO2 giving a climate sensitivity or global warming of dT = 1 C, which is inflated to 1.5 — 4.5 C by feed back.

I think it's a sarcastic joke (about alarmism) which you are unable to get.

Meanwhile, the unfortunate (for you) implication of forcing people to take sides in a polarised debate by raising the opinions of Bastardi, Hannity, and Inhoffe in a discussion about alarmism, is that you force people to make a choice between self - evidently mad alarmism and a position which is closer to reality.

So his first reaction to the piece was a shot across the bows not at Pielke but at Nate Silver, denouncing his new venture as «yet another outlet for misinformation» - which is Mann's term for anything that dissents even mildly from the ayatollahs of alarmism.

Johnny's emotions characterise the shrill, impatient, self importance of the environmental movement, which prefers trantrums to debate, and panic and alarmism to convincing arguments.

Which is why he has also had to escalate the alarmism.

The scientific basis for the entire global warming alarmism is an hypothesis that the increase of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere from the burning of fossil fuels and other human activities is producing a greatly increased greenhouse effect through a process called «radiative forcing» in - which the CO2 greatly magnifies the greenhouse warming of the water vapor.

By Paul Chesser Last fall I alerted Spectator readers to the start - up nonprofit Alliance for Climate Education, which spreads the global warming alarmism gospel to students one school assembly at a time.