Not exact matches
Despite the «science is settled» and «consensus»
claims of the
global -
warming alarmists, the fear of catastrophic consequences from rising temperatures has been driven not so much by good science as by computer models and adroit publicity fed to a compliant media.
The
Global Warming Policy Foundation is an independent think tank chaired by the former British finance minister Nigel Lawson that
claims to «bring reason, integrity and balance to a debate that has become seriously unbalanced, irrationally
alarmist and all too often depressingly intolerant ``.
However keen you may be to demonstrate my arguments are misleading, I am afraid to report I am simply a scientist who feels stongly about protecting our natural environment, and who agrees
global warming is a potential risk, but yet who remains unconvinced by the generally
alarmist claims that the end of the world is nigh.
The relationship is not perfect but it represents a significant improvement over the incredibly lame human - CO2 and
global warming / climate change relationship
claimed by the IPCC's anti-CO2 Climategate scientists and
alarmists.
The 47,000 wildfires last year may seem like a very large number — and it certainly gives
global warming alarmists like Brown plenty of fodder for misleading
global warming claims — but the 47,000 wildfires was less than half the average number of wildfires that occurred each year in the 1960s and 1970s.
Even though President Obama and other
global -
warming alarmists warn of a looming climate apocalypse, they avoid giving a metric to prove their
claims.
In other words, «Forecast the Facts» was originally conceived as a front group controlled by far - left advocacy groups to hide behind while attacking meteorologists, who surveys show tend to be very skeptical of the
claims of
global warming alarmists.
The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change has been vigorously attacked by some environmentalists and
global warming alarmists who view it as a threat to their
claim of a «consensus» in favor of their extreme views.
James Taylor of the Heartland Institute penned a Forbes article where he
claimed that Christy's findings «refute frequent assertions by
global warming alarmists that
global warming is adversely affecting Sierra Nevada snowfall and snowpack.»
As a result,
global warming alarmists get a pass on
claiming to be helping the poor by fighting
global warming.
Should scientific skeptics of AGW be required prove the negative of all of the
claims of
global warming alarmists?
Global warming alarmists claim that such incidences have nothing to do with a climate trend.
The man - made
global warming narrative remained intact in the media in spite of various IPCC's
alarmist claims being proven as false.
Many climate
alarmists claim 97 percent or more climate scientists state carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels is causing
global warming.
From New Zealand comes another example of climate
alarmists «adjusting» temperatures upward to
claim global warming that isn't, in fact, occurring, as shown by Joanne Nova «s excellent blog.
Global warming alarmists claim that extreme climate change is producing an increased frequency of severe weather events - new EU research proves that
claim to be false
Hysterical
global warming alarmists keep
claiming that polar sea ice melt is due to increasing human CO2 emissions.
««
Alarmist»
Global Warming Claims Unfounded Says Climatolgist,» CNSNews.com, July 14, 2003.
Like many other conference speakers and attendees, Secretary - General Ban cited the recent droughts, floods, and Tropical Storm Sandy as proof of the dire consequences of man - made
global warming, even though many studies and scientists (including scientists who usually fall into the climate
alarmist category) have stated that there is no evidence to support
claims that «extreme weather» has been increasing in frequency and / or magnitude in recent years, or that extreme events (hurricanes, droughts, heat waves, etc.) have anything to do with increased CO2 levels.
That is the Null Hypothesis, which must be falsified in order to make the
alarmists»
claims of man - made
global warming credible.
Yes, and it's also the actual
claim global warming alarmists are making.
In November, 2015, the three lead NIPCC authors — Craig Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer — wrote a small book titled Why Scientists Disagree About
Global Warming: The NIPCC Report on Scientific Consensus revealing how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most important scientific issues in the climate change debate, and how most scientists do not support the
alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Global warming alarmists claimed Arctic ice cap would be gone by now, but sea ice is 5 % above 35 year average
Climate
alarmists claim the rises in OHC, SST and TLT anomaly data are overwhelming proof of anthropogenic
global warming.
WARMING alarmists rebut the 1970's
global cooling scare with
claims that the phenomenon wasn't «peer - reviewed» or that a «consensus» of «97 %» of «scientists» didn't agree.
What other
alarmist predictions, exaggerated
claims and catastrophic projections are you fed in order to push the
global warming agenda?
The video that Steven Mosher links to, mentions the movie The Great
Global Warming Swindle, which was debunking the
alarmist claim that CO2 was a climate DRIVER.
RussiaGate — Even when
global warming alarmists base
claims on scientific measurements, they've often had their finger on the scale.
The NOAA temperature data are driving a stake through the heart of
alarmists claiming accelerating
global warming.
Global warming «skeptics» — scientists and others who question whether the scientific debate is truly settled and ask for real data to support the
claims of the
alarmists — are frequently attacked in the press, by politicians (including President Barack Obama), and on countless blogs and Web sites.
Thus, environmental
alarmists have made much of research
claiming the Arctic's great white bear faces extinction from human - caused
global warming.
I think they are a disinformation campaign because he
claims to hate the
Global Warming alarmists but recently admitted he doesn't believe weather warfare is even possible.
Then thereâ $ ™ s the pesky issue of â $ œconsensus.â $
Alarmists typically counter any fact - based
global warming argument with the assertion that the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has already ruled on the issue, and therefore â $ œthe science is settledâ $ and â $ œthe debate is over.â $ â $ œMild winter temperatures will decrease heavy snowstorms, â $ IPCC
claimed in its 2001 Third Assessment.
Climate
alarmists claim a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide will produce catastrophic
global warming.
Because the endless
alarmist predictions
claimed that rising CO2 would result in runaway
global warming.
That, the UN official
claimed, is «very detrimental» to the fight against alleged
global warming, which even
alarmists have now been forced to admit has been on «pause» for 17 years in defiance of all 73 UN «climate» models.
Ever since the 2011 CLOUD experiment at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN),
alarmists have tried to denigrate the results,
claiming it's a myth that cosmic rays can affect
global warming.
Echoing the comments of top administration officials, Chinese communists, UN climate
alarmists, and globalist billionaires obsessed with reducing the human population, Gore
claimed late last month that «fertility management» that is «ubiquitously available» was crucial to stopping alleged
global warming.
But nothing like the catastrophe we have been led to believe, with many
alarmists claiming there would be an ice - free arctic last summer due to
global warming (in fact, much of the big decline in 2007 was due to changes in wind patterns, not temperature).
Federal Judge Dismisses
Claim Of «Big - Oil» Conspiracy To Suppress
Global Warming Science In a rare event, sanity prevails in California — Climate skeptics rule,
alarmists drool.
«with many
alarmists claiming there would be an ice - free arctic last summer due to
global warming»