Only somebody as blind and deluded as you wouldn't be able to see that Nature has not paid ball with any of
the alarmist model predictions.
Not exact matches
John S. Theon, formerly chief of all weather and climate research for NASA, and James Hansen's former boss, has just released a statement of his personal skepticism concerning the
predictions of climate
alarmist James Hansen and of climate
models.
This will mean relying on discredited, worthless
alarmist models that routinely spew out
predictions unrelated to reality.
According to climate
alarmists, the frequency and severity of this natural hazard should already be increasing in response to
model - based
predictions of CO2 - induced global warming.
The bad news is that as more is understood about global warming, and as we compare what has happened to what was predicted by the average
models (from the actual science, not from popular sensationalized media), the earlier scientific
predictions have turned out to be too conservative, not as you say «too
alarmist».
I do not expect any extant
model to survive the next 20 years» worth of data collection, but I think that the data collected to date do not clearly rule out very much — though
alarmist predictions made in 1988 - 1990 look less credible year by year.
Are all of the
alarmist warmistas in a world - at - risk tizzy over projections of catastrophe by computer
models, or are they engaged in making
predictions of impending doom, based on
models and all manner of other misinterpreted evidence and made up nonsense?
The simple, indisputable, scientific summary after 35 years of empirical evidence: The tropical, runaway hotspot did not happen in spite of massive amounts of CO2 emissions released into the atmosphere; ergo, the IPCC was wrong, again; the billion - dollar climate
model predictions were wrong, again;
alarmist, agenda - driven scientists» claims of climate doomsday were wrong, again; and, the fanatical anti-CO2 green lobby was wrong, as always.
«Even Climate
Alarmist Models Reveal An 80 % CO2 Cut Abysmally Ineffective: By 2050, Warming Reduced By 0.05 °C; Sea Rise Reduced by 0.1» Main Climate
Models: Why Do They Have Such A Terrible
Prediction Record?
And which groups of people really like to embrace the doomsday
alarmist predictions from climate
models?