Sentences with phrase «alarmist position on»

The National Center for Science Education has adopted as part of its mission the task of attacking researchers and commentators who question the biased and alarmist position on global warming staked out by the Obama administration and environmental advocacy groups, so Steven Newton's highly critical essay comes as no surprise.

«Since its creation in 2006 the site has done nothing but post poorly researched propaganda with a clear intent to smear respected scientists, policy analysts or groups who dare oppose an alarmist position on global warming.

Purposes of the messages will be to challenge the alarmist position on atmospheric warming, educate the public on actual climate behaviour and force supporters the likes of Al Gore into an open debate.

Under pressure from a dissident group of Fellows, the Royal Society moved to meaningfully moderate its former radically alarmist position on global warming.

Not exact matches

BTW — as predicted by some comments in this post: several outlets in the media are taking alarmist positions (not grounded in fact) on the change in Atlantic circulation.

Even if we suppose that all their scientific staff signed on to the alarmist position, is the board obliged to take their conclusions as gospel?!

Of course, the corporation's new policy on who is allowed to appear opposite scientists only applies to when the scientist is not criticical of alarmist positions, so they could have picked anyone they want to face off with Judy.

I think a simple realization by some that there is a spectrum of psychological types related to the issue of AGW, and that at the extreme ends we have «alarmists» on one end and «deniers» on the other which are more similar to each other psychologically because they are emotionally attached to the issue or ideologically attached and 100 % are certain of their position.

Whatever one's position on the science, it's is indisputable that by now there are plentiful inducements for scientists to maintain an alarmist bias.

I've come to the conclusion that the paper acts as an excellent carrot, which when combined with the terrible example of Mann's floundering to defend the indefensible (as the stick) may tempt some people to row back from some silly alarmist positions they've taken on global warming.

The flaws in the alarmist position Lindzen exposed in 1992 remain the same today: the global warming scare story depends on hopelessly inadequate computer models which place too much emphasis on man - made CO2 and which therefore produce a «disturbingly arbitrary» picture of the state of climate.

Mosher has long ago decided his position on AGW which is more alarmist than lukewarm and has been for the last few years using drive - by comments to poison the well of every discussion here that he feels threatens his belief.

Exxon opposed global warming alarmist falsehoods on scientific grounds when Lee Raymond was CEO, and I respected that position because it showed integrity..

Moreover, I have had many arguments with people of an alarmist bent in which it has become obvious that they are keener on a society organised around the authority of climate science than they are keen on understanding precisely what climate science has determined, which is to say that such a position is nakedly «ideological», yet owes very little of its understanding to science.

I think we can accept that peoples political position influences their views on AGW, there seems to be a high correlation between conservative politics and having a denialist perspective, and also between liberal politics and having an alarmist perspective, but why?

Keep pushing, Steve, Jeff and all — Shining light on each of the incomplete, erroneous, obfuscatory or misleading cornerstones supporting the alarmist positions has brought tremendous clarity to the entire issue, including the part having socio - political content.

snip you would find out that the mainstream position is not that the impact of CO2 is zero, just that it is less than the alarmists claim, and reducing, on account of it is logarithmic.