Sentences with phrase «alarmist predictions of»

The one - third increase in an extremely tin trace gas has had beneficial effects on the biosphere, while there is no empirical evidence to believe in the alarmist predictions of doom based entirely on a high climate sensitivity to CO2.

«The ongoing 18 years without any warming strongly contradict alarmist predictions of global warming doom - and - gloom.

This peer - reviewed study - from experts not associated with an activist agenda group (s)- determined that the alarmist predictions of dramatic increases of California sea levels «hold no water».

The alarmist predictions of global warming to me appear very similar to the predictions of peak oil.

But it will not support the alarmist predictions of global temperature rises by the end of the century of up to 9 degrees Fahrenheit.

Of course, this led to dramatically alarmist predictions of temperature under a «business as usual» scenario.

For Tacoli (2009) the current alarmist predictions of massive flows of so - called «environmental refugees» or «environmental migrants», are not supported by past experiences of responses to droughts and extreme weather events and predictions for future migration flows are tentative at best.

Of course, alarmist predictions of economic doom are two - a-penny.

Not exact matches

The alarmist prediction that cheap available drugs could lead to an addiction rate of 75 percent of regular users simply ignores the fact that 35 to 40 million Americans are already using some drugs and that only 3 percent become addicts.

(I don't want to make alarmist predictions, but she really needs to get this fixed before he starts holding in his pee and poop because he's afraid of the feeling.

Rudolf Kipp of the Science Skeptical site has a post on the latest climate predictions of Hans - Joachim Schellnhuber, the Director of the alarmist Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK).

I was deliberately looking backward at some of Gore's patently alarmist predictions to expose them for the unscientific nonsense they were — and are.

that looks bad, the alarmists refuse public debate... that looks bad, the alarmists predictions are routinely failures... that looks bad, the alarmists use their influence to deny publication of contrary science... that looks bad, the alarmists do whatever they can to destroy the careers of scientists that research alternate explanations for climatic temp changes..

The IPCC predictions are serious enough without some of the alarmist tendencies to overstate things about runaway greenhouse effect or oceans rising multiple feet.

... The global warming alarmists could not pursist without their endless use of fear, scare and dire predictions; most of which are based on faulty computer programs.

Climate alarmists are alarmed, scaremongers scared, for their predictions of catastrophe are not coming true.

John S. Theon, formerly chief of all weather and climate research for NASA, and James Hansen's former boss, has just released a statement of his personal skepticism concerning the predictions of climate alarmist James Hansen and of climate models.

Contrary to alarmist predictions, there have been no outbreaks of malaria or other climate - related diseases on the African subcontinent that could be attributed to global warming.

According to the dubious theories and predictions advanced by Al Gore and other alarmists, though, none of this should be happening.

Alarmists used their predictions of climate catastrophe to demand that the world transform its energy and economic systems, slash fossil fuel use, and accept lower living standards, in response to the politically manufactured science.

Sure it's a short time period, but nothing in any alarmist prediction or IPCC report hinted that there was any possibility that for even so short a time as 15 years warming might cease (at least not in the last IPCC report, which I have read nearly every page of).

«I was one of those scientists — and of course bore my share of ridicule for daring to make such an alarmist prediction.»

Only somebody as blind and deluded as you wouldn't be able to see that Nature has not paid ball with any of the alarmist model predictions.

Visually, it is clear that modern CO2 growth has affected temperatures contrary to the predictions of the IPCC and AGW alarmists.

According to climate alarmists, the frequency and severity of this natural hazard should already be increasing in response to model - based predictions of CO2 - induced global warming.

Are any of the dire predictions of AGW alarmists coming even close?

I do not expect any extant model to survive the next 20 years» worth of data collection, but I think that the data collected to date do not clearly rule out very much — though alarmist predictions made in 1988 - 1990 look less credible year by year.

Are all of the alarmist warmistas in a world - at - risk tizzy over projections of catastrophe by computer models, or are they engaged in making predictions of impending doom, based on models and all manner of other misinterpreted evidence and made up nonsense?

He is one who celebrates when the recent climate data show the alarmist's predictions of catastrophic warming might be wrong.

For example, it is impossible for skeptics and alarmists to come together so long as alarmists pretend — as you do, Fred, in this very essay — that recent weather trends in one part of the world lend proof to their theories and predictions.

While perhaps failing to observe the irony of its own reporting, the Times juxtaposed the thoroughly discredited population explosion theories of the 1970s with the (equally alarmist) global warming predictions of our day.

Moreover, rational people must accept that even if America commits economic suicide and Western civilization descends into feckless nihilism, the global warming alarmists» predictions of doomsday will not change anything.

The litany of failed, alarmist predictions is why scientific organisations, such as the BoM, have — tragically — become almost the last places to hear the truth about global warming climate change.

If there is no discernible relationship between CO2 and temperatures, this suggests why alarmists do not do this kind of basic analysis themselves and instead Rely just on junk predictions.

Despite these trivial sea level rise over the past century and a bit, moonbat councils on the east coast of Australia are still tying up waterfront properties in miles of green tape, justified by predictions of massive sea level rises by climate alarmists, and property values have plummeted as a result:

This claim underlies all the rest of the alarmist predictions / warnings that the paper was apparently written to promote.

As can be seen, the satellite empirical evidence after 30 + years does not readily support the climate - alarmist AGW theory, nor the doomsday predictions of global warming hell.

Republican Lamar Smith, chairman of the committee, opened the hearing by saying «alarmist predictions amount to nothing more than wild guesses» and that «much of climate science today seems to be based more on exaggerations, personal agendas and questionable predictions than on the scientific methods.»

The simple, indisputable, scientific summary after 35 years of empirical evidence: The tropical, runaway hotspot did not happen in spite of massive amounts of CO2 emissions released into the atmosphere; ergo, the IPCC was wrong, again; the billion - dollar climate model predictions were wrong, again; alarmist, agenda - driven scientists» claims of climate doomsday were wrong, again; and, the fanatical anti-CO2 green lobby was wrong, as always.

The predictions of alarmist scientists are frequently hysterical, and most often wrong, as was globally witnessed with the Hurricane Irene forecasts.

They are certainly the only factors that climate activists and alarmists want to talk about, and use to generate scary «scenarios» that are presented as actual predictions of future calamities — while they attempt to silence debate, criticism and skepticism.

While alarmists predict total loss of ice by 2030 (and earlier predictions have already failed), believers in the power of natural cycles expect Arctic sea ice to rebound by 2030.

After a series of embarrassing predictions and wild factual errors damaged global - warming alarmists» credibility — possibly beyond repair — the United Nations is again warning of impending doom: localized floods and droughts caused by climate change theoretically linked to human activity.

In reality, many of the IPCC's 2007 predictions have been found to be overly conservative rather than alarmist.

The alarmists generally use 2100 as their standard reference year in marking an end point for their long - term GMT and sea level predictions; but of course, almost no one who is reading these predictions today will be alive in 2100.

Even Britain's Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, one of the leading sirens of the alarmist community, had to concede late last month that, when it recalculated global temperatures for the past decade using the latest data and techniques, the average over the past 10 years had risen just 0.07 degrees centigrade, less than half the 0.2 degrees they and the UN had previously claimed.

I suggest that our track record to date is infinitely superior to that of the global warming alarmists including the IPCC, who have been wrong in all their very - scary predictions.

«You can save yourselves a lot of time, and generally be correct, by simply assuming that EVERY SCARY PREDICTION the global warming alarmists express is FALSE.»

(Part of the How to Talk to a Climate Skeptic guide) Objection: Sea ice at the north pole recovered a whopping 9.4 percent from 2007 to 2008 despite the doom and gloom predictions of the alarmists.

«The cycle of alarmist predictions is now well established.