The system faces bankruptcy, but talk of reform always stirs up
alarmist scenarios in which seniors will be made to surrender some of their benefits.
Not exact matches
This is distinctly
alarmist... It is common ground that if indeed Greenland melted, it would release this amount of water, but only after, and over, millennia, so that the Armageddon
scenario he predicts, insofar as it suggests that sea level rises of 7 metres might occur
in the immediate future, is not
in line with the scientific consensus.
Since we (you, me, the IPCC) all are
in agreement as to the likelihood of the rate of (near) future temperature change, the real impetus
in your call for a wager should be geared towards calling out the
alarmists — those folks who entertain the idea that the IPCC extreme temperature change
scenarios are the most probable.
Paul D... As a part - time
alarmist I would answer that with a little bit of extrapolation added to some warnings of climate scientists I guess the worst case
scenario at least includes the total collapse of the WAIS, creating tsunamis at least all over the Pacific rim, the subsequent sea level rise of c. 7m will destroy most of the remaining harbours, communication centers near coasts, next up would be the melting of the collapsed ice
in the southern ocean altering the climate of the entire southern hemisphere, making it near - impossible to guess what areas are good for similar agriculture as before, leading to massive movements of people.
THE only place where such catastrophic
scenarios exist are
in the warped minds of
alarmist hysterics who occupy the climate controlled offices of NASA, NOAA, BoM, National Geographic and the New York Times et al..
In fact, there are far more documented instances of the AR4 being too conservative, rather than too
alarmist, on emissions
scenarios, sea level rise, and Arctic sea - ice melt.
Even if future industrial CO2 production does exceed even the upper limits
in the
alarmists» computer projections, that's by no means necessarily a disastrous
scenario.
Like Pinkers, Boisvert tries to factor
in what climate
alarmists ignore: the capability of human beings to react to changing
scenarios in remarkably ingenious ways.
You will be used to push Moore's view that America is the source of all evil
in the world, as well as the usual crazy
alarmist scenarios (runaway greenhouse, etc).
I find this particularly ironic, as the only thing that the Hard Fork was successful
in demonstrating was that the worst case
scenario that the hard fork
alarmists have been droning on about for more than a year was completely unfounded, and that two chains can exist without any fire and brimstone falling from the skies.