Sentences with phrase «alarmist scientists»
The phrase "alarmist scientists" refers to scientists who are excessively worried or overly concerned about potential dangers or problems. They often sound fearful or exaggerated in their warnings about certain issues. Full definition
Much to the surprise of alarmist scientists, global warming is weak at best.
notrickszone.com
Government officials have been as bad as or worse than alarmist scientists in attempting to suppress skeptical climate research and speech, and hiding their efforts from public view.
In some cases, the broadcast networks have failed to include such scientists for years, while including alarmist scientists within the past six months.
Yeah, I how do you crazy alarmist scientists create results like that top graph from the data below?
We've all heard from the climate alarmist scientists that global warming is «accelerating» but is it really?
Skeptics have long cited Doran's research to show that global warming is a flawed theory motivated by alarmist scientists more interested in scaring up huge research grants than in pursuing the evidence with honesty and integrity.
This empirical science published by NASA is undeniable, and most alarmist scientists accept, although grudgingly - the relationship between changes in atmospheric CO2 levels and changes in temperature are, at best, significantly lame weak.
And, why does e.g. nobody ask, why alarmist scientists like Rahmsdorf or Schnellnhuber are allowed to take money from insurance companies which will benefit from the extreme weather panic they propagate?
Now compound this massive propaganda failure by the anti-growth Democrats with this week's latest climate science news from the world's premier science journal and a leading global warming alarmist scientist: natural ocean oscillations are responsible for Earth's modern temperature changes, not human CO2.
«Are Climate Alarmist Scientists Guilty For Deaths of Millions?
(By the way, it is not at all unusual for mainstream alarmist scientists to use this same feedback formula as a useful though imperfect abstraction, for example in Gerard H. Roe and Marcia B. Baker, «Why Is Climate Sensitivity So Unpredictable?»
After every catastrophic natural weather event, yellow journalists like the Washington Post's Chris Mooney or APs Seth Bornstein, seek out CO2 alarmist scientists like Kevin Trenberth or Michael Mann, to make totally unsubstantiated pronouncements that the event was 50 % or so due to global warming.
-LSB-...] via Speak of the devil: Alarmist scientists issue call for scary scenarios at AGU conference «Green He....
Recently, the climate change myth that global warming is «accelerating» has been shattered by the near - zilch warming for the last 17 years - indeed, to the point where even climate change alarmist scientists are being forced to admit that «the pause» remains unexplained.
For example, from whence would this group of extreme alarmist scientists have derived their authority?
Speaking to Andrew Bolt on Sky News» The Bolt Report, Professor Ridd says you can't trust alarmist scientists who claim the Great Barrier Reef is dying, thanks to man - made warming.
They expect the public to continue to support energy - rationing policies that will cost tens or hundreds of trillions of dollars on the basis that this handful of alarmist scientists in England and the United States can be trusted.»
The climate models used by alarmist scientists to predict global warming are getting worse, not better; carbon dioxide does far more good than harm; and President Obama has backed the «wrong side» in the war on «climate change.»
Hillary Clinton (who was then Secretary of State) demanded an investigation into it; a group of alarmist scientists wrote to President Obama demanding he launch a RICO prosecution of Exxon; two supposedly major journalistic exposes were published at Inside Climate News and theLA Times, then eagerly endorsed in such publications as Scientific American and the Guardian.
My response is we are being told by Al Gore and James Hansen (NASA global warming alarmist scientist) that the problem is worse than the IPCC (United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) and the scientists feared.
«MSM - Caused Confusion: They Confuse «Global Warming» With «Climate Change» - As Top Climate Scientist Explains, They're Not The Same Main Are Climate Alarmist Scientists Guilty For Deaths of Millions?
While German politicians, alarmist scientists, activists, and media are staying super-glued stuck on stupid, i.e. remaining mired in the stupidity of dogmatism and closed - mindedness, the climate debate and controversy in Germany is, well, shall we say, heating the hell up.Mark the following time and place on your calender: Wednesday, 25 May 2011, 10 pm.
The alarmist scientists have put themselves in a climate cataclysm box, and are desperate to protect their reputations, predictions and funding.
Alarmist scientists and institutions seek billions more, while virtually no government money goes to research into natural forces.
But meanwhile Climate Chaos, Inc. (Big Green, Big Government, alarmist scientists, crony corporatist «green» energy companies, and allied universities and scientific groups) will become richer, gain more control over our lives and livelihoods, and rarely be held accountable for the damage they cause.
During the May 23, 2010, segment of «World News,» ABC played a brief, 23 - second clip of Princeton - educated Dr. Fred Singer expressing his skepticism over man - made climate change, along with clips of two alarmist scientists.
An alarmist scientist appeared on NBC much more recently, however, only 115 days ago.
Interesting huh??? The alarmist scientists seem more like politicians and the «deniers» seem more like... uh... scientists.
The alarmist scientists and the legacy media are in bed with one another because both are ideologically and emotionally committed to promoting the scare.
The planet has been cooling since 1998, that was a major concern with the alarmists scientists.
Alarmist scientists have been caught red - handed tampering with raw data in order to exaggerate sea level rise.
This is probably the truest, wisest, cleverest thing any climate alarmist scientist has ever said in history — even the truth only came out by accident and not in the way she intended.