The three studies, using different methodologies to estimate the global surface
albedo feedback associated with snow and sea ice changes, all suggest that this feedback is positive in all the models, and that its range is much smaller than that of cloud feedbacks.
Since the TAR, some progress has been made in quantifying the surface
albedo feedback associated with the cryosphere.
It is not that the polar regions are amplifying the warming «going on» at lower latitudes, it is that any warming going on AT THE POLES is amplified through inherent positive feedback processes AT THE POLES, and specifically this is primarily the ice - albedo positive feedback process whereby more open water leads to more warming leads to more open water, etc. *** «Climate model simulations have shown that ice
albedo feedbacks associated with variations in snow and sea - ice coverage are a key factor in positive feedback mechanisms which amplify climate change at high northern latitudes...»
«Climate model simulations have shown that ice
albedo feedbacks associated with variations in snow and sea - ice coverage are a key factor in positive feedback mechanisms which amplify climate change at high northern latitudes...»
Not exact matches
Both are related to
feedback mechanisms which can amplify or dampen initial changes, such as the connection between temperature and the
albedo associated with sea - ice and snow.
The Arctic provides an early indicator of global climate change through
feedback systems
associated with factors such as the high
albedo of snow and ice [Holland and Bitz, 2003].
Based on the understanding of both the physical processes that control key climate
feedbacks (see Section 8.6.3), and also the origin of inter-model differences in the simulation of
feedbacks (see Section 8.6.2), the following climate characteristics appear to be particularly important: (i) for the water vapour and lapse rate
feedbacks, the response of upper - tropospheric RH and lapse rate to interannual or decadal changes in climate; (ii) for cloud
feedbacks, the response of boundary - layer clouds and anvil clouds to a change in surface or atmospheric conditions and the change in cloud radiative properties
associated with a change in extratropical synoptic weather systems; (iii) for snow
albedo feedbacks, the relationship between surface air temperature and snow melt over northern land areas during spring and (iv) for sea ice
feedbacks, the simulation of sea ice thickness.
Re # 5 As far as I understand it (drawing on my recollections of a lecture Hansen gave here at Yale a few weeks back), the actual net forcing
associated with Milankovich cycles is relatively small, but it tends to trigger massive
feedbacks (e.g. polar ice expanding, lowering
albedo, cooling, expanding more) that «snowball» into a glacial period.
Given the role of warming in
albedo change and the projections of increased warming and enhanced melting, future changes in the GrIS
albedo will likely result largely from warming and
associated feedbacks.
These runs are examined for evidence of accelerated climate change
associated with the removal of sea ice, particularly due to increasing surface
albedo feedback.