«While our study confirms what dozens of earlier studies have found — that an increase in
alcohol taxes reduces drinking and reduces alcohol - related health problems, what is unique is that we identified that alcohol taxes do in fact impact the whole range of drinking drivers, including extremely drunk drivers,» Wagenaar said.
Not exact matches
The peak body for winemakers has slammed a new study findings that higher
taxes on cheap
alcohol could
reduce consumption.
Our modelling suggested that replacing the WET with a volumetric
tax, alone, would increase taxation revenue by $ 1.3 billion,
reduce overall
alcohol consumption by 1.3 %, significantly
reduce alcohol related harm and save lives.
Commenting on the findings of this report, IAS Chief Executive Katherine Brown said: «The desire to support pubs has often been used as a reason to resist policies to
reduce alcohol - related harm, including minimum unit pricing, increasing
alcohol taxes and stricter drink - drive laws.
Our findings suggest that whether you want to support pubs or to
reduce harmful drinking, the answer is the same: increase the price of the cheapest
alcohol through
tax or minimum unit pricing.»
«Raising
taxes on
alcohol would go a long way toward
reducing excessive
alcohol consumption, but there has been a lot of resistance to doing this.
Stronger
alcohol policies, including
taxes and sales restrictions, have been shown to
reduce the likelihood of
alcohol involvement among homicide victims, according to a new study from Boston Medical Center (BMC) and Boston University.
Crost said that all of the costs and benefits from policies designed to
reduce alcohol consumption, such as the minimum legal drinking age or liquor
taxes, need to be assessed.
Printing notices of the
tax and tips for
reducing fuel consumption on gas receipts has the potential to significantly increase driver awareness and
reduce demand, as previous government education projects have
reduced demand for tobacco,
alcohol, and even water during droughts.
They now argue for high
taxes on tobacco and
alcohol to
reduce consumption and addiction even through the price elasticities are no higher than before.
Sin is understood to be the best thing to
tax, but
taxing it is generally seen as impractical, due to sin being generally underground (driven there by laws, with
taxes thus
reduced to excises on
alcohol and tobacco)... However,
taxing Carbon is easy, even when Carbon use is regarded as sinful, because there is no chance of anyone covering it up in a big way... All that had to be done was to put a handle on it, on Carbon use as sinful, that bureaucrats could use, scientific proof, formulae, models, and all that, and surround them with minders, Environmental PR minders.
And any
alcohol tax reforms intended to
reduce the gap will have to be discussed with Aboriginal Australians.