Conceptions of alcoholism within the Army range from the moralism of the mission type to an attitude of enlightenment which regards
alcoholism as a sickness.
At the laying of the cornerstone for the institution on September 24, 1858, Bellows made a statement upon which those who object to the treatment of
alcoholism as a sickness could well ponder today, over one hundred years later:
Not exact matches
In a sense, constructive confrontation of the pleasurable aspect of the
sickness of
alcoholism can be a growth experience for the minister
as a counselor.
Alcoholism begins
as a personal sin and ends
as a
sickness.
Then, in an extremely useful review of «sin,
sickness,
alcoholism, and drug addictions,» Clinebell mentions several of a «confusing variety of usages,» applied,
as he says, now and again to
alcoholism and other substance addictions — several of which are not mutually exclusive: 1.
I myself will never adopt an understanding that the power to overcome «disease» or sin or «
sickness» or whatever
alcoholism is, can be received from, or operated with, «something» or «somebody» or a «power greater than myself» or a «higher power» or a «group» or a light bulb, chair, bulldozer, goddess, doorknob, radiator or any of the other «absurd names for God» (
as Rev. Sam Shoemaker, our «cofounder» described them).
(3) We have observed that physiological changes
as well
as cultural attitudes toward
alcoholism (which regard it
as a question of willpower rather than a
sickness) probably contribute to the perpetuation of the addiction once it is established.
If an individual decides that it is smarter not to drink, he is detaching himself from the «exposed population» so far
as the
sickness of
alcoholism is concerned.