Not exact matches
For some context,
when No Child Left Behind required every state to adopt standards, create
assessments aligned to those
assessments, and build an accountability and reporting system, it gave states 44 months to do all of those things (from January 2002 to September 2005).
Amid way too much talk about testing and the Common Core, not enough attention is being paid to what parents will actually learn about their children's achievement
when results are finally released from the recent round of state
assessments (most of which assert that they're «
aligned» with the Common Core).
Resistance to making standards consequential:
When Common Core and the
aligned assessments were launched in 2010, states were also busy adopting ambitious new teacher evaluation systems and refashioning the ways in which they held local schools and districts accountable.
For example, if and
when states implement new
assessments aligned to the Common Core, it won't really matter for accountability purposes if proficiency rates fall.
When Georgia announced its decision to drop out of one of two federally funded
assessment consortia
aligned with the Common Core, it sparked a lot of Twitter hand - wringing about Common Core implementation from Andrew Smarick and Rick Hess, not to mention a Politico article using verbs like «crumbling» and «unraveling.»
But, under pressure from the federal government, most states tied the new
assessments to accountability at a time
when teachers» practice and local curriculum had not yet become fully
aligned with new expectations.
But
when policymakers seek to hold students, teachers, and schools accountable for those standards by using the results from
aligned assessments, support is far more likely to falter.
The downside, of course, is that educators might be setting themselves up for a rude awakening
when their students face the new Common Core —
aligned assessments — and they've only been prepared for a fraction of the items.
The implementation of rigorous Common Core —
aligned assessments could bring a backlash, particularly if and
when parents see test scores plummet.
This study was conducted at a time
when CAP was a high - stakes
assessment and
when it was not
aligned with California curriculum guidelines for teaching writing.
When the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers and the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium developed their Common Core - based
assessments, test developers faced considerable pressure to
align the career and college readiness benchmarks with NAEP's Proficient benchmark.
To this last point, we should ask ourselves whether it makes sense to
align benchmarks on Common Core
assessments (potential gatekeepers for high school graduation or college enrollment) with NAEP's Proficient benchmark
when fully 50 percent of students judged merely «Basic» by NAEP's metrics go on to obtain a four - year degree (Scott, Ingels, & Owings, 2007).
A consortium writing Common Core -
aligned standardized tests for 18 states released an estimate for how much their
assessment will cost
when it rolls out in 2014 - 15.
Bottom line: Higher education leaders in every state should support statewide
assessments in high school that are
aligned with college readiness standards and use them as early college readiness indicators, instead of waiting to assess students
when they arrive on campus.
When our
assessments are
aligned to the standards, we have the ability to help our students narrow in on that target.
Consider several domains
when determining if an SEL
assessment will
align to standards and maximize student outcomes.
If I had a time machine I'd ride back about two weeks (pre-deadline) and add a little more content to one of Governor Murphy's promises, specifically the one he made to at the 2016 NJEA Convention (and other venues):
When asked whether he'd follow NJEA's instructions and get rid of
assessments aligned with college / career ready standards, he said, «I'll give you the one - sentence answer: Scrap PARCC Day One.»
When selecting an SEL
assessment, be sure to look for one that is research - based, is
aligned to your SEL goals, and is easy to administer.
When selecting or designing an interim
assessment aligned to state standards, highly effective principals and district leaders work with teachers to drill down to this level of specificity, and they continually push as far beyond the state standards as their students and teachers are ready to go.
Others will want to take longer, waiting until the California Department of Education (CDE) develops a curriculum framework, and until more is known about what kind of statewide science
assessment --- the tests students will take that are
aligned with the new standards — will be adopted and
when.
When the California State Board of Education voted last week to once again delay holding schools accountable for their students» performance on new Common Core -
aligned assessments, they had one thing right: Schools still haven't effectively transitioned to the new standards and are not prepared to help all children meet them.
The
assessments we're giving to see if kids have mastered the standards or to inform our instruction — we're not sure if they're perfectly
aligned with how the students will be assessed on the Smarter Balanced Assessment, and
when we get the data, it's harder to do things with it because it's more complex data.
Education Week's third annual survey of states» tests found a landscape far more stable in 2016 - 17 than it was in 2014 - 15,
when dozens of states had tossed aside their old
assessments to try the new arrivals designed by two big consortia of states, the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium and the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, to
align with the Common Core State Standards.
«With Eleanor's book, a teacher can create units of instruction with meaningful assignments that incorporate the new CCSS, provide a means for evaluating student growth as the assignments can definitely serve as models of formative
assessment, and highlight teacher effectiveness
when aligned to state evaluation rubrics.»
High standards for all students is a worthy goal, but often
assessments and evaluation based on the standards are not congruent with how students learn, even
when aligned with what students are taught.
States are using both student - achievement measures (measures of student learning at a specific point in time) and growth measures (changes in student learning over time), including value - added estimates based on state
assessments when available, to capture measures of student success
aligned with individual teachers or teams of teachers.
The Southern Regional Education Board created a brief that provides a descriptive overview of each state's efforts to train and support educators
when preparing for and implementing the standards and
aligned assessments through professional learning.
Learning goals
when aligned with
assessment items, reinforce the foundation of a course.
Adopting and protecting college and career ready standards and
aligned assessments at a time
when states across the country were rolling back progress on this front.
Three steps that educators can take to prevent over testing are to (a) have a purpose for each
assessment given, (b)
align selected measures with the purpose, and (c) know
when to stop testing.
This planning can occur collaboratively with teachers in their professional learning communities (PLCs)
when they are
aligning curriculum,
assessment and instruction while reviewing student performance data.
Adopting and protecting college - and career - readiness standards and
aligned assessments at a time
when states across the country were rolling back progress on that front.
Only LevelSet includes an
assessment forecast report * and a college and career readiness report that forecast student preparedness and are automatically adjusted
when Lexile ® levels increase to guide instruction that
aligns with students» needs.
Higher education leaders in every state should support statewide
assessments in high school that are
aligned with college readiness standards and use them as early college readiness indicators, instead of waiting to assess students
when they arrive on campus.
Even larger costs are expected
when the new
assessments aligned with the Common Core are created.
When schools are vertically
aligned, standards, curriculum and
assessment from each grade level serve as a foundation on which to build the standards, curriculum and
assessment of the next grade.
Short cycle
assessments aligned with each of the learning targets (standards) allows teachers and students to respond
when the gap is smallest.
The new New York State Common Core -
aligned state
assessments are fundamentally different than the tests that preceded them — except
when the state needs to assume that they aren't.
Instruction works best
when it's carefully
aligned with content goals and fashioned to address the needs indicated by both formal and informal formative
assessment.
Such efforts come at a time
when states across the country are preparing to field - test
assessments aligned with the Common Core State Standards, and
when controversy over the common core in many statehouses has reignited the debate over testing overload.
The common
assessment process works best
when teams work collaboratively through all aspects of the process — from prioritizing and unpacking their standards to writing the
aligned assessment tools to monitoring their impact with results.
Who would trust analysts or bankers
when they have interests that do not
align with providing an honest
assessment?