Not exact matches
He repeated his earlier position that the state's rollout of curricula and
tests aligned with the Common Core academic standards was rushed, that teachers were not prepared and there is too
much testing in general.
Among them, according to Levesque: «The
tests are not
aligned to what teachers are teaching, nor used to help my child; too
much cramming before the
test, and too
much dead time after the
test; teachers who haven't seen the information from the
tests; and a lack of transparency in what is
tested and why.»
Recently, mounting evidence has suggested that measures of individual cognitive skills that incorporate dimensions of
test - score performance provide
much better indicators of economic outcomes — while also
aligning the research with the policy deliberations.
Amid way too
much talk about
testing and the Common Core, not enough attention is being paid to what parents will actually learn about their children's achievement when results are finally released from the recent round of state assessments (most of which assert that they're «
aligned» with the Common Core).
This is enormously risky and, frankly, hubristic, since nobody yet has any idea whether these standards will be solid, whether the
tests supposed to be
aligned with them will be up to the challenge, or whether the «passing scores» on those
tests will be high or low,
much less how this entire apparatus will be sustained over the long haul.
Supporters of the Common Core, ourselves included, peer out across this vast nation and see a hodge - podge of standards,
tests, textbooks, curricular guides, lesson plans — little of it of high quality or particularly «innovative» (with
much of the «innovative» stuff being faddish and silly), and none of it
aligned with
much else in any meaningful sense.
Next month, education officials in Massachusetts will decide whether to abandon the state's
much - praised MCAS
test and adopt the Common Core -
aligned PARCC
test.
Much of the opposition to the Common Core —
aligned assessments — particularly among parents — is related to a broader backlash against the amount of
testing students now undergo and a perception that it diminishes instructional time and encourages «teaching to the
test.»
Instead of states mandating a single curricular approach within their geographic boundaries —
much less a single national approach such as Common Core — states should empower local school systems and other educational providers to select quality standards and
aligned tests that fit their instructional philosophy, while also empowering parents to choose from among different schools the one which best meets the needs of their children.
Educators are concerned because so
much is still unclear about the implementation of the
tests, and whether the resources being created to
align with the new standards will truly teach what students are meant to learn.
The dashboard
aligns research - based strategies and practitioner -
tested techniques with each district's specific needs, allowing school district leaders to create systemic action plans for student - centered, personalized learning before purchasing additional technology — ensuring a
much smoother implementation.
Seven years after the Common Core standards were introduced, not
much progress has been made in pulling together data from Common Core -
aligned tests in different states that would allow researchers to make comparisons across states, Matt Barnum notes in an article for Chalkbeat.
A consortium writing Common Core -
aligned standardized
tests for 18 states released an estimate for how
much their assessment will cost when it rolls out in 2014 - 15.
Deputy Chancellor Shael Polakow - Suransky said the city has helped schools as
much as it can, given that the state has not yet released a «final blueprint» for next year's math expectations or offered sample Common Core -
aligned test questions.
Fifty percent may place too
much weight on
test scores that are
aligned with course content, but isn't zero percent — the result of Cuomo's moratorium — too little?
On Monday, the 21 - state Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, or PARCC, announced how
much it would cost for the Core -
aligned test: $ 29.50 a student for summative math and reading
tests.
But on this
much they agree: The curriculum will fail if it isn't carefully implemented with meaningful
tests that are
aligned with what the students are supposed to learn.
Nine states are considering using scores on standardized Common Core -
aligned tests in the future, but plans vary greatly as to how
much weight scores will receive.
Oddly enough, the DOE pretty
much admits that we did not need PARCC to demonstrate this to us because New Jersey participates in the National Assessment of Educational Progress
testing every several years, and, wouldn't you know it, NAEP and PARCC results are not perfectly
aligned, but they come pretty darned close (as do SAT and ACT scores):
The principal doesn't consider that good enough; she expects that the new, Common Core —
aligned test results will reflect how
much work remains.
Fully
aligned with Swiss and French school curricula, the Academy invites you to discover its MOOCs platform comprising videos, activities, educational worksheets and
much more... Plus, if you wish to go even further, the
tests and quizzes will help you keep track of your pupils» progress.
I very
much understand having
testing that
aligns with our standards.
That figure comes in part from
test support materials, software and new textbooks
aligned with the Common Core, but
much of it will come from the expansion of charter schools.