When speaking about the swift and drastic changes in education based on implementation of Common Core and
aligned tests she used the word upheaval.
Not satisfied with a state Board of Regents decision to put a hold on the use of test scores in teacher and principal evaluations, New York State Allies for Public Education is urging its members to opt out of local exams that will be taking the place of standardized, Common Core -
aligned tests used to evaluate teachers.
Not exact matches
The vote came a few months after the state's teachers unions, closely
aligned with the Assembly, claimed a victory in December when the Regents, prompted by the governor and Legislative leaders, placed a moratorium on the
use of student
test scores in teacher evaluations.
Cuomo and lawmakers then included in the state budget provisions that prevented Common Core -
aligned test scores from being included on students» permanent records or
used in promotion decisions.
He and his wife chose to opt out their fifth grade son from taking the Common Core -
aligned exams this year because they believe the
tests were
used for other purposes than what they were meant for, such as teacher evaluations and school funding.
He criticized Cuomo's efforts to improve the implementation of the standards during this legislative session, which included new laws that prevent Common Core -
aligned tests from being
used for students» permanent records or in promotion decisions.
The budget banned the
use of Common Core -
aligned tests on students» transcripts and from
use in promotion decisions.
Leadership in both houses of the state Legislature support a two - year moratorium on
using Common Core -
aligned test scores to evaluate teachers and principals or to make decisions about student placement or promotion, a plan supported by teachers» unions.
The unions» petition follows their aggressive push for a three - year moratorium on
using tests aligned to the rigorous Common Core standards for «high stakes» decisions affecting teachers and students.
Unions and advocacy groups have pushed legislation that would cut down on
testing or dilute the state's reform agenda by enacting a three - year moratorium on
using scores from Common Core -
aligned exams for «high stakes.»
The petition comes as the union continues to call for a three - year moratorium on
using tests aligned to the rigorous Common Core standards for «high stakes» decisions affecting teachers and students.
Alhough students» scores on the Common Core -
aligned state
tests won't be
used for teacher and principal evaluations, the growth scores will still be calculated and
used for school accountability to comply with federal law, a state Education Department official said.
While this process goes forward, the task force recommends that the results from state
tests aligned to the current Common Core standards not be
used as part of student and teacher evaluations before 2019.
The interests of the CSFR and the NCLS
aligned well on many SFRL projects, conferences, publications, and AAAS annual meeting symposia such as on the ethical and legal implications of genetic
testing;
use of animals in research and education; scientific misconduct and research integrity;
use of scientific and technical information in the courts; ethical and legal aspects of computer network
use and abuse; effects of national security controls on unclassified research, and the impact of neuroscience on the legal system.
• Work with client schools to administer NAEP (or some other matrix - based
test aligned to the standards) to 2,000 students each year in key grade levels;
use their performance to set the curve for the summative
test (think of this as «Curriculum NAEP,» the equivalent of the current state NAEP
testing).
And when the
tests are too narrow a measure or aren't properly
aligned to standards, they provide little concrete information that teachers and schools can
use to improve teaching and learning for individual students.
This
test should
align closely to the curriculum, and every school
using that curriculum would
use that
test to measure student performance.
The union is
using the standards as an excise to call for a moratorium on teacher evaluations as states move to Common Core —
aligned tests.
Among them, according to Levesque: «The
tests are not
aligned to what teachers are teaching, nor
used to help my child; too much cramming before the
test, and too much dead time after the
test; teachers who haven't seen the information from the
tests; and a lack of transparency in what is
tested and why.»
(In the design of its own Core -
aligned tests, New York State wisely pushes the envelope by allowing
test designers to
use excerpts from books that «include controversial ideas and language that some may find provocative» — but the actual passages
used in the assessments can not themselves exhibit those qualities.)
The exam
aligns to the multiple intelligences which includes
test questions that cover: Multiple Choice Charts and Diagrams True and False Word Bank
Using the Genetic code to transcribe and translate base sequences Embedded within the exam is a survey tool that can measure your student's understanding of the content without relying simply on a summative assessment.
When those efforts failed, largely due to the state's powerful business lobby, the governor issued an executive order to pull the state out of a consortium of states
using a Common Core -
aligned test.
«But we realized we needed to get our assessments
aligned with California standards and
use data from those
tests to inform our instruction.
Matt Barnum looks at what states are doing about their exit exams now that they are
using Common Core -
aligned tests, which are harder than the old state
tests they
used.
Common Core was and remains a political concern, and the number of states planning to
use the Common Core —
aligned PARCC and Smarter Balanced assessments dropped from 45 in 2011 to just 20 that actually
used one of the two
tests in 2016 (see «The Politics of the Common Core Assessments,» features, Fall 2016).
A new report by the Fordham Institute takes a close look at the content, rigor, and quality of the new Common Core -
aligned tests, and also at the MCAS, the exam
used in Massachusetts which has been considered one of the best
tests in the country.
But we should not be
using tests aligned with a set of standards to coerce schools and educators to change their practice.
But in the case of private - school accountability, it doesn't have to be the Common Core —
aligned tests that states will be
using for their district and charter schools (some of which also need «alternative» accountability arrangements).
The Common Core —
aligned tests would also allow policymakers to
use the same measuring stick to evaluate student progress in different states.
In an article for The 74, Matt Barnum looks at what states are doing about their exit exams now that they are
using Common Core -
aligned tests,
Members of the board that oversees the assessment program, in a meeting here this month, outlined the difficulty of designing a
test for Puerto Rico with questions that are closely
aligned to those on the
test used throughout the United States.
And when the
tests are too narrow a measure or aren't properly
aligned to standards, they provide little concrete information teachers and schools can
use to improve teaching and learning for individual students.
ExamView offers a bank of thousands of
test items
aligned to state standards across subjects which teachers can
use to create and administer online quizzes and
tests, and which refreshes with new items if the same student takes the quiz again.
The Common Core standards initiative was launched in 2009 but by the time new
tests aligned with those standards were rolled out 4 to 5 years later, there was mounting opposition to
using those
tests to evaluate teachers and schools.
Signing up for the trials is an excellent opportunity to
test different virtual classroom software at no cost while making the decision to purchase one that is
aligned with your needs in terms of features, functions and ease of
use and budget.
... First of all, to assess where the students are at
using rigorous
tests that are
aligned with existing standards and benchmarks.
More recently, we've seen evidence that a knowledge - focused curriculum can lead to better results on Common Core -
aligned tests, which New York began
using two years ago.
The standards themselves — and the Common Core -
aligned tests that many students nationwide first took this past spring — don't specify what knowledge students should learn in each grade, because they're designed to be
used across the country.
Mobilizing employers and business leaders to insist that states
align high school standards, assessments and graduation requirements with the demands of postsecondary education and work and show graduates that achievement matters by
using high school transcripts and exit
test results in making hiring decisions.
Now that the
tests in many states are getting harder in order to
align with the new Common Core standards and being
used to grade teachers, not just students, they're also producing a lot of anxiety among parents and teachers, too.
His colleague Laura Zingmond added that since Scrambled Paragraphs weren't
aligned with state standards, replacing the section with multiple - choice reading comprehension questions similar to what students are
used to seeing on Common Core
tests would make the exam more accessible to all students.
In Smith's model, as it was refined over time, curriculum standards serve as the fulcrum for educational reform implemented based on state decisions; state policy elites aim to create excellence in the classroom
using an array of policy levers and knobs — all
aligned back to the standards — including
testing, textbook adoption, teacher preparation, teacher certification and evaluation, teacher training, goals and timetables for school
test score improvement, and state accountability based on those goals and timetables.
So in total: The Department will be hands - off about the
test systems states choose; the consortia will sink or swim based on their ability to create products states want; states may chose to go in different directions, making comparing results difficult; but the Department will
use its peer - review process to ensure state systems are
aligned with standards and set the proficiency bar high.
Kentucky, New York and Minnesota are already
using Common Core -
aligned assessments, and state education officials in Georgia and Oklahoma also say they'll build new
tests.
But all participating states are to administer new standardized
tests aligned with the Common Core in the spring and the Obama administration requires most states to
use those
test scores to evaluate teachers.
Creighton and WestEd
used four major improvement strategies: 1) refining the curriculum and
aligning staff training and student
tests to that curriculum; 2) improving instructional practices, including those for English language learners, who comprise a large share of the district's students; 3) developing and
using tests during the school year, other than those
used for accountability, to assess what students had learned; and 4) implementing a system of individualized instruction based on student needs.
Georgia education officials announced Monday they won't
use the Common Core -
aligned test being designed by the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
Only two states, Indiana and Iowa, saw overall decreases, but both states
used tests that were not
aligned to their standards during this period, and Indiana also replaced its standards.
The report recommended that: policy makers ensure curriculum and assessments are
aligned at state, district and local levels; districts survey teachers on
test prep activities and keep those that are highly rated, while dropping those that aren't; districts expand access to technology so students can develop skills before taking
tests and teachers can support them; and districts only
use interim
tests aimed at predicting performance on end - of - the - year
tests, if teachers believe they are high - quality.
The union is
using the standards as an excise to call for a moratorium on teacher evaluations as states move to Common Core -
aligned tests.