The rising cost of gas coupled with rising concern
about greenhouse gas emissions weigh heavily on all fleet operations.
«We compared many different coastal ecosystems and have made a clear case for including coastal wetlands in discussions
about greenhouse gas mitigation,» said Ariana Sutton - Grier, an assistant research scientist at UMD's Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center and a co-lead author of the research paper.
Yet, says botanist Jan Pokorny of Charles University in Prague, these snippets from Kenya are not
about greenhouse gases, but rather the way that land - use changes — specifically deforestation — affect climate; newly tree - free ground «represents huge amounts of solar energy changed into sensible heat, i.e. hot air.»
Concerns
about greenhouse gas emissions simply do not have a high priority now in developing nations.
Humans worry
about greenhouse gases, but between 1.8 billion and 800 million years ago, microscopic ocean dwellers really needed them.
,» where kids will learn
about greenhouse gases and carbon dioxide as they balance CO2 sources with CO2 «sinks» in order to balance gas emissions.
The university educators assigned teachers to read articles
about greenhouse gases before participating in the activities.
Prior to conducting experiments
about greenhouse gases, the university educators and the teachers discussed the topic.
You care
about greenhouse gases and your carbon footprint.
ABM: The whole point
about the greenhouse gases in a planetary atmosphere is that they absorb the infrared radiation emitted by the surface, and so Kirchhoff's law does not apply.
If all of these people are so concerned
about greenhouse gases then why not stop the emissions related to their long CO2 generating journey.
Also pack up all your cares and woes if you're concerned about the future of renewables, especially solar power, the same section contains an article in which Dr. Ray Kurzweil says in part:» Worried
about greenhouse gas emissions?
So what
about those greenhouse gases that man pumps into the skies?
no. 5490, pp. 262 — 269], and when asked
about greenhouse gases claimed that he had a good record of dealing with pollutants!
I am talking
about greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels.
While I am still comfortable with my argument that «human inertia» is the prime explanation for a long response time for doing anything
about greenhouse gas emissions, I am very wary of efforts by California and the U.K. to stick their necks out on carbon reductions.
In the meantime, the more serious question for ecotourism — at the poles or in the Galápagos Islands or elsewhere — remains similar to questions
about greenhouse gases, population, and many other issues: How much is too much?
Kudos to the group attempting to do something
about greenhouse gasses.
I can count myself as one of those after my article
about the greenhouse gas emissions from producing and transporting one bottle of Fiji water all the way from the South Pacific to the US (do a Google search for «Fiji water» and my article is still one of the top links to appear).
I have read a bit
about greenhouse gases, reflection of heat from Earth's surface, etc. but can't imagine man having any real significant ability to change Earth's temperature at all.
Sure other thermal processes are important; but the one thing you can say
about the greenhouse gas warming hypothesis, is that it is entirely a matter of Radiation Physics.
When you think
about greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide usually comes to mind.
Could these reports be similar to the national communications required for Annex - I (e.g. developed countries) by the UNFCCC, which include information
about all greenhouse gas sources, calculation methodology, and sectors?
In the June / July 2011 issue of First Things, Dr. Happer published a summary of his views: «The Truth
About Greenhouse Gases: The dubious science of the climate crusaders» (see http://www.firstthings.com/article/2011/05/the-truth-about-greenhouse-gases).
The environment Heated but hollow Congress embarks on a rhetorical debate
about greenhouse gases
The department said it wanted to ensure its concerns
about greenhouse gas emissions are adequately addressed.
Mr. Mercer was hardly the first to sound an alarm
about greenhouse gases: Scientists were well on their way by the late 1950s toward connecting mankind's burning of fossil fuels to Earth's changing climate.
Alternet: Global temperatures may be climbing at a rate too fast for our forests and its biodiversity to adapt, a scientist with the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) warned after the World Bank predicted a 4 °C warming of the planet if policymakers continue to be apathetic
about greenhouse gas emissions.
Concerns
about greenhouse gas emissions and climate change took a back seat.
William Happer, «The Truth
About Greenhouse Gases,» First Things, May 21, 2011, http://www.firstthings.com/article/2011/05/the-truth-about-greenhouse-gases 32.
William Happer, «The Truth
About Greenhouse Gases,» First Things, June / July 2011, http://www.firstthings.com/article/2011/05/the-truth-about-greenhouse-gases 14.
Concerns
about greenhouse gas emissions and... Continue reading →
Much of what one often hears
about greenhouse gas emissions from dams being minimal is based on the world's existing dams with measurements of emissions.
Dr. Stanton's testimony, mentioned in a July 13 article by AP reporter Dave Gram about the region's love - hate relationship with natural gas, has helped to shift the dialogue
about greenhouse gas emissions to include the full, lifecycle impacts of long - lived energy infrastructure.
There are Australian schoolkids who «know
all about greenhouse gases, climate change, global warming and sustainaility» but can not read.
Your next science challenge, is to start thinking
about greenhouse gasses, and their absorption spectra.
And having resolved that, the science challenge for Myrrh is now the point
about greenhouse gasses he keeps ducking (ie does he dispute the standard account of CO2's absorption spectra?).
Tomcat October 12, 2012 at 3:58 pm You're seriously saying the basic AGW argument isn't
about greenhouse gasses??
«If people are concerned
about greenhouse gas emissions, biomass makes a lot of sense,» Patton - Mallory said.
And once again you duck the basic question
about greenhouse gasses.
And one of the students (not very bright) asked
about Greenhouse gases poisoning the earth (not climate) one of the units was about studies of pollution in Bangkok.
about Greenhouse gas mitigation in Chinese agriculture: Distinguishing technical and economic potentials
This working paper provides details
about greenhouse gas scope accounting and reporting per the World Resources Institute's Greenhouse Gas Protocol, explains the implications of scope double - counting for zero - carbon reporting when a renewable energy purchase is made, and proposes recommendations for consideration by key stakeholders.
Point above being that one could write a long list of reasonable initiatives without mentioning anything
about greenhouse gases or climate change, which could arguably be good in general, but possibly also slow the change, should it happen in the first place of course.
But we are not going to solve this problem if we just talk
about greenhouse gases and don't talk about how we use the land and what we are doing to the land.
Take a ride through the atmosphere to learn
about greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, the main driver of climate change, and the greenhouse effect.
Unfortunately, most people who study, write and teach
about greenhouse gas reduction don't consider the impact of childbearing.
For example, framing a discussion
about greenhouse gas emissions with an anti-regulatory perspective would endow certain dimensions of the issue with greater apparent relevance than the same dimensions might appear to have under an alternative frame, such as public heath.
Teachers may decide to have students read and share the background articles, linked above,
about greenhouse gases and global warming.
«Especially in light of the fact that our governor and our Legislature are in many ways trying to take us in the other direction — to be more energy conscious, to be more careful
about greenhouse gases.»