Marks introduces his memo with a really important discussion about what he sees as the common misconception
about the definition of liquidity:
We can argue all day
about the definition of «athlete,» so here's one way to look at it.
Along with the specific ways the tech environment excludes certain underrepresented groups, the survey results show a general disagreement
about the definition of a diverse workplace that extends beyond the tech sector.
On the second day of deliberations, the jury asked what «fraudulent intent» meant, and asked clarifying questions
about the definition and scope of assets under management.
Given the diversity of views
about the definition of scalability, perhaps it is best thought of as a phenomena where «you know it when you see it.»
But, in general, there is way too much talking
about definitions, rules, etc. in value investing and worrying about what can be tested empirically and so on and not enough talk about common sense.
Just as this article said, and my comment above, to solve the divide, we can: (1) Argue
about the definition of Race / God (2) Argue about identification in a religion / race (3) Or realize the fundamental problem of prejudice that sneaks into human - made abstractions like «race» and «God».
So let me also be clear
about my definition of Christian — are they loving their neighbor?
I suspect that it's
about definitions.
also invest in a dictionary you are confused
about the definitions of few words when you can come back maybe you will have stopped trying to change the meanings of words and not make a fool of yourself in public again.
It's all
about the definitions and labels that we all bring to the table.
What is distinctive
about this definition is that the society thus appears to be nothing more than the sum of its parts.
Your the first one to talk
about definitions.
It did not change what I was thinking
about the definition of church, but only confirmed it, proving (at least to me) that I was on the right track.
Mormonism is a cult by just
about any definition.
He recently wrote two posts (Post 1 and Post 2)
about the definition of church, and here is an excerpt from one of them:
If we can even argue
about the definition of theology, it's no wonder that theology itself become one big argument.
Technically autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder, but I think we'd be quibbling
about definitions here.
The approach of some of my Christian friends has been to insist that we can not form partnerships to strengthen the institution of marriage with anyone who disagrees with
us about its definition.
Gary: The reason I'm hesitant
about your definition of «religious» is because, as you say, your definition has everything to do with your personal views and beliefs, and not as much to do with how people who call themselves religious perceive themselves, nor with the 150 or so years of academic research into religious phenomena.
The point is not to be arbitrary
about definitions, however, but rather to reveal the following theoretical issue: All three kinds of ideologies in Table have been called civil religions, but there are obvious differences among them.
I unpack my definition of the gospel in my course, but I am curious
about your definition of the gospel.
The leaders of Judaism had dozens if not hundreds of definitions about what was» work «on the Sabbath Day and completely missed the point (Jesus said so) and here we are arguing
about the definition of «drawing ``.
I completely agree with
you about the definition of Christianity and whether that particular definition is true or not.
Atheist and believer will disagree too
about the definition of the human person, about the sources and character of power, about definitions of success and materialism, the power and place of reason in the struggle for bread.
There is only one God... human imagine or uses their thoughts to come up with multiple Gods... which i think is lake of understanding
about the definition of God... i also think the reason we see this is mostly because the teaching of these faiths are showing God as an old dude with white long beard and extended hands... its all human imaginations...
We who argue
about the definition of torture in rendition and combat situations when we have officially renounced the use of violence, should appreciate the irony.
But when we recognize (as we saw in the post yesterday
about the definition of baptism) that «baptism» means «immersion into» or «identification with» some of the tricky passages in Scripture become much more clear.
Good point Lisa,
about the definition.
I've read a lot of the more controversial postings recently (such as the recent ones on Hell and Homosexuality as well as some older ones
about the definition of the gospel) where it seems that the debates in the comment section always fail (at least for me) to help those who are trying to learn.
I've read books on eternal security, I'm not talking about that, but rather, I'm talking
about your definition of «saved» as deliverance.
Jesus is unambiguous
about his definition.
About the definition of «atheism.»
I have my doubts
about definition 3, at least as regards verbal communication.
An after - school talk
about definitions turned swiftly into a probing conversation about the Church, in which Emily described what happened during Mass..
Our criticisms thus far —
about the definition of the Ego, of past and future, and finally of the forgiveness of sin — would seem to substantiate this.
Turn his boat back and tell him that he should live with people who agree with
him about the definition of freedom.
I worry
about a definition of faithfulness that delivers on this «felt need.»
Whitehead called attention to this important fact
about definitions years ago, but his warnings have been largely disregarded.
I also have questions
about a definition of the church that assumes that the local pastor places it «foremost in his life» while for «the most dedicated elder, deacon, or trustee — with rare exception» — it has, at best, third priority.
So you should really think
about your definition of «religion».
Televangelists... the one category of people who know the least
about the definition of the word «reality».
So when we talk
about a definition of freedom, and that's a huge philosophical topic, I like to come down with this one: it is the freedom to do gladly and freely what I am supposed to do.
More information
about the definition is here:
Historians will argue endlessly, but not fruitlessly,
about definitions of the term, but their colleagues and the public will not wait for a neat definition.
It's all
about your definition of efficiency and sustainability.
(Don't ask
about the definition of a bread's crumb — I can't explain it, but I think these have it.).
It was A. Bartlett Giamatti who probably said, «The definition of insanity is to keep using that stupid quote
about the definition of insanity,» so I can't really fault the Rays for trying again.
Earlier, we just tapped
about the definition of a teepee tent which we have mentioned that it is a type of tent in a triangular shape.
Part of the problem is that few of us, including therapists, can even agree
about the definition of Internet infidelity.