Sentences with phrase «all about the single player»

Seriously admin, rehashing nonsense stories from the Metro, a website that runs 3 conflicting stories about a single player at the same time on the same day!

He said: «I worry about every single player in my squad and I want every single player to be happy but at the end of the day only 11 players can start the game.

If they decide to Stay the debacle of their transfer saga will make them to play among motivated players that have the chance to prove that AFC is not about a single player but the TEAM.

People are complaining about the single player, but I think that is absurd as this ia really a multiplayer game.

Can you tell me about the single player campaign?

Talking about Single Player you can still pause the game but in a harder way.

i was curious about the single player portion of battlefront II though it doesn't look worthwhile.

But who really cares about single player?

But fighting games aren't really all about the single player experience.

I do worry a bit about the single player experience which I confess I haven't spent a lot of time in.

What about single player games?

However, if you care at all about single player content in your fighting games, proper support for arcade sticks and fight pads, a robust selection of modes, multi-person lobbies for online play, a diverse selection of stages to fight on, or a sizable roster of fighters to play with then Street Fighter V is going to disappoint you.

If you're talking about the single player longevity you may have a point, although it may be one of the rare cases where the length is just the right amount for the story, such as the case with heavenly sword.

I need to hear more about the single player content.

But I've not really talked explicitly about the Single Player game itself and what it might be like in this new intramedia model.

In Mess About you can play a multiplayer game with bots and lastly the Gladiate mode seems to be a challenge room for each class to compete for top scores. Only the Mess About single player mode is available in the current beta.

Even though it was lacking any major information about the single player campaign, it gives us a small glimpse into what 343 industries have planned for the multiplayer elements of the game.

Randy chats with the Art Director for Company of Heroes 2 to chat about the single player portion of the game, explodability, and historical accuracy.

With an 8 hour - ish campaign and plenty of collectibles to look for, Brave is all about its single player mode.

Can you tell me about the single player campaign?

Oh and I am talking about single player here; multi-player isn't being assessed in this article.

I know the ultimate edition comes with extra things, but I'm more about single player and DLCs that give you a reason to come back to the game.

At the moment it looks like it's going to be a really fun multiplayer experience, what about a single player campaign?

Dice isn't saying much about the single player campaign just yet, but the studio has revealed that their story will follow several characters located at various theaters of war around the world.

Star Wars Battlefront had never really been about single player, outside of being able to string together bot matches into a Galactic Campaign, and yet the 2015 reboot got a lot of flak for not having a story mode.

Since talking about the single player experience would contain way too many spoilers, let's focus on that multiplayer aspect, shall we?

Bomberman has never been about its single player.

I won't go into much detail about the single player campaign controversy here, but I will say that you get to kill a lot of virtual people.

This was because while the trailer showed the multiplayer (with all stages and weapons from the original game included), nothing was said about the single player.

Now about that single player character problem...

Admittedly, most will only care about the single player in Andromeda, but those who enjoyed Mass Effect 3's multiplayer and want to see how Andromeda expands on those concepts will be sorely disappointed.

If you feel bored or lonely about the single player play, just connect to the networks and compete with the players all over the world.

Not exact matches

Ghosts» relatively short single - player campaign — about five hours — ends with the expected mega-explosions and subsequent happy ending... or does it?

I'm not sure if «miss» is the right word here, but you can bet your last dollar, there isn't going to be a single player who will have anything bad to say about AW if / when he decides to leave.

no one single player can win the league for us under the present regime.presently there are eleven losers starting each game for us, not one of them give a damn about the shirt, not even sanchez!.

90 Millions for a single player, we are not Real Madrid... And we are talking about Premier League where prominent players also fade but we know about Dzeko and that's why I would go with Dzeko because he has history of playing well in Premier League and affordability....

I never put the getting results part into question.But the fact that he's our player and I ike him doesn't mean I'll lie about him.I wouldn't also say he's been better in every single season but just that he's adapted more quickly.As for you picking talent over hardwork that's your opininon.After all it's not like Hazard is lazy though Sanchez works harder than him.

Welbeck is our top scorer not coincidence, dide might not be d most prolific or d most talented, buh dude gives over 100 % single match, sanchez looks sooo unfit, uniterested, plays more to d gallery now and gives d ball away more time than I could imagine, its better to have a committed player who is ready to give his all to d team than having bunch of dudes who cares more about their weekly wages, vrry bad period to miss welbeck

We had RvP in what should have been his prime with other handy players, as well as those players that many are still whining about like Fabregas, Nasri, Song — and we won nothing and waited patiently for 8 seasons for him to finally put in that single season performance — an untypical season that now seems to be how many remember his career at Arsenal.

Wenger has already came out and spoken about age ranges, one of the things he said is that we shouldn't be looking to get 2 mature players for a single spot but rather a mature «in his prime now» would be backed up with a developing player.

«I've spoken to plenty of players who have played under him at Arsenal over the years and every single one has only good things to say about his management and coaching style.

He added: «What I would say about Shaw is that the talent and ability are there, but his job as a footballer is to be prepared to perform every day and do every single thing in his life well to be a United player.

As soon as we start attacking, every single arsenal player seems to forget about defending.

It's funny how he said we are better than Liverpool overrall forgetting that in terms of players we were still better than them last season yet the beat us home and away.Liverpool team is not so good yet out of all the top four team they're the ones who play their hearts out.That's why Liverpool didn't lose a single game to a top four team last season though on paper they should have.As for Tottenham if you look at their team they just need a few more signings and consistency so I don't know what's the big deal about them.The painful this is they could've won the league if not for draws.It was a disgrace for any of those two to finish over us last season because on paper it shouldn't be so.This should tell you that it's not all about the team you have.Some it's about luck, sometimes it's about giving your best and sometimes it's just meant to be.

What can you say about being the only club not to sign a single outfield player?

You're talking about 3 players that each demand double coverage or will eat your soul on any given play single covered.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Arsene Wenger keeps banging on about how Arsenal have 25 players in the squad and every single one is important to our attempt to win the Premier League, but when he actually NEEDS to rotate he simply doesn't do it!

Favorisem is one thing which is killing us, and i do hope that sooner or later we will end up with a proper manager who does nt give a single Sh*t about players moods.

Singled out players he don't particularly fancy (ok, we all do that), speculate in idle fantasy about bringing in this player and that player in line with the formation.